Advertisement

Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis

, Volume 43, Issue 3, pp 333–342 | Cite as

Influence of low-dose proton pump inhibitors administered concomitantly or separately on the anti-platelet function of clopidogrel

  • Takahisa Furuta
  • Mitsushige Sugimoto
  • Chise Kodaira
  • Masafumi Nishino
  • Mihoko Yamade
  • Takahiro Uotani
  • Shu Sahara
  • Hitomi Ichikawa
  • Takuma Kagami
  • Moriya Iwaizumi
  • Yasushi Hamaya
  • Satoshi Osawa
  • Ken Sugimoto
  • Kazuo Umemura
Article

Abstract

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) at low doses can effectively prevent gastrointestinal bleeding due to aspirin and are widely used in Japan for gastroprotection in patients taking anti-platelet agents. We examined the influence of different PPIs at low doses administered concomitantly or separately on anti-platelet functions of clopidogrel. In 41 healthy Japanese volunteers with different CYP2C19 genotypes who took clopidogrel 75 mg in the morning alone, or with omeprazole 10 mg, esomeprazole 10 mg, lansoprazole 15 mg, or rabeprazole 10 mg, either concomitantly in the morning or separately in the evening, we measured the inhibition of platelet aggregation (IPA, %) using VerifyNow P2Y12 assay at 4 h after the last clopidogrel dose on Day 7 of each regimen. IPA by clopidogrel with rabeprazole administered at lunchtime, approximately 4 h after clopidogrel, was also measured. Mean IPAs in those concomitantly receiving omeprazole, esomeprazole, lansoprazole or rabeprazole (47.2 ± 21.1%, 43.2 ± 20.2%, 46.4 ± 18.8%, and 47.3 ± 19.2%, respectively) were significantly decreased compared with those receiving clopidogrel alone (56.0%) (all ps < 0.001). This decrease was observed when PPIs were administered separately in the evening. However, IPA by clopidogrel with rabeprazole administered at lunchtime was 51.6%, which was markedly similar to that of clopidogrel alone (p = 0.114). All tested PPIs reduce the efficacy of clopidogrel when administered concomitantly. Our preliminary data suggest that administration of rabeprazole 4 h following clopidogrel may minimize potential drug–drug interactions.

Keywords

Clopidogrel CYP2C19 Platelet function Proton pump inhibitor Omeprazole Esomeprazole Lansoprazole Rabeprazole Drug–drug interaction Genotype 

Abbreviations

CYP2C19

Cytochrome p450 2C19

CYP3A4

Cytochrome p450 3A4

IM

Intermediate metabolizer

IPA

Inhibition of platelet aggregation

PM

Poor metabolizer

RM

Rapid metabolizer

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a grant-in-aid from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan (20590718). We thank the staff at the Translational Research Unit, Ms. Takako Toyoda, Ms. Junko Kuroki, Ms. Yoko Akahori, Ms. Yumi Kiyama, Ms Keiko Arasawa, Ms. Saori Oikawa and Ms. Naomi Hashimoto for their help.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

None of the authors had any conflict of interest related to this study.

