Theoretical and Mathematical Physics

, Volume 171, Issue 1, pp 531–540 | Cite as

Spectral dependence of the localization degree in the one-dimensional disordered Lloyd model

Article

Abstract

We calculate the Anderson criterion and the spectral dependence of the degree of localization in the first nonvanishing approximation with respect to disorder for one-dimensional diagonally disordered models with a site energy distribution function that has no finite even moments higher than the zeroth. For this class of models (for which the usual perturbation theory is inapplicable), we show that the perturbation theory can be consistently constructed for the joint statistics of advanced and retarded Green’s functions. Calculations for the Lloyd model show that the Anderson criterion in this case is a linear (not quadratic as usual) function of the disorder degree. We illustrate the calculations with computer experiments.

Keywords

Anderson localization one-dimensional disordered system Green’s function 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    E. E. Jelley, Nature, 38, 1009–1010 (1936).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    G. Scheibe, Angew. Chem., 50, No. 11, 212–219 (1937).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    I. M. Lifshits, S. A. Gredeskul, and L. A. Pastur, Introduction to the Theory of Disordered Systems [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1982).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    A. Rodríguez, V. A. Malyshev, G. Sierra, M. A. Martín-Delgado, J. Rodríguez-Laguna, and F. Domínguez-Adame, Phys. Rev. Lett., 90, 027404 (2003).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    V. A. Malyshev, A. Rodrígues, and F. Domíngues-Adame, Phys. Rev. B, 60, 14140–14146 (1999); arXiv:condmat/9908438v1 (1999).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    M. Titov and H. Schomerus, Phys. Rev. Lett., 91, 176601 (2003); arXiv:cond-mat/0302580v1 (2003).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    P. Lloyd, J. Phys. C, 2, 1717–1725 (1969).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    D. J. Thouless, J. Phys. C, 16, L929 (1983).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    A. MacKinnon, J. Phys. C, 17, L289–L292 (1984).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    D. E. Rodrigues, H. M. Pastawski, and J. F. Weisz, Phys. Rev. B, 34, 8545–8549 (1986).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    S. Fishman, R. E. Prange, and M. Griniasty, Phys. Rev. A, 39, 1628–1633 (1989).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    L. I. Deych, A. A. Lisyansky, and B. L. Altshuler, Phys. Rev. Lett., 84, 2678–2681 (2000).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    G. G. Kozlov, Theor. Math. Phys., 162, 238–253 (2010).MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    P. W. Anderson, Phys. Rev., 109, 1492–1505 (1958).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    G. G. Kozlov, “Spectrum and eigen functions of the operator H U f(x) ≡ f(U − 1/x)/x 2 and strange attractor’s density for the mapping x n+1 = 1/(Ux n),” arXiv:0803.1920v1 [math-ph] (2008).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Fock Institute of PhysicsSt. Petersburg State UniversitySt. PetersburgRussia

Personalised recommendations