Features of Cooperative Adsorption Described by Sticking Probability that Depends on the Number of Neighbors
Article
First Online:
Received:
Revised:
- 45 Downloads
The kinetic curves and monolayer clusters on a flat surface for cooperative adsorption, where the probability of sticking of the particles depends on the amount of neighbors on the surface, were calculated by nonequilibrium molecular dynamics. It was found that the type of distribution of the sticking coefficients has a large effect both on the dynamic and on the structural characteristics of the adsorption process. It is shown that the most informative algorithm for classifying the adsorption type is based on the dependence of the fractal dimensionality of the surface structure on the degree of surface coverage.
Key words
cooperative adsorption lateral interactions molecular dynamics fractal analysis kinetics topographic investigations self-similar surface organizationReferences
- 1.A. Dabrowski, Adv. Colloid Interface Sci., 93, 135-224 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.I. Ya. Myasnikov, V. Ya. Sukharev, L. Yu. Kupriyanov, and S. A. Zav’yalov, Semiconducting Sensors in Physicochemical Investigations [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1991).Google Scholar
- 3.V. L. Gromashevskii, N. P. Tat’yanenko, and B. A. Snopok, Teor. Éksp. Khim., 51, No. 3, 163-170 (2015). [Theor. Exp. Chem., 50, No. 3, 170-176 (2015) (English translation).]Google Scholar
- 4.X. Hu, S. L. Crick, G. Bu, et al., PNAS, 106, 20324-20329 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.H. A. Videla and L. K. Herrera, Int. Microbiology, 8, 169-180 (2005).Google Scholar
- 6.B. Leimkuhler and C. Matthews, Molecular Dynamics: with Deterministic and Stochastic Numerical Methods, Springer, London (2015).Google Scholar
- 7.H. D. Höltje, W. Sippl, D. Rognan, and G. Folkers, Molecular Modeling (Theory and Practice) [Russian translation], Laboratoriya Znanii BINOM, Moscow (2010).Google Scholar
- 8.Y. K. Tovbin (ed.), Molecular Dynamics Method in Physical Chemistry [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1996).Google Scholar
- 9.L. Guo, L. Xiao, X. Shan, and X. Zhang, Sci. Rep., 6, 27134 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.B. Chopard and M. Droz, Cellular Automata Modeling of Physical Systems, Cambridge Univ. Press, New York (2005).Google Scholar
- 11.E. G. Manoilov, S. A. Kravchenko, and B. A. Snopok, Optoelektron. Poluprovodn. Tekhn., 51, 135-142 (2016).Google Scholar
- 12.B. A. Snopok, P. N. Boltovets, and F. J. Rowell, Teor. Éksp. Khim., 42, No. 2, 96-101 (2006). [Theor. Exp. Chem., 42, No. 2, 106-112 (2006) (English translation).]Google Scholar
- 13.B. A. Snopok, Teor. Éksp. Khim., 48, No. 5, 265-285 (2012). [Theor. Exp. Chem., 48, No. 5, 283-306 (2012) (English translation).]Google Scholar
- 14.B. B. Mandelbrot, The Fractal Geometry of Nature, Freeman, San Francisco (1982).Google Scholar
- 15.E. Feder, Fractals [Russian translation], Mir, Moscow (1991).Google Scholar
- 16.B. M. Smirnov, Physics of Fractal Clusters [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1991).Google Scholar
- 17.B. A. Snopok, P. E. Strizhak, E. V. Kostyukevich, et al., Semicond. Phys. Quantum Electron. Optoelectron., 2, No. 3, 86-97 (1999).Google Scholar
- 18.P. E. Strizhak, B. A. Snopok, T. Melnik, et al., Proc. of SPIE, 3904, 374-385 (1999) (DOI 10.1117/12.370427).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.K. Falconer, Fractal Geometry: Mathematical Foundations and Applications, John Wiley, Chichester (1990).Google Scholar
- 20.B. A. Snopok, Teor. Éksp. Khim., 50, No. 2, 69-93 (2014). [Theor. Exp. Chem., 50, No. 2, 67-95 (2014) (English translation).]Google Scholar
Copyright information
© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017