Advertisement

Telecommunication Systems

, Volume 65, Issue 1, pp 31–54 | Cite as

G-FANET: an ambient network formation between ground and flying ad hoc networks

  • Vishal Sharma
  • Rajesh Kumar
Article

Abstract

Networking with aerial vehicles has evolved considerably over a period of time. Its applications range across a wide spectrum covering areas of military and civilian activities. Connectivity between aerial vehicles in ad hoc mode allows formation of multiple control units in the sky which have an ability to handle complex tasks. One of the major applications of these aerial vehicles is to coordinate simultaneously with another ad hoc network operating on the ground. This formation is termed as cooperative ad hoc networking. These networks operate on multiple data-sharing in form of cognitive maps. Thus, an efficient traffic management strategy is required to form a robust network. In this paper, an ambient network framework for coordination between ground and flying ad hoc network is presented. A fault-tolerant and robust connectivity strategy is proposed using neural, fuzzy and genetic modules. quaternion Kalman filter and its variant \(\alpha -\beta -\gamma \) filter is used to form the neural and decision system for guided aerial network. Effectiveness of the proposed traffic management framework for aerial vehicles is presented using mathematical simulations.

Keywords

Quaternion neural model Traffic management Ambient networks Decision support system 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We are very grateful to the EiC, AE, and the anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments and encouragement which helped in improving the overall quality of the paper. We are also highly obliged to the computer science and engineering department of “Thapar University”, Patiala for rendering their incessant help in providing infrastructure and work environment.

