Advertisement

Electronic relay performance in the inband device-to-device (D2D) communication system

  • Rna GhallabEmail author
  • Ali A. Sakr
  • Mona Shokair
  • Atef Abou El-Azm
Article
  • 17 Downloads

Abstract

In this paper, the cooperative electronic relay in device to device (D2D) communication system will be used which is not clarified until now. A scenario in our work will be made by using three types of cooperative diversities together that are compress and forward relay, decode and forward relay (DF) and amplify and forward relay (AF). Numerical results show that, the D2D outage probability of the proposed scheme is lower than that of the traditional relay transmission, which is further reduced with an increasing number of the electronic relays, therefore utilizing number of the electronic relay equal to 8 relays will reduce the outage probability by 0.0024 than using previous relays channel. Moreover using our proposed relay at SNR equal to 25 dB resulting in reducing BER by 4 dB. Moreover, the comparison between using proposed relay and previous research like AF relay with variable gain and DF relay will be carried out, where outage ratio will reduce to 15 dB using our proposed the electronic relay.

Keywords

Cooperative relay network Bit error rate Cellular spectrums Outage ratio Channel estimation 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Sakran, H., Shokair, M., Nasr, O., El-Rabaie, S., & El-Azm, A. A. (2012). Proposed relay selection scheme for physical layer security in Cognitive radio networks. IET Communications, 6, 2676–2687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gandotra, P., & Jha, R. K. (2016). Device-to-device communication in cellular networks: A survey. Networking and Internet Architecture (cs.NI), 71, 99–117.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hicham, M., Abghour, N., & Ouzzif, M. (2016). Device-to-device (D2D) communication under LTE-advanced networks. International Journal of Wireless & Mobile Networks (IJWMN), 8, 11–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pei, Y., & Liang, Y.-C. (2013). Resource allocation for device-to-device communication overlaying two-way cellular networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 12, 3611–3621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Peng, T., Lu, Q., Wang, H., Xu, S., & Wang, W. (2009). Interference avoidance mechanisms in the hybrid cellular and device-to-device systems. In Proceedings of IEEE PIMRC (pp. 617–622).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Elkotby, H. E., Elsayed, K. M., & Ismail, M. H. (2012) Exploiting alignment for sum rate enhancement in D2D-enabled cellular networks. In Proceedings of IEEE WCNC (pp. 1624–1629).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Asadi, A., & Mancuso, V. (2013). Energy efficient opportunistic uplink packet forwarding in hybrid wireless networks. In Proceedings of the fourth international conference on future energy systems (pp. 261–262).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wang, Q., & Rengarajan, B. (2013). Recouping opportunistic gain in dense base station layouts through energy-aware user cooperation. In IEEE 14th international symposium on “a world of wireless, mobile and multimedia networks” (WoWMoM) (pp. 1–9).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ullah, I., Din, F., Chattha, J. N., & Uppal, M. (2016). Compress-and-forward relaying: Prototyping and experimental evaluation using SDRs. In IEEE 84th vehicular technology conference (VTC-Fall) (pp. 1–5).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Razaghi, P., & Yu, W. (2007). Bilayer, low-density parity-check codes for decode-and-forward in relay channels. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 53, 3723–3739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nguyen, V. B., & Kim, K. (2016). Performance analysis of amplify-and-forward systems with single relay selection in correlated environments. Sensors (Basel), 16, 1472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bletsas, A., Shin, H., Win, M. Z., & Lippman, A. (2006). A simple cooperative diversity method based on network path selection. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communication, 24, 659–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Beres, E., & Adve, R. S. (2008). Selection cooperation in multi-source cooperative networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 7, 118–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ghallab, R., & Shokair, M. (2012). Cognitive radio networks with best relay selection method. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Research (JICT), 2, 846–849.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sheble, S., Shokair, M., & Gomaa, A. (2014). Novel construction and optimization of LDPC codes for NC-OFDM cognitive radio systems. Wireless Personal Communication, 79, 69–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dhaliwal, S., Singh, N., & Kaur, G. (2017). Performance analysis of convolutional code over different code rates and constraint length in wireless communication. In IEEE international conference on IoT in social, mobile, analytics and cloud (I-SMAC) (pp. 464–468).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wang, P., Deng, Z., & Chen, C. (2013). Piecewise linear AF in relay-eavesdropper channel with orthogonal components. In 8th international conference on communications and networking in China (CHINACOM) (pp. 917–921).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    El Gamal, A. A., & Zahedi, S. (2005). Capacity of a class of relay channels with orthogonal components. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 51, 1815–1817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gattegno, I. B., Permuter, H. H., Shamai, S. S., & Özgür, A. (2017). Cooperative binning for semi-deterministic channels with non-causal state information. In IEEE symposium on information (ISIT) (pp. 31–35).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Aleksic, M., Razaghi, P., & Yu, W. (2009). Capacity of a class of modulo-sum relay channels. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 55(921–930), 2009.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ghallab, R., & Shokair, M. (2012). Performance of cooperative diversity for CP OFDM based on cognitive relay network. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Research (JICT), 2, 588–594.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Liu, Z., Stankovic, V., & Xiong, Z. (2005). Wyner-ziv coding for the half duplex relay channel. In IEEE international conference on acoustic, speech, and signal processing (pp. 1113–1116).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Joda, R., Erkip, E., & Lahouti, F. (2015). Wyner-Ziv source coding with feedback and uncertain side information. In IEEE Iran workshop on communication and information theory (IWCIT) (pp. 1–6).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rna Ghallab
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ali A. Sakr
    • 1
  • Mona Shokair
    • 1
  • Atef Abou El-Azm
    • 1
  1. 1.Electrical Department, Electrical Communications and Electronics Section, Faculty of EngineeringKafrelsheikh UniversityKafr El-SheikhEgypt

Personalised recommendations