Theoretical and Mathematical Physics

, Volume 157, Issue 1, pp 1433–1447 | Cite as

Quantum teleportation

Article
First Online:
Received:

Abstract

In the framework of an algebraic approach, we consider a quantum teleportation procedure. It turns out that using the quantum measurement nonlocality hypothesis is unnecessary for describing this procedure. We study the question of what material objects are information carriers for quantum teleportation.

Keywords

entangled state teleportation of a quantum state teleportation of entanglement 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    D. Bouwmeester, A. Ekert, and A. Zeilinger, eds., The Physics of Quantum Information: Quantum Cryptography, Quantum Teleportation, Quantum Computation, Springer, Berlin (2000).MATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    D. A. Slavnov, Phys. Part. Nucl., 38, 147–176 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    D. A. Slavnov, Theor. Math. Phys., 149, 1690–1701 (2006).CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    J. Dixmier, Les C*-algébres et leurs représentations, Gauthier-Villars, Paris (1969).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    S. Kochen and E. P. Specker, J. Math. Mech., 17, 59–87 (1967).MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    D. M. Greenberger, M. A. Horne, A. Shimony, and A. Zeilinger, Amer. J. Phys., 58, 1131–1143 (1990).CrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    A. N. Kolmogorov, Fundamental Concepts of the Theory of Probability [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1974); English transl. prev. ed.: Foundations of the Theory of Probability, Chelsea, New York (1956).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    J. Neveu, Mathematical Foundations of the Calculus of Probability, Holden-Day, San Francisco, Calif. (1965).MATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    J. S. Bell, Physics, 1, 195–200 (1964).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    J. S. Bell, “On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox,” in: Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics: Collected Papers on Quantum Philosophy, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge (1993), p. 139.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    J. F. Clauser et al., Phys. Rev. Lett., 23, 880–884 (1969).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    G. G. Emch, Algebraic Methods in Statistical Mechanics and Quantum Field Theory (Interscience Monogr. Texts in Phys. and Astr., Vol. 26), Wiley, New York (1972).MATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, and N. Rosen, Phys. Rev. Ser. 2, 47, 777–780 (1935).MATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    D. Bohm, Quantum Theory, Constable, London (1952).MATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    D. Bouwmeester, A. Ekert, and A. Zeilinger, “Quantum dense coding and quantum teleportation,” in: The Physics of Quantum Information: Quantum Cryptography, Quantum Teleportation, Quantum Computation (D. Bouwmeester, A. Ekert, and A. Zeilinger, eds.), Springer, Berlin (2000), pp. 49–92.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    D. Bouwmeester, J.-W. Pan, H. Weinfurter, and A. Zeilinger, “Experiments leading towards quantum computation,” in: The Physics of Quantum Information: Quantum Cryptography, Quantum Teleportation, Quantum Computation (D. Bouwmeester, A. Ekert, and A. Zeilinger, eds.), Springer, Berlin (2000), pp. 133–189.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    T. Jennewein et al., Phys. Rev. Lett., 88, 017903 (2001).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    D. Bouwmeester, J.-W. Pan, H. Weinfurter, and A. Zeilinger, “Quantum networks and multi-particle entanglement,” in: The Physics of Quantum Information: Quantum Cryptography, Quantum Teleportation, Quantum Computation (D. Bouwmeester, A. Ekert, and A. Zeilinger, eds.), Springer, Berlin (2000), pp. 191–220.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© MAIK/Nauka 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Lomonosov Moscow State UniversityMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations