A note on negativity bias and framing response asymmetry
An “unprocessed risk” is a collection of simple lotteries with a reduction-rule that describes the actual-payoff to the decision-maker as a function of realized lottery outcomes. Experiments reveal that the willingness to pay for unprocessed risks is consistently biased toward the payoff-level in the unprocessed representation. The “anchoring-to-frame” bias in cases of positive framing is significantly weaker than in cases of negative framing suggesting that rational “negativity bias” may reflect in asymmetric violations of rationality.
KeywordsBounded rationality Framing-invariance Loss-aversion
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Gigerenzer G., Selten R. (2001) Bounded rationality: The adaptive toolbox. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
- Kahneman D. (1994) New challenges to the rationality assumption. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 150(1): 18–36Google Scholar
- Kanouse D. E., Hanson L. R. (1972) Negativity in evaluations. In: Jones E. E.et al. (eds) Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior. General Learning Press, Morristown, NJGoogle Scholar
- Rubinstein A. (1998) Modeling bounded rationality. MIT press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
- Salant, Y. (2007). Procedural analysis of choice rules with applications to bounded rationality. Working paper. Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USAGoogle Scholar
- Simon, H. A. (1986). Rationality in psychology and economics. The Journal of Business, 59(4), Pt. 2, S209–S224.Google Scholar