Logarithmic laws in service quality perception: where microeconomics meets psychophysics and quality of experience
Utility functions, describing the value of a good or a resource from an end user’s point of view, are widely used as an important ingredient for all sorts of microeconomic models. In the context of resource allocation in communication networks, a logarithmic version of utility usually serves as the standard example due to its simplicity and mathematical tractability. In this paper we argue that indeed there are much more (and better) reasons to consider logarithmic utilities as really paradigmatic, at least when it comes to characterizing user experience with specific telecommunication services. We justify this claim with the help of recent results from Quality of Experience (QoE) research, and demonstrate that, especially for Voice-over-IP and mobile broadband scenarios, there is increasing evidence that user experience and satisfaction follows logarithmic laws. Finally, we go even one step further and put these results into the broader context of the Weber-Fechner Law, a key principle in psychophysics describing the general relationship between the magnitude of a physical stimulus and its perceived intensity within the human sensory system.
KeywordsUtility function Quality-of-experience Proportional fairness Voice over IP Mobile broadband Weber-Fechner law
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.ITU–T Rec. E.800 (2008). Terms and definitions related to quality of service. Google Scholar
- 2.ITU-T Rec. G.100/P.10 (2008). Vocabulary for performance and quality of service, amendment 2: new definitions for inclusion in Recommendation P.10/G.100. Google Scholar
- 3.ITU-T Rec. G.107 (2000). The E-model, a computational model for use in transmission planning. Google Scholar
- 4.ITU-T Rec. P.800 (1996). Methods for subjective determination of transmission quality. Google Scholar
- 5.ITU-T Rec. P.862 (2001). Perceptual evaluation of speech quality (PESQ), an objective method for end-to-end speech quality assessment of narrow-band telephone networks and speech codecs. Google Scholar
- 6.GNU: Speex (2004). http://www.speex.org/.
- 7.Fiedler, M., Chevul, S., Radtke, O., Tutschku, K., & Binzenhöfer, A. (2005). The network utility function: a practicable concept for assessing network impact on distributed services. In Proc. ITC-19, Beijing, China, Sept. 2005 (pp. 1465–1474). Google Scholar
- 8.Fiedler, M., & Hossfeld, T. (2010). Quality of experience-related differential equations and provisioning-delivery hysteresis. In Proc. 21st ITC specialist seminar, Miyazaki, Japan, March 2010. Google Scholar
- 9.Fiedler, M., Kilkki, K., & Reichl, P. From quality of service to quality of experience. Executive Summary, Seminar 09192, Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, available at URL: http://drops.dagstuhl.de/opus/volltexte/2009/2235/pdf/09192.SWM.Paper.2235.pdf.
- 10.Fiedler, M., Hossfeld, T., & Tran-Gia, P. (2010). A generic quantitative relationship between quality of experience and quality of service. IEEE Network, special issue “Improving QoE for Network Services”, pp. 36–41. Google Scholar
- 11.Hayel, Y., Maillé, P., & Tuffin, B. (2005). Modelling and analysis of Internet pricing: introduction and challenges. In Proc. international symposium on applied stochastic models and data analysis (ASMDA), Brest, France, May 2005. Google Scholar
- 12.Hayel, Y., Rubino, G., Tuffin, B., & Varela, M. (2006). A new way of thinking utility in pricing mechanisms: a neural network approach. In Proc. CLAIO’06, Montevideo, Uruguay. Google Scholar
- 13.Hossfeld, T., Tran-Gia, P., & Fiedler, M. (2007). Quantification of quality of experience for edge-based applications. In Proc. 20th international teletraffic congress (ITC20), Ottawa, Canada, June 2007. Google Scholar
- 14.Hossfeld, T., Hock, D., Tran-Gia, P., Tutschku, K., & Fiedler, M. (2008). Testing the IQX hypothesis for exponential interdependency between QoS and QoE of voice codecs iLBC and G.711. In Proc. 18th ITC specialist seminar on quality of experience, Karlskrona, Sweden, May 2008. Google Scholar
- 15.Ibarrola, E., Liberal, F., Taboada, I., & Ortega, R. (2009). Web QoE evaluation in multi-agent networks: validation of ITU-T G.1030. In Proc. ICAS’09, Valencia, Spain, April 2009. Google Scholar
- 17.Kilkki, K. (2008). Quality of experience in communications ecosystems. Journal of Universal Computer Science, Special issue on socio-economic aspects of next generation Internet, Spring. Google Scholar
- 19.Lopez, D., Gonzalez, F., Bellido, L., & Alonso, A. (2006). Adaptive multimedia streaming over IP based on customer oriented metrics. In Intern. symposium on computer networks, Istanbul, June 2006. Google Scholar
- 21.Keeney, R., & Raiffa, H. (1976). Decisions with multiple objectives: preferences and value tradeoffs. New York: Wiley. Google Scholar
- 22.Reichl, P., Thissen, D., & Linnhoff-Popien, C. (1996). How to enhance service selection in distributed systems. In Proc. DCCN’96, Tel Aviv, Israel, Nov. 1996. Google Scholar
- 24.Reichl, P., Egger, S., Schatz, R., & D’Alconzo, A. (2010). The logarithmic nature of QoE and the role of the Weber-Fechner law in QoE assessment. In Proc. IEEE ICC’10, Cape Town, South Africa, May 2010. Google Scholar
- 25.Reichl, P., Fabini, J., Kurtansky, P., & Stiller, B. (2006). A stimulus-response mechanism for charging enhanced quality-of-user experience in next generation all-IP networks. In Proc. CLAIO’06, Montevideo, Uruguay, Nov. 2006. Google Scholar
- 26.Ricciato, F. (2006). Traffic monitoring and analysis for the optimization of a 3G network. IEEE Wireless Communications Magazine, 13(6). Google Scholar
- 27.Robinson, J. (1962). Economic philosophy. Chicago, Aldine. Google Scholar
- 28.Rubino, G., Tirilly, P., & Varela, M. (2006). Evaluating users’ satisfaction in packet networks using random neural networks. In ICANN (vol. 1, pp. 303–312). Google Scholar
- 29.Sun, L., & Ifeachor, E. C. (2002). Perceived speech quality prediction for voice over IP-based networks. In Proc. IEEE ICC’02, New York, USA, April/May 2002. Google Scholar
- 32.Tuffin, B. (2003). Charging the Internet without bandwidth reservation: an overview and bibliography of mathematical approaches. Journal of Information Science and Engineering, 19(5), 765–786. Google Scholar
- 33.Varela, M. (2005). Évaluation pseudo–subjective de la qualité d’un flux multimédia. PhD Thesis, University of Rennes 1, France. Google Scholar
- 34.Varela, M., Marsh, I., & Grönvall, B. (2006). A systematic study of PESQ’s behavior (from a networking perspective). In Proc. MESAQIN’06, Prague, Czech Republic, June 2006. Google Scholar
- 35.Weber, E. H. (1834). De pulsu, resorptione, auditu et tactu. Annotationes anatomicae et physiologicae. Leipzig: Koehler. Google Scholar