Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis

, Volume 22, Issue 1, pp 55–67 | Cite as

Host-guest composites for induced hemostasis and therapeutic healing in traumatic injuries

  • Todd A. Ostomel
  • Peter K. Stoimenov
  • Patricia A. Holden
  • Hasan B. Alam
  • Galen D. Stucky
Basic and Translational Science


Introduction: The United States military currently outfits our soldiers with a zeolite-based hemostatic agent (HA) that is applied directly onto a traumatic wound to induce hemostasis and prevent loss of life from exsanguination. The goals of this work were to identify and implement strategies to attenuate a tissue burning side effect associated with the HA, resulting from a large release of heat upon hydration, without adversely affecting the wound healing properties. Five ion exchanged derivatives of the parent HA were prepared and characterized with regard to their material and thermal properties, in vitro hemostatic efficacy, and antibacterial activity.

Methods: The five host-guest high-surface-area HAs were prepared by ion exchanging the zeolite linde type 5A with aqueous salt solutions under controlled conditions. The modified HAs were characterized by TGA, DSC, Thermal Imaging, SEM, XRD, XPS, BET, and a Thromboelastograph® (TEG®) was employed to assay the in vitro hemostatic efficacy. Antibacterial activity was assayed by measuring the zone of no growth of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms growing in contact with the ion exchanged HAs.

Results: The heat released during application of the HA can be minimized from 680 J/g to 420 J/g by ion exchanging the calcium ions in zeolite linde type 5A with cations of a reduced hydration enthalpy. Zeolite-based HAs that demonstrate in vitro clot induction time of R ≤ 1.8 min, and with surfaces areas ≥ 634 m2/g, correlate with 75% in vivo swine survivability of a universally lethal groin injury. Silver exchanged HA maintained a zone of no growth of P. aeruginosa with a surface area twice the geometrical surface area of an HA pressed pellet for 24 hours in an LB Agar assay.

Conclusions: Two strategies for reducing the large amount of heat released by a zeolite-based HA during application have been described and quantified: (1) ion exchange and (2) prehydration. Five ion-exchanged derivatives of the original HA have been prepared and assayed for hemostatic efficacy both in vitro, by TEG®, and in vivo, by clinical swine trials. Contact activation coagulation rates, α, were found to increase with the amount of heat released by the HA. In Vitro clot induction time, R, and HA surface area have been identified as predictors of in vivo hemostatic performance. A proposed rationale for selecting hemostatic materials based on these parameters will likely reduce the quantity of experiments involving animals, and the associated labor and capital costs, necessary to test a new HA. A method for incorporating antibacterial activity against gram negative P. aeruginosa into the Ag-exchanged formulation of zeolite LTA-5A has been described and substantiated.


