Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis

, Volume 44, Issue 2, pp 145–153 | Cite as

Platelet-related biomarkers and their response to inhibition with aspirin and p2y12-receptor antagonists in patients with acute coronary syndrome

  • Angela Lowenstern
  • Robert F. Storey
  • Megan Neely
  • Jie-Lena Sun
  • Dominick J. Angiolillo
  • Christopher P. Cannon
  • Anders Himmelmann
  • Kurt Huber
  • Stefan K. James
  • Hugo A. Katus
  • Joao Morais
  • Agneta Siegbahn
  • Phillippe Gabriel Steg
  • Lars Wallentin
  • Richard C. Becker
  • On behalf of the PLATO Investigators
Article

Abstract

The PLATelet inhibition and patient Outcomes (PLATO) trial showed that treatment with ticagrelor reduced the rate of death due to vascular causes, myocardial infarction and stroke when compared to clopidogrel in patients with ST-elevation or non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (ACS). While the comparative benefit of ticagrelor over clopidogrel increased over time, event rates accrued in both groups during the study period. The purpose of our biomarker-based exploratory analysis was to determine whether long-term platelet inhibition may be associated with platelet adaptation. A sample of 4000 participants from the PLATO trial also consented to participate in a prospectively designed biomarker substudy. Blood samples were procured at baseline, immediately prior to hospital discharge and at 1 and 6 months. Markers of platelet activity, including platelet count, serum CD40-ligand and soluble P-selectin were analyzed. Mean levels were compared at discharge, 1 and 6 months following study drug initiation—first for all patients and subsequently stratified by treatment group. A linear mixed model was used to estimate the short-term change rate (baseline to 1 month) and long-term change rate (1–6 months) for each biomarker. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to calculate hazard ratios for each change in biomarker over the two time periods examined: baseline to 1 month and 1 to 6 months. Prior to randomized treatment (baseline), sCD40 ligand and sP-selectin levels were elevated above the normal range of the assay (0.39 and 33.5 µg/L, respectively). The mean level of each biomarker was significantly different at 1 month compared to baseline (p < 0.0001). When stratified by treatment group, at 1 month patients treated with ticagrelor had a larger increase in platelet count compared to those treated with clopidogrel (p < 0.0001). Similarly, when comparing biomarker levels for all patients at 6 months with those at 1 month, each differed significantly (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference between treatment groups during this time period. The rate of change for both platelet count and sP-selectin were significantly different between baseline and 1 month when compared to the 1 to 6-month time period (p < 0.0001). When comparing treatment groups, the rate of increase in platelets from baseline to 1 month was greater for patients treated with ticagrelor (p < 0.0001). This was no longer observed in the 1 to 6-month interval. Using a Cox proportional hazard model, the increase in platelet count from 1 to 6 months was associated with ischemic-thrombotic events, while sCD40 ligand decrease from 1 to 6 months was associated with hemorrhagic events. There were no differences between treatment groups for the associations with clinical endpoints. Dynamic changes in platelet count, sCD-40 ligand and sP-selectin occur over time among patients with ACS. Platelet-directed therapy with a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor in combination with aspirin modestly impacts the expression of these biomarkers. Platelet count and sCD40 ligand may offer modest overall predictive value for future ischemic-thrombotic or hemorrhagic clinical events, respectively. The existence of a platelet adaptome and its overall clinical significance among patients at risk for thrombotic events will require a more in-depth and platelet-biology specific investigation.

Keywords

Acute coronary syndrome P2Y12 inhibitor Ticagrelor Platelet adaptome 

Notes

Funding

The PLATO study was funded by AstraZeneca. Support for the analysis and interpretation of the results and preparation for the manuscript was provided through funds to the Uppsala Clinical Research Center and Duke Clinical Research Institute as part of the Clinical Study Agreement.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

