Theory and Decision

, Volume 73, Issue 3, pp 453–464 | Cite as

Attitudes toward uncertainty among the poor: an experiment in rural Ethiopia

  • Alpaslan Akay
  • Peter Martinsson
  • Haileselassie Medhin
  • Stefan T. Trautmann
Open Access
Article

Abstract

We investigate risk and ambiguity attitudes among Ethiopian farmers in one of the poorest regions of the world. Strong risk aversion and ambiguity aversion were found with the Ethiopian farmers. We compared their attitudes to those of a Western university student sample elicited by the same decision task. Ambiguity aversion was similar for farmers and students, but farmers were more risk averse. Our results show that ambiguity aversion is not restricted to Western student populations, and that studies of agricultural decisions may benefit from explicitly considering ambiguity attitudes.

Keywords

Risk attitudes Ambiguity attitudes Poverty Agriculture 

JEL Classification

D81 C93 O12 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Financial support from the Swedish Research Council (Vetenskapsrådet), the Jan Wallander and Tom Hedelius Foundation, and Sida (Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency) to the Environmental Economics Unit at the University of Gothenburg is gratefully acknowledged. Trautmann acknowledges financial support by a VENI grant of the Netherlands Foundation for Scientific Research (NWO).

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

References

  1. Abdellaoui M. (2000) Parameter-free elicitation of utility and probability weighting functions. Management Science 46: 1497–1512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abdellaoui, M., Baillon, A., Placido, L., & Wakker, P. P. (2010). The rich domain of uncertainty. American Economic Review, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  3. Binswanger H. P. (1980) Attitudes toward risk: Experimental measurement in rural India. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 62: 395–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bleichrodt H., Pinto J. L. (2000) A parameter-free elicitation of the probability weighting function in medical decision analysis. Management Science 46: 1485–1496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bohnet I., Greig F., Hermann B., Zeckhauser R. (2008) Evidence from Brazil, China, Oman, Switzerland, Turkey, and the United States. American Economic Review 98: 294–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Booij A. S., Van Praag B. M. S., Vande Kuilen G. (2010) A parametric analysis of prospect theory’s functionals for the general population. Theory and Decision 68: 115–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Botzen W. J. W., Vanden Bergh J. C. J. M. (2009) Bounded rationality, climate risk, and insurance: Is there a market for natural disasters. Land Economics 85: 265–278Google Scholar
  8. Cabantous L. (2007) Ambiguity aversion in the field of insurance: Insurers’ attitude to imprecise and conflicting probability estimates. Theory and Decision 62: 219–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carlsson F., Johansson-Stenman O., Martinsson P. (2004) Is transport safety more valuable in the air?. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 28: 147–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chesson H. W., Viscusi W. K. (2003) Commonalities in time and ambiguity aversion for long-term risks. Theory and Decision 54: 57–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cohen M., Jaffray J. Y., Said T. (1985) Individual behavior under risk and uncertainty: An experimental study. Theory and Decision 18: 203–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cohen, M., Tallon, J.-M., & Vergnaud, J.-C. (2010) An experimental investigation of imprecision attitude and its relation with risk attitude and impatience. Theory and Decision, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  13. Corso P., Hammitt J. K., Graham J. D. (2001) Valuing mortality-risk reduction: Using visual aids to improve the validity of contingent valuation. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 23: 165–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dercon S. (1996) Risk, crop choice, and savings: Evidence from Tanzania. Economic Development and Cultural Change 44: 485–513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dillon J. L., Scandizzo P. L. (1978) Risk attitudes of subsistence farmers in Northeast Brazil: A sampling approach. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 60: 425–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Elamin E. M., Rogers L. F. (1992) Estimation and use of risk aversion coefficients for traditional dryland agriculture in western Sudan. Agricultural Economics 7: 155–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ellsberg D. (1961) Risk, ambiguity and the Savage axioms. Quarterly Journal of Economics 75: 643–669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Feder G. (1980) Farm size, risk aversion and the adoption of new technology under uncertainty. Oxford Economic Papers 32: 263–283Google Scholar
  19. Feder G., Just R., Zilberman D. (1985) Adoption of agricultural innovations in developing countries: A survey. Economic Development and Cultural Change 33: 255–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Giordani P. E., Schlag K. H., Zwart S. (2010) Decision makers facing uncertainty: Theory versus evidence. Journal of Economic Psychology 31: 659–675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Halevy Y. (2007) Ellsberg Revisited: An experimental study. Econometrica 75: 503–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Harrison, G. W., Humphrey, S. J., & Verschoor, A. (2010). Choice under uncertainty: Evidence from Ethiopia, India and Uganda. Economic Journal, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  23. Heath C., Tversky A. (1991) Preference and belief: Ambiguity and competence in choice and uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 4: 5–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Henrich J., McElreath R. (2002) Are peasants risk-averse decision makers?. Current Anthropology 43: 172–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hogarth R. M., Kunreuther H. (1985) Ambiguity and insurance decisions. American Economic Review 75: 386–390Google Scholar
  26. Holt C. A., Laury S. K. (2002) Risk aversion and incentive effects. American Economic Review 92: 1644–1655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Humphrey S. J., Verschoor A. (2004) Decision-making under risk among small farmers in East Uganda. Journal of African Economies 13: 44–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jalan J., Ravallion M. (2001) Behavioral responses to risk in rural China. Journal of Development Economics 66: 23–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kahn B. E., Sarin R. K. (1988) Modeling ambiguity in decisions under uncertainty. Journal of Consumer Research 15: 265–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kebede Y. (1992) Risk behaviour and agricultural technologies: The case of producers in central highlands of Ethiopia. Quarterly Journal of International Agriculture 31: 269–284Google Scholar
  31. Keren G. B., Gerritsen L. E. M. (1999) On the robustness and possible accounts of ambiguity aversion. Acta Psychologica 103: 149–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kochar A. (1999) Smoothing consumption by smoothing income: hours-of-work responses to idiosyncratic agricultural shocks in rural India. Review of Economics and Statistics 81: 50–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kocher M. G., Cherry T., Kroll S., Netzer R. J., Sutter M. (2008) Conditional cooperation on three continents. Economics Letters 101: 175–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kuznar L. A. (2001) Risk sensitivity and value among Andean pastoralists: Measures, models, and empirical tests. Current Anthropology 42: 432–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mukerji S., Tallon J.-M. (2001) Ambiguity aversion and incompleteness of financial markets. Review of Economic Studies 68: 883–904CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Muthukrishnan A. V., Wathieu L., Xu A. J. (2009) Ambiguity aversion and persistent preference for established brands. Management Science 55: 1933–1941CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pan L. (2009) Risk pooling through transfers in rural Ethiopia. Economic Development and Cultural Change 57: 809–835CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Peijnenburg, K. (2011). Life-cycle asset allocation with ambiguity aversion and learning. CentER working paper.Google Scholar
  39. Roca M., Hogarth R. M., Maule A. J. (2006) Ambiguity seeking as a result of the status quo bias. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 32: 175–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Roth A. E., Prasnikar V., Okuno-Fujiwara M., Zamir S. (1991) Bargaining and market behavior in Jerusalem, Ljubljana, Pittsburgh, and Tokyo: An experimental study. American Economic Review 81: 1068–1095Google Scholar
  41. Sarin R. K., Weber M. (1993) Effects of ambiguity in market experiments. Management Science 39: 602–615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Trautmann, S. T., Vieider, F. M., & Wakker, P. P. (2011). Preference reversals for ambiguity aversion. Management Science, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  43. Udry C. (1994) Risk and insurance in a rural credit market: An empirical investigation in northern Nigeria. Review of Economic Studies 61: 495–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Yesuf M., Bluffstone R. (2009) Poverty, risk aversion, and path dependence in low income countries: Experimental evidence from Ethiopia. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 91: 1022–1037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Zeckhauser, R. J. (2006). Investing in the unknown and unknowable. Capitalism and Society 1, Article 5.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alpaslan Akay
    • 1
  • Peter Martinsson
    • 2
  • Haileselassie Medhin
    • 2
  • Stefan T. Trautmann
    • 3
  1. 1.IZA (Institute for the Study of Labor)BonnGermany
  2. 2.Department of EconomicsUniversity of GothenburgGöteborgSweden
  3. 3.Department of EconomicsTIBER & CentER, Tilburg UniversityTilburgThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations