Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Assessment of somaclonal variation in Dieffenbachia plants regenerated through indirect shoot organogenesis

  • 301 Accesses

  • 17 Citations

Abstract

The occurrence of somaclonal variation among regenerants derived through indirect shoot organogenesis from leaf explants of three Dieffenbachia cultivars Camouflage, Camille and Star Bright was evaluated. Three types of somaclonal variants (SV1, SV2, and SV3) were identified from regenerated plants of cv. Camouflage, one type from cv. Camille, but none from cv. Star Bright. The three variants had novel and distinct foliar variegation patterns compared to cv. Camouflage parental plants. Additionally, SV1 was taller with a larger canopy and longer leaves than parental plants and SV2. SV2 and SV3 did not produce basal shoots (single stem) but basal shoot numbers between SV1 and parental plants were similar ranging from three to four. The variant type identified from regenerated cv. Camille had lanceolate leaves compared to the oblong leaves of the parent. This variant type also grew taller and had a larger canopy than parental plants. The rates of somaclonal variation were up to 40.4% among regenerated cv. Camouflage plants and 2.6% for regenerated cv. Camille. The duration of callus culture had no effect on somaclonal variation rates of cv. Camouflage as the rates between plants regenerated from 8 months to 16 months of callus culture were similar. The phenotypes of the identified variants were stable as verified by their progenies after cutting propagation. This study demonstrated the potential for new cultivar development by selecting callus-derived somaclonal variants of Dieffenbachia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Abbreviations

2,4-D:

2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid

2iP:

N6-(Δ2-isopentenyl) adenine

IAA:

Indole-3-acetic acid

TDZ:

Thidiazuron

References

  1. Bairu MW, Fennell CW, van Staden J (2006) The effect of plant growth regulators on somaclonal variation in Cavendish banana (Musa AAA cv. ‘Zelig’). Sci Hortic 108:347–351

  2. Bouman H, De Klerk G (1997) Somaclonal variation. In: Geneve RL, Preece JE, Merkle SA (eds) Biotechnology of Ornamental Plants. CAB International, pp 165–183

  3. Chen J, Devanand PS, Norman D, Henny RJ, Chao CT (2004) Analysis of genetic relatedness of Dieffenbachia cultivars using AFLP markers. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 129:81–87

  4. Chen J, Henny RJ (2006) Somaclonal variation: an important source for cultivar development of floriculture crops. In: Teixeira da Silva JA (ed) Floriculture, ornamental and plant biotechnology. Global Science Books, London, UK, pp 244–253

  5. Henny RJ, Chen J (2003) Cultivar development of ornamental foliage plants. Plant Breed Rev 23:245–289

  6. Khalid N, Davey MR, Power JB (1989) An assessment of somaclonal variation in Chrysanthemum morifolium: the generation of plants of potential commercial value. Sci Hortic 38:287–294

  7. Kuznetsova OI, Ash OA, Gostimsky SA (2006) The effect of the duration of callus culture on the accumulation of genetic alternation in pea Pisum sativum L. Russ J Genet 42:555–562

  8. Larkin PJ, Scowcroft WR (1981) Somaclonal variation—a novel source of variability from cell cultures for plant improvement. Theor Appl Genet 60:197–214

  9. Legkobit MP, Khadeeva NV (2004) Variation and morphogenetic characteristics of different Stachys species during microclonal propagation. Russ J Genet 40:743–750

  10. Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassay with tobacco tissue culture. Physiol Plant 15:473–495

  11. Najaran P, Walton PD (1987) A comparison of somatic chromosome instability in tissue culture regenerants from Medicago-media Pers. Plant Cell Rep 6:109–113

  12. Rodrigues PHV, Neto AT, Neto PC, Mendes BMJ (1998) Influence of the number of subcultures on somaclonal variation in micropropagated nanicao (Musa spp., AAA Group). Acta Hortic 490:469–473

  13. SAS Institute Inc. (1999) Version 8.02. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC, U. S. A

  14. Shen X, Chen J, Kane ME (2007) Indirect shoot organogenesis from leaves of Dieffenbachia cv. Camouflage. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 89:83–90

  15. Skirvin RM, McPheeters KD, Norton M (1994) Sources and frequency of somaclonal variation. Hortic Sci 29:1232–1236

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Xiuli Shen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shen, X., Chen, J., Kane, M.E. et al. Assessment of somaclonal variation in Dieffenbachia plants regenerated through indirect shoot organogenesis. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 91, 21–27 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-007-9273-9

Download citation

Keywords

  • Dieffenbachia
  • Organogenesis
  • Somaclonal variation