RFS: Institutional Research Grants, consultancy fees, honoraria and travel support from AstraZeneca; consultancy fees from Aspen, PlaqueTec, The Medicines Company, ThermoFisher Scientific, Correvio, Bayer; travel support from Medtronic. DJA: has received payment as an individual for: (a) Consulting fee or honorarium from Amgen, Bayer, Sanofi, Eli Lilly, Daiichi-Sankyo, The Medicines Company, AstraZeneca, Merck, Pfizer, Abbott Vascular and PLx Pharma; (b) Participation in review activities from CeloNova, Johnson & Johnson, St. Jude Medical. Institutional payments for grants from GlaxoSmithKline, Eli Lilly, Daiichi-Sankyo, The Medicines Company, AstraZeneca, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Osprey Medical, Inc., Novartis, CSL Behring, Gilead. CPC: Grants and personal fees from Amgen, Arisaph, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck, and Takeda; personal fees from AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Kowa, Lipimedix, Pfizer, Regeneron, Sanofi, Janssen; grants from Daiichi-Sankyo, Janssen. AH: Reports being an employee of AstraZeneca. KH: Lecture fees and research grant from AstraZeneca; lecture fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb/Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bayer, Daiichi Sankyo, Sanofi Aventis, The Medicines Company. SKJ: Institutional Research Grant, honoraria and consultant/advisory board fee from AstraZeneca; Institutional Research Grant and consultant/advisory board fee from Medtronic; Institutional Research Grants and honoraria from The Medicines Company; consultant/advisory board fees from Janssen, Bayer. HAK: Personal fees from AstraZeneca, Bayer Vital, Roche Diagnostics. JM: Research Grant from Servier, consultant and speaker fees from AstraZeneca, Bayer Healthcare, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Boehringer Ingelheim, Jaba Recordati, Pfizer/Bristol-Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo; speaker fees from Amgen, AstraZeneca. AS: Institutional Research Grants from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb/Pfizer and GlaxoSmithKline. PGS: research grant and speaking, or consulting fees from Merck, Sanofi, Servier; speaking or consulting fees from Amarin, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, CSL-Behring, Daiichi Sankyo, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, The Medicines Company. LW: Institutional Research Grants, consultancy fees, lecture fees, and travel support from Bristol-Myers Squibb/Pfizer, AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Boehringer Ingelheim; Institutional Research Grants from Merck & Co, Roche; consultancy fees from Abbott; holds two patents involving GDF-15. RCB: Scientific advisory board member for Janssen, Ionis Pharmaceuticals, and AstraZeneca; safety reviewing committee member for Portola. AL, MN, J-LA: Nothing to disclose.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This study does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Gachet C (2008) P2 receptors, platelet function and pharmacological implications. Thromb Haemost 99(3):466–472PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Voora D et al (2012) Time-dependent changes in non-COX-1-dependent platelet function with daily aspirin therapy. J Thromb Thrombolysis 33(3):246–257CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Storey RF et al (2010) Inhibitory effects of ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel on platelet function in patients with acute coronary syndromes: the PLATO (PLATelet inhibition and patient Outcomes) PLATELET substudy. J Am Coll Cardiol 56(18):1456–1462CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wallentin L et al (2009) Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med 361(11):1045–1057CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    James S et al (2009) Comparison of ticagrelor, the first reversible oral P2Y(12) receptor antagonist, with clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes: Rationale, design, and baseline characteristics of the PLATelet inhibition and patient Outcomes (PLATO) trial. Am Heart J 157(4):599–605CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Storey RF et al (2014) Lower mortality following pulmonary adverse events and sepsis with ticagrelor compared to clopidogrel in the PLATO study. Platelets 25(7):517–525CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bjorquist A et al (2016) Studies of the interaction of ticagrelor with the P2Y13 receptor and with P2Y13-dependent pro-platelet formation by human megakaryocytes. Thromb Haemost 116(6):1079–1088CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Massimi I et al (2014) Aspirin influences megakaryocytic gene expression leading to up-regulation of multidrug resistance protein-4 in human platelets. Br J Clin Pharmacol 78(6):1343–1353CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pulcinelli FM et al (2004) Inhibition of platelet aggregation by aspirin progressively decreases in long-term treated patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 43(6):979–984CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cattaneo M et al (2003) Molecular bases of defective signal transduction in the platelet P2Y12 receptor of a patient with congenital bleeding. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100(4):1978–1983CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Shiraga M et al (2005) Impaired platelet function in a patient with P2Y12 deficiency caused by a mutation in the translation initiation codon. J Thromb Haemost 3(10):2315–2323CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nergiz-Unal R et al (2010) Stabilizing role of platelet P2Y(12) receptors in shear-dependent thrombus formation on ruptured plaques. PLoS ONE 5(4):e10130CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Angela Lowenstern
    • 1
  • Robert F. Storey
    • 2
  • Megan Neely
    • 1
  • Jie-Lena Sun
    • 1
  • Dominick J. Angiolillo
    • 3
  • Christopher P. Cannon
    • 4
  • Anders Himmelmann
    • 5
  • Kurt Huber
    • 6
    • 7
  • Stefan K. James
    • 8
    • 9
  • Hugo A. Katus
    • 10
  • Joao Morais
    • 11
  • Agneta Siegbahn
    • 9
    • 12
  • Phillippe Gabriel Steg
    • 13
    • 14
    • 15
    • 16
  • Lars Wallentin
    • 8
    • 9
  • Richard C. Becker
    • 17
  • On behalf of the PLATO Investigators
  1. 1.Duke Clinical Research InstituteDuke University, Medical CenterDurhamUSA
  2. 2.Department of Infection, Immunity and Cardiovascular DiseaseUniversity of SheffieldSheffieldUK
  3. 3.Division of CardiologyUniversity of Florida College of Medicine-JacksonvilleJacksonvilleUSA
  4. 4.Cardiovascular DivisionBrigham and Women’s HospitalBostonUSA
  5. 5.AstraZeneca Research and DevelopmentGothenburgSweden
  6. 6.3rd Department of Medicine, Cardiology and Intensive CareWilhelminen HospitalViennaAustria
  7. 7.Sigmund Freud Private University, Medical SchoolViennaAustria
  8. 8.Department of Medical Sciences, CardiologyUppsala UniversityUppsalaSweden
  9. 9.Uppsala Clinical Research CenterUppsala UniversityUppsalaSweden
  10. 10.Medizinishe KlinikUniversitätsklinikum HeidelbergHeidelbergGermany
  11. 11.Leiria Hospital CentreLeiriaPortugal
  12. 12.Department of Medical Sciences, Clinical ChemistryUppsala UniversityUppsalaSweden
  13. 13.Département Hospitalo-Universitaire FIRE, AP-HPHôpital BichatParisFrance
  14. 14.Paris Diderot University, Sorbonne Paris CitéParisFrance
  15. 15.NHLI Imperial College, ICMSRoyal Brompton HospitalLondonUK
  16. 16.FACT (French Alliance for Cardiovascular Trials), an F-CRIN networkINSERM U1148ParisFrance
  17. 17.Division of Cardiovascular Health and Disease, Heart, Lung and Vascular InstituteUniversity of Cincinnati College of MedicineCincinnatiUSA

Personalised recommendations