Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture

, Volume 84, Issue 2, pp 199–211 | Cite as

Agrobacterium-mediated transformation and inbred line development in the model grass Brachypodium distachyon

  • John P. Vogel
  • David F. Garvin
  • Oymon M. Leong
  • Daniel M. Hayden


Brachypodium distachyon (Brachypodium) has been proposed as a model temperate grass because its physical, genetic, and genome attributes (small stature, simple growth requirements, small genome size, availability of diploid ecotypes, annual lifecycle and self fertility) are suitable for a model plant system. Two additional requirements that are necessary before Brachypodium can be widely accepted as a model system are an efficient transformation system and homogeneous inbred reference genotypes. Here we describe the development of inbred lines from 27 accessions of Brachypodium. Determination of c-values indicated that five of the source accessions were diploid. These diploid lines exhibit variation for a variety of morphological traits. Conditions were identified that allow generation times as fast as two months in the diploids. An Agrobacterium-mediated transformation protocol was developed and used to successfully transform 10 of the 19 lines tested with efficiencies ranging from 0.4% to 15%. The diploid accession Bd21 was readily transformed. Segregation of transgenes in the T 1 generation indicated that most of the lines contained an insertion at a single genetic locus. The new resources and methodologies reported here will advance the development and utilization of Brachypodium as a new model system for grass genomics.


c-value embryogenic callus genome size model system tissue culture 





2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid


Linsmaier and Skoog basal medium


Murashige and Skoog salts and vitamins


callus inducing medium


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Arumuganathan K, Earle ED, (1991) Estimation of nuclear DNA content of plants by flow cytometry Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 9:229–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ausubel FM, Brent R, Kingston RE, Moore DD, Seidman JG, Smith JA, Struhl K, (1996). Current Protocols in Molecular Biology New York WileyGoogle Scholar
  3. Bablak P, Draper J, Davey MR, Lynch PT, (1995) Plant regeneration and micropropagation of Brachypodium distachyon Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 42:97–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bennett MD, Leitch IJ, (2005) Nuclear DNA amounts in Angiosperms: progress, problems and prospects Annals of Botany 95:45–90PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cheng M, Lowe BA, Spencer TM, Ye X, Armstrong CL, Cheng M, (2004) Invited review: Factors influencing Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of monocotyledonous species In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 40:31–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Christiansen P, Didion T, Andersen CH, Folling M, Nielsen KK, (2005) A rapid and efficient transformation protocol for the grass Brachypodium distachyon Plant Cell Rep. 23:751–758PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Draper J, Mur LAJ, Jenkins G, Ghosh-Biswas GC, Bablak P, Hasterok R, Routledge APM, (2001) Brachypodium distachyon. A new model system for functional genomics in grasses Plant Phys. 127:1539–1555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Edwards, K, Johnstone C & Thompson C (1991) A simple and rapid method for the preparation of plant genomic DNA For PCR Analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 19Google Scholar
  9. Feldmann KA, (1991) T-DNA insertion mutagenesis in Arabidopsis: Mutational spectrum Plant J. 1:71–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Garfinkel M. Nester EW. (1980) Agrobacterium tumefaciens mutants affected in crown gall tumorigenesis and octopine catabolism J. Bacteriol. 144:732–746PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Gaut BS, (2002) Evolutionary dynamics of grass genomes New Phytol. 154:15–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hasterok R, Draper J, Jenkins G, (2004) Laying the cytotaxonomic foundations of a new model grass, Brachypodium distachyon (L.) beauv Chromosome Res. 12:397–403PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jeon J-S, Lee S, Jung K-H, Jun S-H, Jeong D-H, Lee J, Kim C, Jang S, Lee S, Yang K, Nam J, An K, Han M-J, Sung R-J, Choi H-S, Yu J-H, Choi J-H, Cho S-Y, Cha S-S, Kim S-I, An G, (2000) T-DNA insertional mutagenesis for functional genomics in rice Plant J. 22:561–570PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kellogg EA, (2001) Evolutionary history of the grasses Plant Phys. 125:1198–1205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lazo GR, Stein PA, Ludwig RA, (1991) A DNA transformation-competent Arabidopsis genomic library in Agrobacterium Bio/Technology 9:963–967PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Linsmaier EM, Skoog F, (1965) Organic growth factor requirements of tobacco tissue cultures Plant Phys. 18:100–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Riede CR, Anderson JA, (1996) Linkage of RFLP markers to an aluminum tolerance gene in wheat Crop Sci. 36:905–909CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Shi Y, Draper J, Stace C, (1993) Ribosomal DNA variation and its phylogenetic implication in the genus Brachypodium (Poaceae) Plant Syst. Evol. 188:125–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sundaresan V, Springer P, Volpe T, Haward S, Jones JDG, Dean C, Ma H, Martienssen R, (1995) Patterns of gene action in plant development revealed by enhancer trap and gene trap transposable elements Genes Dev. 9:1797–1810PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Svitashev SK, Somers DA, (2002) Characterization of transgene loci in plants using FISH: A picture is worth a thousand words Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 69:205–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Wolfe KH, (2001) Yesterday’s polyploids and the mystery of diploidization Nature Rev. Genet. 2:333–341PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • John P. Vogel
    • 1
  • David F. Garvin
    • 2
  • Oymon M. Leong
    • 1
  • Daniel M. Hayden
    • 1
  1. 1.USDA Western Regional Research CenterAlbanyUSA
  2. 2.USDA-ARS Plant Science Research Unit and Department of Agronomy and Plant GeneticsUniversity of MinnesotaSt. PaulUSA

Personalised recommendations