Advertisement

Theoretical and Mathematical Physics

, Volume 152, Issue 2, pp 1060–1068 | Cite as

AdS/CFT duality at strong coupling

  • M. Beccaria
  • C. OrtixEmail author
Article
  • 48 Downloads

Abstract

We study the strong-coupling limit of the AdS/CFT correspondence in the framework of a recently proposed fermionic formulation of the Bethe ansatz equations governing the gauge theory anomalous dimensions. We give examples of states that do not follow the Gubser-Klebanov-Polyakov law at a large ’t Hooft coupling λ, in contrast to recent results on the quantum string Bethe equations that are valid in that regime. This result indicates that the fermionic construction cannot be trusted at large λ, although it remains an efficient tool for computing the weak-coupling expansion of anomalous dimensions.

Keywords

integrable lattice model AdS/CFT correspondence Bethe ansatz 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    E. Witten, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys., 2, 253 (1998); arXiv:hep-th/9802150v2 (1998).zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    V. A. Kazakov, A. Marshakov, J. A. Minahan, and K. Zarembo, JHEP, 0405, 024 (2004); arXiv: hepth/0402207v6 (2004).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    I. R. Klebanov, “TASI lectures: Introduction to the AdS/CFT correspondence,” in: Strings, Branes, and Gravity (TASI’99, Boulder, CO, USA, June, 1999, J. A. Harvey, S. Kachru, and E. Silverstein, eds.), World Scientific, River Edge, N. J. (2001), p. 615; arXiv:hep-th/0009139v2 (2000).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    J. M. Maldacena, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys., 2, 231 (1998); Internat. J. Theoret. Phys., 38, 1113 (1999); arXiv:hep-th/9711200v3 (1997).zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    S. S. Gubser, I. R. Klebanov, and A. M. Polyakov, Phys. Lett. B, 428, 105 (1998); arXiv: hep-th/9802109v2 (1998).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    K. Zarembo, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, Phys., 5, 1081 (2004); Fortschr. Phys., 53, 647 (2005); arXiv:hepth/0411191v2 (2004).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    N. Beisert, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, Phys., 5, 1039 (2004); arXiv:hep-th/0409147v2 (2004).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    N. Beisert, Phys. Rep., 405, 1 (2005); arXiv:hep-th/0407277v4 (2004).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    N. Beisert, V. Dippel, and M. Staudacher, JHEP, 0407, 075 (2004); arXiv:hep-th/0405001v3 (2004).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    K. Zarembo, Phys. Lett. B, 634, 552 (2006); arXiv:hep-th/0512079v1 (2005).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    N. Beisert, J. A. Minahan, M. Staudacher, and K. Zarembo, JHEP, 0309, 010 (2003); arXiv: hep-th/0306139v2 (2003).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    A. Rej, D. Serban, and M. Staudacher, JHEP, 0603, 018 (2006); arXiv:hep-th/0512077v2 (2005).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    S. Frolov and A. A. Tseytlin, Phys. Lett. B, 570, 96 (2003); arXiv:hep-th/0306143v2 (2003).zbMATHCrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    R. Roiban, A. Tirziu, and A. A. Tseytlin, Phys. Rev. D, 73, 066003 (2006); arXiv: hep-th/0601074v2 (2006).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    M. Beccaria and L. Del Debbio, JHEP, 0609, 025 (2006); arXiv:hep-th/0607236v1 (2006).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    G. Arutyunov, S. Frolov, and M. Staudacher, JHEP, 0410, 016 (2004); arXiv:hep-th/0406256v3 (2004).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    M. Beccaria and C. Ortix, JHEP, 0609, 016 (2006); arXiv:hep-th/0606138v1 (2006).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    J. A. Minahan, J. Phys. A, 39, 13083 (2006); arXiv:hep-th/0603175v4 (2006).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    E. A. Yuzbashyan, B. L. Altshuler, and B. S. Shastry, J. Phys. A, 35, 7525 (2002); arXiv: cond-mat/0201551v1 [cond-mat.str-el] (2002).zbMATHCrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    E. H. Lieb and F. Y. Wu, Phys. Rev. Lett., 20, 1445 (1968); Erratum, 21, 192 (1968).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    L. Hulthén, Ark. Mat. Astron. Fysik. A, 26, 1 (1938).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    G. Feverati, D. Fioravanti, P. Grinza, and M. Rossi, JHEP, 0605, 068 (2006); arXiv: hep-th/0602189v2 (2006).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    W. Metzner and D. Vollhardt, Phys. Rev. B, 39, 4462 (1989).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    A. Dhar and B. Shastry, Phys. Rev. Lett., 85, 2813 (2000).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    B. Sutherland, Phys. Rev. Lett., 74, 816 (1995).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    S. Frolov and A. A. Tseytlin, Nucl. Phys. B, 668, 77 (2003); arXiv:hep-th/0304255v3 (2003).zbMATHCrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    J. Plefka, “Spinning strings and integrable spin chains in the AdS/CFT correspondence,” arXiv: hepth/0507136v2 (2005).Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    D. Serban and M. Staudacher, JHEP, 0406, 001 (2004); arXiv:hep-th/0401057v3 (2004).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dipartimento di FisicaUniversitá di Lecce, INFNLecceItaly

Personalised recommendations