Hemostatic agent Thromboelastograph Zeolites Traumatic injury Battlefield injury Hemorrhage Swine Femoral vessels Groin Bandages 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Ryan KL, Kheirabad B, Klemke HG, Martini W, Delgado AV, Pusateri AE (2003) Overview of the hemostasis research program: advances and future directions. Army Medical Department Journal PB-8-03-7/8/9:12–25Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alam HB, Chen Z, Jaskille A, et al (2004) Application of a zeolite hemostatic agent achieves 100% survival in a lethal model of complex groin injury in swine. J TRAUMA 56(5):974–983PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Neuffer Marcus C, McDivitt J, Rose D, King K, Cloonan Clifford C, Vayer Joshua S (2004) Hemostatic dressings for the first responder: a review. MIL MED 169(9):716–20PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hursey FX, Dechene FJ (1989) inventors; Method of Treating Wounds. United States of America patent #4,822,349Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Z-Medica I. In: Newington, CT.
  6. 6.
    Wright James K, Kalns J, Wolf Edward A, et al (2004) Thermal injury resulting from application of a granular mineral hemostatic agent. J TRAUM 57(2):224–30Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ostomel TA, Stoimenov PK, Holden PA, Stucky GD, (2005) inventors; Porous Inorganic Materials for Therapeutic Wound Healing. United States patent application #60/668,022Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Breck DW (1974) Zeolite molecular sieves, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Barrer RM (1978) Zeolites and clay minerals as sorbents and molecular sieves. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Vig S, Chitolie A, Bevan DH, Halliday A, Dormandy J (2001) Thromboelastography: a reliable test? Blood Coagulation Fibrinolysis 12(7):555–561PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Morey TE, Varshney M, Flint JA, et al (2004) Activity of microemulsion-based nanoparticles at the human bio-nano interface: concentration-dependent effects on thrombosis and hemolysis in whole blood. Journal of Nanoparticle Research 6(2–3):159–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lee D-W, Baney RH (2004) Oligochitosan derivatives bearing electron- deficientaromaticringsforadsorptionofamitriptyline: implicationsfordrugdetoxification. Biomacromolecules 5:1310–1315PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ames WA, McDonnell N, Potter D (1999) The effect of ionised magnesium on coagulation using thromboelastography. Anaesthesia 549(10):999–1001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Francis JL, Francis DA, Gunathilagan GJ (1994) Assessment of hypercoagulability in patients with cancer using the sonoclot-analyzer(Tm) and thromboelastography. Thrombosis Research 74(4):335–346PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Drebushchak VA (1999) Measurements of heat of zeolite dehydration by scanning heating. J Therm Anal Calorim 58(3):653–662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Doria C, Mandala L, Smith Jan D, et al (2004) Thromboelastography used to assess coagulation during treatment with molecular adsorbent recirculating system. Clin Transplant 18(4):365–71PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Glidden PF, Malaska C, Herring SW (2000) Thromboelastograph assay for measuring the mechanical strength of fibrin sealant clots. Clin Appl Thromb-Hem 6(4):226–233Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gorton H, Lyons G (1999) Is it time to invest in a thromboelastograph? Int J Obstet Anesth 8(30):171–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Klein SM, Slaughter TF, Vail PT, et al (2000) Thromboelastography as a perioperative measure of anticoagulation resulting from low molecular weight heparin: A comparison with anti-Xa concentrations. Anesth Analg 91(5):1091–1095PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Salooja N, Perry DJ (2001) Thrombelastography. Blood Coagul Fibrin 12(5):327–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Alam Hasan B (2005) Zeolite hemostatic dressing: battlefield use. In: Advanced technology applications for combat casualty care (ATACCC0); 2005 August 15–17; St. Petersburg, FLGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Goodman SL (1999) Sheep, pig, and human platelet-material interactions with model cardiovascular biomaterials. J Biomed Mater Res 45(3):240–250PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Alam HB, Kheirabadi BS (2005) Hemostatic efficacy of two advanced dressings in an aortic hemorrhage model in swine—Discussion. J TRAUMA 59(1):34–35Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Alam HB, Uy GB, Miller D, et al (2003) Comparative analysis of hemostatic agents in a swine model of lethal groin injury. J TRAUMA 54(6):1077–1082PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Breck DW, Eversole WG, Milton RM, Reed TB, Thomas TL (1956) Crystalline Zeolites .1. The Properties of a New Synthetic Zeolite, Type-A. J Am Chem Soc 78(23):5963–5971CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Reed TB, Breck DW (1956) Crystalline Zeolites .2. Crystal Structure of Synthetic Zeolite, Type-A. J Am Chem Soc 78(23):5972–5977CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Davie EW, Ratnoff OD (1964) Waterfall sequence for intrinsic blood clotting. Science 145(363):1310–1312PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Xu C, Zeng YJ, Gregerson H (2002) Dynamic Model for the Role of Platelets in the Blood Coagulation System. Med Eng Phys 24:587–593PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Colman RW, Schmaier AH (1997) Contact system: A vascular biology modulator with anticoagulant, profibrinolytic, antiadhesive, and proinflammatory attributes. Blood 90(10):3819–3843PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wolberg AS, Meng ZH, Monroe DM, Hoffman M (2004) A systematic evaluation of the effect of temperature on coagulation enzyme activity and platelet function. J Trauma 56(6):1221–1228PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Helfferich F (1962) Ion exchange. McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc., New YorkGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hoffman M (2003) Remodeling the blood coagulation cascade. J Thromb Thrombolys 16(1–2):17–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kawahara K, Tsuruda K, Morishita M, Uchida M (2000) Antibacterial effect of silver-zeolite on oral bacteria under anaerobic conditions. Dent Mater 16(6):452–455PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Morishita M, Miyagi M, Yamasaki Y, Tsuruda K, Kawahara K, Iwamoto O (1998) Pilot study on the effect of a mouthrinse containing silver zeolite on plaque formation. J Clin Dent 9(4): 94–96PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Morishita M, Miyagi M, Yamasaki Y, Tsuruda K, Kawahara K, Iwamoto Y (1998) Effect of silver zeolite on plaque formation. J Dent Res 77:845–845Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Nikawa H, Yamamoto T, Hamada T, Rahardjo MD, Murata H, Nakanoda S (1997) Antifungal effect of zeolite-incorporated tissue conditioner against Candida albicans growth and/or acid production. J Oral Rehabil 24(5):350–357PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Todd A. Ostomel
    • 1
    • 4
  • Peter K. Stoimenov
    • 1
    • 4
  • Patricia A. Holden
    • 2
    • 4
  • Hasan B. Alam
    • 3
    • 4
  • Galen D. Stucky
    • 1
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Chemistry and BiochemistryUniversity of California Santa BarbaraSanta Barbara
  2. 2.Donald Bren School of Environmental Science and ManagementUniversity of California Santa BarbaraSanta Barbara
  3. 3.Department of SurgeryUniformed Services University of the Health SciencesBethesda
  4. 4.Massachusetts General Hospital, Division of TraumaEmergency Surgery and Surgical Critical CareBoston

Personalised recommendations