Bleeding associated with current therapies for acute coronary syndrome: What are the mechanisms?
- First Online:
- 154 Downloads
Coronary artery plaque rupture results in platelet adhesion and activation, the release of adenosine diphosphate (ADP), thromboxane A2, and the generation of thrombin. These factors propagate further platelet activation through a positive feedback mechanism, resulting in the formation of a platelet plug. The treatment of patients with ACS is centered upon the prompt initiation of both antiplatelet and anticoagulant agents. The widespread use of antiplatelet and anticoagulant agents has resulted in a significant reduction in morbidity and mortality but has also increased the risk for bleeding complications. Female gender, advanced age, low body mass index (BMI), low creatinine clearance, and the use of percutaneous coronary intervention have been consistently shown to be risk factors for bleeding. While bleeding was thought to be a necessary side effect and of little clinical significance in the past, it is now clear that bleeding is an independent predictor of adverse ischemic events and mortality. The mechanisms underlying this relationship are not yet fully elucidated and are likely multifactorial (direct effects of bleeding, increased incidence of blood transfusions, less use of antiplatelet agents in both the short and long term). Current treatment guidelines for the use of antithrombotic therapy recommend utilization of evidence-based therapies using clinical strategies shown to minimize the risk of bleeding should when possible. Novel therapies that minimize bleeding risk while providing protection against thrombotic events are needed and may improve outcomes among patients with ACS.
Multiple platelet activation pathways and the coagulation cascade regulate hemostasis and thrombosis. Current antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapies for acute coronary syndromes (ACS) act on distinct sites in the pathways for platelet activation and coagulation. While these therapies are effective in reducing the morbidity and mortality associated with ACS, they are associated with a clinically significant increase in the risk of bleeding events. Novel therapies that minimize bleeding risk while providing protection against thrombotic events may improve outcomes in patients with ACS.
KeywordsAcute coronary syndrome Hemorrhage Anti-coagulation agents Anti-platelet agents Platelet aggregation Coagulation
- 1.Antman EM, Anbe DT, Armstrong PW et al (2004) ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Revise the 1999 Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction)Google Scholar
- 2.Anderson JL et al (2007) ACC/AHA 2007 guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina/non ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Unstable Angina/Non ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction) Developed in Collaboration with the American College of Emergency Physicians, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Endorsed by the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation and the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine. J Am Coll Cardiol 50(7):e1–e157Google Scholar
- 5.Fauci AS (2008) Harrison’s principles of internal medicine, 17th edn. McGraw-Hill Medical, New York, 2 vols, xxxvii, 2754 p, 149 pGoogle Scholar
- 6.Guyton AC, Hall JE (2006) Textbook of medical physiology, 11th edn. Elsevier Saunders, Philadelphia, xxxv, 1116 pGoogle Scholar
- 16.Subherwal S et al (2009) Baseline risk of major bleeding in non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction: the CRUSADE (Can Rapid risk stratification of Unstable angina patients Suppress ADverse outcomes with Early implementation of the ACC/AHA Guidelines) Bleeding Score. Circulation 119(14):1873–1882CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 21.Randomised trial of intravenous streptokinase, oral aspirin, both, or neither among 17,187 cases of suspected acute myocardial infarction: ISIS-2. ISIS-2 (Second International Study of Infarct Survival) Collaborative Group. Lancet 2(8607):349–360 (1988)Google Scholar
- 22.Kushner FG et al (2009) focused updates: ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (updating the 2004 guideline and 2007 focused update) and ACC/AHA/SCAI guidelines on percutaneous coronary intervention (updating the 2005 guideline and 2007 focused update) a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 54(23):2205–2241CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 24.Fox KA et al (2004) Benefits and risks of the combination of clopidogrel and aspirin in patients undergoing surgical revascularization for non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome: the Clopidogrel in Unstable angina to prevent Recurrent ischemic Events (CURE) trial. Circulation 110(10):1202–1208CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 27.Novel dosing regimen of eptifibatide in planned coronary stent implantation (ESPRIT): a randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 356(9247):2037–2044 (2000)Google Scholar
- 28.Inhibition of platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa with eptifibatide in patients with acute coronary syndromes. The PURSUIT Trial Investigators. Platelet Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa in Unstable Angina: Receptor Suppression Using Integrilin Therapy. N Engl J Med 339(7):436–443 (1998)Google Scholar
- 29.Collaborative meta-analysis of randomised trials of antiplatelet therapy for prevention of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke in high risk patients. BMJ 324(7329):71–86 (2002)Google Scholar
- 37.Budaj A et al (2009) Improving clinical outcomes by reducing bleeding in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J 30(6):655–661Google Scholar
- 43.Greenbaum AB et al (2006) Initial experience with an intravenous P2Y12 platelet receptor antagonist in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: results from a 2-part, phase II, multicenter, randomized, placebo- and active-controlled trial. Am Heart J 151(3):689e1–689e10Google Scholar