Theoretical and Experimental Chemistry

, Volume 41, Issue 2, pp 92–97 | Cite as

Thermodynamic Parameters of the Formation of 3d Transition Metal Complexes as Model Systems for Description of Substrate-Receptor Interaction

  • K. B. Yatsimirskii
  • A. N. Kozachkova
Article
Received:

Abstract

The thermodynamic characteristics of the doubly charged ions of 3d metals with ligands containing oxygen, nitrogen, and fluorine donor atoms are analyzed. The complexing reactions are separated into three main groups on the basis of the changes in the enthalpy and entropy components of the Gibbs free energy. It was shown that the assignation of a reaction to a particular group is determined by the nature of the donor atoms in the ligands. The correlations between the enthalpy and entropy components of the Gibbs free energy and the atomic number of the 3d elements are studied.

Key words

thermodynamics of complexation metal complexes substrate receptor interaction 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    R. M. Smith and A. E. Martell, Critical Stability Constants, Vol. 1–6, Plenum Press, New York (1974–1989).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    J. J. Christensen and R. M. Izatt, Handbook of Metal Ligand Heats and Related Thermodynamic Quantities, Marcel Dekker, New York, Basel (1983).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    H. Irving and R. J. P. Williams, J. Chem. Soc., 3192–3210 (1953).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    M. Chiampolini, P. Paoletti, and L. Sacconi, Nature, 186, No.4728, 880–881 (1960).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    I. Poulsen and J. Bjerrum, Acta Chem. Scand., 9, No.9, 1407–1420 (1955).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    M. Chiampolini, P. Paoletti, and L. Sacconi, J. Chem. Soc., 4553–4561 (1960).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    P. Paoletti, M. Chiampolini, and L. Sacconi, J. Chem. Soc., 3589–3593 (1963).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    R. M. Izatt, H. D. Johnston, and J. J. Christensen, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans., 1152–1157 (1972).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    G. Anderegg, Helv. Chim. Acta, 47, No.7, 1801–1814 (1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    G. Anderegg, Experientia., Supplement, No. 9, 75 (1964).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    D. L. Wright, J. H. Holloway, and C. N. Reilley, Anal. Chem., 37, No.7, 884–892 (1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    V. P. Vasil’ev and A. K. Belonogova, Zh. Neorgan. Khim., 21, No.11, 2982–2986 (1976).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    V. P. Vasil’ev and A. K. Belonogova, Zh. Neorgan. Khim., 22, No.9, 2407–2412 (1977).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    R. Aruga, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans., 2534–2538 (1975).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    L. A. Kul’vinova, V. V. Blokhin, and V. E. Mironov, Zh. Fiz. Khim., 50, No.5, 1287–1288 (1976).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    A. McAuley and G. H. Nancollas, J. Chem. Soc., 989–993 (1963).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    A. McAuley, G. H. Nancollas, and K. Torrace, J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem., 28, No.3, 917–918 (1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    A. McAuley, G. H. Nancollas, and K. Torrace, Inorg. Chem., 6, No.1, 136–138 (1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. B. Yatsimirskii
    • 1
  • A. N. Kozachkova
    • 1
  1. 1.L. V. Pisarzhevskii Institute of Physical ChemistryNational Academy of Sciences of UkraineKyivUkraine

Personalised recommendations