References

  1. 1.
    Milionis H, Michel P (2013) Acute ischemic cerebrovascular events on antiplatelet therapy: what is the optimal prevention strategy? Curr Pharm Des 19:3788–3794CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gouya G, Arrich J, Wolzt M et al (2014) Antiplatelet treatment for prevention of cerebrovascular events in patients with vascular diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Stroke 45:492–503CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Derry S, Loke YK (2000) Risk of gastrointestinal haemorrhage with long term use of aspirin: meta-analysis. Bmj 321:1183–1187CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chan FK, Ching JY, Hung LC et al (2005) Clopidogrel versus aspirin and esomeprazole to prevent recurrent ulcer bleeding. N Engl J Med 352:238–244CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hallas J, Dall M, Andries A et al (2006) Use of single and combined antithrombotic therapy and risk of serious upper gastrointestinal bleeding: population based case-control study. Bmj 333:726CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Awtry EH, Loscalzo J (2000) Aspirin. Circulation 101:1206–1218CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nakayama M, Iwakiri R, Hara M et al (2009) Low-dose aspirin is a prominent cause of bleeding ulcers in patients who underwent emergency endoscopy. J Gastroenterol 44:912–918CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bhatt DL, Scheiman J, Abraham NS et al (2008) ACCF/ACG/AHA 2008 expert consensus document on reducing the gastrointestinal risks of antiplatelet therapy and NSAID use: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents. Circulation 118:1894–1909CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Iwakiri R, Higuchi K, Kato M et al (2014) Randomised clinical trial: prevention of recurrence of peptic ulcers by rabeprazole in patients taking low-dose aspirin. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 40:780–795CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sugano K, Matsumoto Y, Itabashi T et al (2011) Lansoprazole for secondary prevention of gastric or duodenal ulcers associated with long-term low-dose aspirin therapy: results of a prospective, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, double-dummy, active-controlled trial. J Gastroenterol 46:724–735CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hulot JS, Bura A, Villard E et al (2006) Cytochrome P450 2C19 loss-of-function polymorphism is a major determinant of clopidogrel responsiveness in healthy subjects. Blood 108:2244–2247CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Umemura K, Furuta T, Kondo K (2008) The common gene variants of CYP2C19 affect pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in an active metabolite of clopidogrel in healthy subjects. J Thromb Haemost 6:1439–1441CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Furuta T, Shirai N, Sugimoto M et al (2004) Pharmacogenomics of proton pump inhibitors. Pharmacogenomics 5:181–202CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Stedman CA, Barclay ML (2000) Review article: comparison of the pharmacokinetics, acid suppression and efficacy of proton pump inhibitors. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 14:963–978CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Juurlink DN, Gomes T, Ko DT et al (2009) A population-based study of the drug interaction between proton pump inhibitors and clopidogrel. CMAJ 180:713–718CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ho PM, Maddox TM, Wang L et al (2009) Risk of adverse outcomes associated with concomitant use of clopidogrel and proton pump inhibitors following acute coronary syndrome. JAMA 301:937–944CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Toth PP, Armani A (2009) Thienopyridine therapy and risk for cardiovascular events in secondary prevention. Curr Atheroscler Rep 11:364–370CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Siller-Matula JM, Spiel AO, Lang IM et al (2009) Effects of pantoprazole and esomeprazole on platelet inhibition by clopidogrel. Am Heart J 157:148e1–e5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    O’Donoghue ML, Braunwald E, Antman EM et al (2009) Pharmacodynamic effect and clinical efficacy of clopidogrel and prasugrel with or without a proton-pump inhibitor: an analysis of two randomised trials. Lancet 374:989–997CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bhatt DL, Cryer BL, Contant CF et al (2010) Clopidogrel with or without omeprazole in coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 363:1909–1917CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Malek LA, Kisiel B, Spiewak M et al (2008) Coexisting polymorphisms of P2Y12 and CYP2C19 genes as a risk factor for persistent platelet activation with clopidogrel. Circ J 72:1165–1169CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Simon T, Verstuyft C, Mary-Krause M et al (2009) Genetic determinants of response to clopidogrel and cardiovascular events. N Engl J Med 360:363–375CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mega JL, Close SL, Wiviott SD et al (2009) Cytochrome p-450 polymorphisms and response to clopidogrel. N Engl J Med 360:354–362CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Collet JP, Hulot JS, Pena A et al (2009) Cytochrome P450 2C19 polymorphism in young patients treated with clopidogrel after myocardial infarction: a cohort study. Lancet 373:309–317CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Furuta T, Iwaki T, Umemura K (2010) Influences of different proton pump inhibitors on the anti-platelet function of clopidogrel in relation to CYP2C19 genotypes. Br J Clin Pharmacol 70:383–392CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Gilard M, Arnaud B, Cornily JC et al (2008) Influence of omeprazole on the antiplatelet action of clopidogrel associated with aspirin: the randomized, double-blind OCLA (Omeprazole CLopidogrel Aspirin) study. J Am Coll Cardiol 51:256–260CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Nishino M, Sugimoto M, Kodaira C et al (2011) Preventive effects of lansoprazole and famotidine on gastric mucosal injury induced by low-dose aspirin in Helicobacter pylori-negative healthy volunteers. J Clin Pharmacol 51:1079–1086CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Graham DY, Agrawal NM, Campbell DR et al (2002) Ulcer prevention in long-term users of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: results of a double-blind, randomized, multicenter, active- and placebo-controlled study of misoprostol vs. lansoprazole. Arch Intern Med 162:169–175CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Uotani T, Sugimoto M, Nishino M et al (2012) Ability of rabeprazole to prevent gastric mucosal damage from clopidogrel and low doses of aspirin depends on CYP2C19 genotype. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 10:879–885e2CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Nagashima K (2013) A sample size estimation tool for the paired t test (internet). http://nshi.jp/contents/js/pairedmean/ (in Japanese)
  31. 31.
    Furuta T, Sagehashi Y, Shirai N et al (2005) Influence of CYP2C19 polymorphism and Helicobacter pylori genotype determined from gastric tissue samples on response to triple therapy for H. pylori Infection. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 3:564–573CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sim SC, Risinger C, Dahl ML et al (2006) A common novel CYP2C19 gene variant causes ultrarapid drug metabolism relevant for the drug response to proton pump inhibitors and antidepressants. Clin Pharmacol Ther 79:103–113CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kubota T, Chiba K, Ishizaki T (1996) Genotyping of S-mephenytoin 4′-hydroxylation in an extended Japanese population. Clin Pharmacol Ther 60:661–666CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Furuta T, Shirai N, Takashima M et al (2001) Effect of genotypic differences in CYP2C19 on cure rates for Helicobacter pylori infection by triple therapy with a proton pump inhibitor, amoxicillin, and clarithromycin. Clin Pharmacol Ther 69:158–168CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Zvyaga T, Chang SY, Chen C et al (2012) Evaluation of six proton pump inhibitors as inhibitors of various human cytochromes P450: focus on cytochrome P450 2C19. Drug Metab Dispos 40:1698–1711CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Ishizaki T, Chiba K, Manabe K et al (1995) Comparison of the interaction potential of a new proton pump inhibitor, E3810, versus omeprazole with diazepam in extensive and poor metabolizers of S-mephenytoin 4′-hydroxylation. Clin Pharmacol Ther 58:155–164CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Siriswangvat S, Sansanayudh N, Nathisuwan S et al (2010) Comparison between the effect of omeprazole and rabeprazole on the antiplatelet action of clopidogrel. Circ J 74:2187–2192CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Sibbing D, Morath T, Stegherr J et al (2009) Impact of proton pump inhibitors on the antiplatelet effects of clopidogrel. Thromb Haemost 101:714–719PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Wu J, Jia LT, Shao LM et al (2013) Drug–drug interaction of rabeprazole and clopidogrel in healthy Chinese volunteers. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 69:179–187CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Funck-Brentano C, Szymezak J, Steichen O et al (2013) Effects of rabeprazole on the antiplatelet effects and pharmacokinetics of clopidogrel in healthy volunteers. Arch Cardiovasc Dis 106:661–671CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Li XQ, Andersson TB, Ahlstrom M et al (2004) Comparison of inhibitory effects of the proton pump-inhibiting drugs omeprazole, esomeprazole, lansoprazole, pantoprazole, and rabeprazole on human cytochrome P450 activities. Drug Metab Dispos 32:821–827CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Furuta T, Ohashi K, Kosuge K et al (1999) CYP2C19 genotype status and effect of omeprazole on intragastric pH in humans. Clin Pharmacol Ther 65:552–561CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Shirai N, Furuta T, Xiao F et al (2002) Comparison of lansoprazole and famotidine for gastric acid inhibition during the daytime and night-time in different CYP2C19 genotype groups. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 16:837–846CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Shirai N, Furuta T, Moriyama Y et al (2001) Effects of CYP2C19 genotypic differences in the metabolism of omeprazole and rabeprazole on intragastric pH. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 15:1929–1937CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Takahisa Furuta
    • 1
  • Mitsushige Sugimoto
    • 2
  • Chise Kodaira
    • 2
  • Masafumi Nishino
    • 2
  • Mihoko Yamade
    • 3
  • Takahiro Uotani
    • 2
  • Shu Sahara
    • 2
  • Hitomi Ichikawa
    • 2
  • Takuma Kagami
    • 2
  • Moriya Iwaizumi
    • 2
  • Yasushi Hamaya
    • 2
  • Satoshi Osawa
    • 4
  • Ken Sugimoto
    • 2
  • Kazuo Umemura
    • 5
  1. 1.Center for Clinical ResearchHamamatsu University School of MedicineShizuokaJapan
  2. 2.First Department of MedicineHamamatsu University School of MedicineShizuokaJapan
  3. 3.Department of Clinical OncologyHamamatsu University School of MedicineShizuokaJapan
  4. 4.Department of Endoscopic and Photodynamic MedicineHamamatsu University School of MedicineShizuokaJapan
  5. 5.Department of PharmacologyHamamatsu University School of MedicineShizuokaJapan

Personalised recommendations