References

  1. 1.
    Sharma, V., & Kumar, R. (2014). A cooperative network framework for multi-UAV guided ground ad hoc networks. Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, pp. 1–24.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Buchmayr, M., & Kurschl, W. (2011). A survey on situation-aware ambient intelligence systems. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 2(3), 175–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    De Amicis, R., Conti, G., Piffer, S., & Prandi, F. (2011). Service oriented computing for ambient intelligence to support management of transport infrastructures. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 2(3), 201–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Atmojo, U. D., Salcic, Z., Kevin, I., Wang, K., & Park, H. (2015). System-level approach to the design of ambient intelligence systems based on wireless sensor and actuator networks. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing 6(2), 153–169Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Stavropoulos, Thanos G., Kontopoulos, Efstratios, Bassiliades, Nick, Argyriou, J., Bikakis, A., Vrakas, D., et al. (2015). Rule-based approaches for energy savings in an ambient intelligence environment. Pervasive and Mobile Computing, 19, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hagras, H., Callaghan, V., Colley, M., Clarke, G., Pounds-Cornish, A., & Duman, H. (2004). Creating an ambient-intelligence environment using embedded agents. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 19(6), 12–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Irizarry, J., Gheisari, M., Williams, G., & Roper, K. (2014). Ambient intelligence environments for accessing building information: A healthcare facility management scenario. Facilities, 32(3/4), 120–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bekmezci, I., Sahingoz, O. K., & Temel, S. (2013). Flying ad-hoc networks (FANETs): A survey. Ad Hoc Networks, 11(3), 1254–1270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Temel, S., & Ilker, B. (2014). Scalability analysis of flying ad hoc networks (FANETs): A directional antenna approach. In IEEE international black sea conference on communications and networking (BlackSeaCom).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sharma, V., & Kumar, R. (2014). Service-oriented middleware for multi-UAV guided ad hoc networks. IT Convergence Practice, 2(3).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chiaramonte, R. B., & Branco, K. R. L. J. C. (2014) Collision detection using received signal strength in FANETs. In IEEE international conference on unmanned aircraft systems (ICUAS).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Luo, C., Sally, I. M., Gerard, P., Luke, T., & De Nardi, R. (2013) UAV position estimation and collision avoidance using the extended Kalman filter. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 62(6), 2749–2762.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mohamed, N., Al-Jaroodi, J., Jawhar, I., & Lazarova-Molnar, S. (2014). A service-oriented middleware for building collaborative UAVs. Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, 74(1–2), 309–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Perez, D., Maza, I., Caballero, F., Scarlatti, D., Casado, E., & Ollero, A. (2013). A ground control station for a multi-uav surveillance system. Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, 69(1–4), 119–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cevik, P., Kocaman, I., Akgul, A. S., & Akca, B. (2013). The small and silent force multiplier: A swarm UAVelectronic attack. Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, 70(1–4), 595–608.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Shanmugavel, M., Tsourdos, A., White, B., & bikowski, R. Z. (2010). Co-operative path planning of multiple UAVs using Dubins paths with clothoid arcs. Control Engineering Practice, 18(9), 1084–1092.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sahingoz, & O. K. (2014). Networking models in flying ad-hoc networks (FANETs): Concepts and challenges. Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, 74(1–2), 513–527.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Capitn, J., Merino, L., Caballero, F., & Ollero, A. (2011). Decentralized delayed-state information filter (DDSIF): A new approach for cooperative decentralized tracking. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 59(6), 376–388.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lilien, L., Gupta, A., Kamal, Z.-E.-H., & Yang, Z. (2010). Opportunistic resource utilization networks: A new paradigm for specialized ad hoc networks. Computers & Electrical Engineering, 36(2), 328–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Liu, M., Jie, L., & Yuyu, Y. (2013). Research of UAV cooperative reconnaissance with self-organization path planning. In International conference on computer, networks and communication engineering (ICCNCE 2013). Amsterdam: Atlantis PressGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Li, Y., Chen, H., Joo Er, M., & Wang, X. (2011). Coverage path planning for UAVs based on enhanced exact cellular decomposition method. Mechatronics, 21(5), 876–885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Moon, J., & Prasad, J. V. R. (2011). Minimum-time approach to obstacle avoidance constrained by envelope protection for autonomous UAVs. Mechatronics, 21(5), 861–875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Paw, Y. C., & Gary J. B. (2011). Development and application of an integrated framework for small UAV flight control development. Mechatronics, 21(5), 789–802.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Samar, R., & Rehman, A. (2011). Autonomous terrain-following for unmanned air vehicles. Mechatronics, 21(5), 844–860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Jawhar, I., Mohamed, N., Al-Jaroodi, J., & Zhang, S. (2014). A framework for using unmanned aerial vehicles for data collection in linear wireless sensor networks. Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, 74(1–2), 437–453.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sharma, V., Kumar, R., & Rathore, N. (2015). Topological broadcasting using parameter sensitivity-based logical proximity graphs in coordinated ground-flying ad hoc networks. Journal of Wireless Mobile Networks, Ubiquitous Computing, and Dependable Applications (JoWUA), 6(3), 54–72.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Qingwen, W., Gang, L., Zhi, L. & Qian, Q. (2015). An adaptive forwarding protocol for three dimensional flying ad hoc networks. In 5th international conference on electronics information and emergency communication (ICEIEC), pp. 142–145.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Tareque, M. H., Hossain, M. S., & Atiquzzaman, M. (2015). On the routing in flying ad hoc networks.” In IEEE federated conference on computer science and information systems (FedCSIS), pp. 1–9.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Zaouche, L., Enrico, N., & Bouabdallah, A. (2015). ETTAF: Efficient target tracking and filming with a flying ad hoc network. In Proceedings of the 1st international workshop on experiences with the design and implementation of smart objects, ACM, pp. 49–54.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Sharma, V., & Kumar, R. (2015). An opportunistic cross layer design for efficient service dissemination over flying ad hoc networks (fanets). In 2nd international conference on electronics and communication systems (ICECS), pp. 1551–1557.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Boussad, I., Julien, L., & Patrick, S. (2013). A survey on optimization metaheuristics. Information Sciences, 237, 82–117.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Paliwal, M., & Kumar, U. A. (2009). Neural networks and statistical techniques: A review of applications. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(1), 2–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Elleuch, M., Heni, K., & Mohamed, A. (2015). Exploiting neuro-fuzzy system for mobility prediction in wireless ad-hoc networks. In Advances in computational intelligence (pp. 536–548). New York: SpringerGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Gaxiola, F., Melin, P., Valdez, F., Castro, J. R., & Castillo, O. (2016). Optimization of type-2 fuzzy weights in backpropagation learning for neural networks using GAs and PSO. Applied Soft Computing, 38, 860–871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kumar, L. P. D., Grace, S. S., Krishnan, A., Manikandan, V. M., Chinraj, R., & Sumalatha., M. R.(2012). Data filtering in wireless sensor networks using neural networks for storage in cloud. In International conference on recent trends in information technology (ICRTIT), pp. 202–205.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Ghouti, L., Sheltami, T. R., & Alutaibi, K. S. (2013). Mobility prediction in mobile ad hoc networks using extreme learning machines. Procedia Computer Science, 19, 305–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Islam, Al, Alim, A. B. M., & Raghunathan, V. (2015). iTCP: An intelligent TCP with neural network based end-to-end congestion control for ad-hoc multi-hop wireless mesh networks. Wireless Networks, 21(2), 581–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Trawny, N., & Roumeliotis, S. I. (2005). Indirect Kalman filter for 3D attitude estimation. University of Minnesota, Dept. of Comp. Sci. & Eng. Tech. Rep, 2.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Ludwig, A. & Schmidt, K. D. (2010). GaussMarkov loss prediction in a linear model. In CAS E-Forum Fall, pp. 1–48.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Meinhold, R. J., & Singpurwalla, N. D. (1983). Understanding the Kalman filter. The American Statistician, 37(2), 123–127.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Tenne, D., & Tarunraj, S., (2000). Optimal design of \(\alpha \) - \(\beta \)- \(\gamma \) filters. In IEEE proceedings of the American control conference, Vol. 6, pp. 4348–4352.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Computer Science and Engineering DepartmentThapar UniversityPatialaIndia

Personalised recommendations