Systematic Parasitology

, Volume 72, Issue 3, pp 217–227 | Cite as

Two new species of Anthobothrium van Beneden, 1850 (Tetraphyllidea: Phyllobothriidae) from carcharhinid sharks, with a redescription of Anthobothrium laciniatum Linton, 1890

Article

Abstract

Anthobothrium laciniatum Linton, 1890 is redescribed based on specimens taken from the dusky shark Carcharhinus obscurus (Lesueur) collected from the Northwestern Atlantic Ocean, and a neotype is designated. A. laciniatum differs from A. cornucopia van Beneden, 1850, A. altavelae Euzet & Ben Hassine, 2002, A. lesteri Williams, Burt & Caira, 2004 and A. spinosum Subhapradha, 1955 in total length. It further differs from A. cornucopia, A. altavelae and A. spinosum in proglottid number, and differs from A. galeorhini Suriano, 2002, A. cornucopia, and A. spinosum in testis number. A. lyndoni n. sp. is described from the sandbar shark C. plumbeus (Nardo). This new species differs from A. laciniatum in ovarian width and from A. cornucopia, A. altavelae, A. galeorhini and A. spinosum in the total number of proglottids. It further differs from A. cornucopia, A. galeorhini, and A. spinosum in total length, and from A. cornucopia and A. galeorhini in the number of testes. A. lyndoni n. sp. differs from A. lesteri in bothridial muscle and ovarian morphology. Anthobothrium caseyi n. sp. is described from Prionace glauca (Linnaeus). This new species differs conspicuously from the other six species of Anthobothrium van Beneden, 1850 (sensu stricto) in the shape of its proglottid laciniations. The taxonomic status of 43 species that have been associated with Anthobothrium is addressed. Taxonomic actions regarding Anthobothrium during the past century have resulted in a polyphyletic taxon.

References

  1. Caira, J. N., Jensen, K., & Healy, C. J. (1999). On the phylogenetic relationships among the tetraphyllidean, lecanicephalidean and diphyllidean tapeworm genera. Systematic Parasitology, 42, 77–151.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Caira, J. N., Jensen, K., & Healy, C. J. (2001). Interrelationships among tetraphyllidean and lecanicephalidean cestodes. In D. T. J. Littlewood & R. Bray (Eds.), Interrelationships of the Platyhelminthes (pp. 135–158). London: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  3. Curran, S. S., & Caira, J. N. (1995). Attachment site specificity and the tapeworm assemblage in the spiral intestine of the blue shark (Prionace glauca). Journal of Parasitology, 81, 49–57.Google Scholar
  4. Euzet, L. (1959). Recherches sur les cestodes tétraphyllides des sélaciens des côtes de France. Thése de PhD. Faculté des Sciences, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France, 263 pp.Google Scholar
  5. Euzet, L. (1994). Order Tetraphyllidea Carus, 1863. In L. F. Khalil, A. Jones & R. A. Bray (Eds.), Keys to the cestode parasites of vertebrates (pp. 161–204). Wallingford: CAB International.Google Scholar
  6. Faliex, E., Tyler, G., & Euzet, L. (2000). A new species of Ditrachybothridium (Cestoda: Diphyllidea) from Galeus sp. (Selachii, Scyliorhynidae) from the south Pacific Ocean, with a revision of the diagnosis of the order, family, and genus and notes on descriptive terminology of microtriches. Journal of Parasitology, 86, 1078–1084.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Henderson, A. C., Flannery, K., & Dunne, J. (2002). Parasites of the blue shark (Prionace glauca L.), in the North-East Atlantic Ocean. Journal of Natural History, 36, 1995–2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Linton, E. (1890). Notes on Entozoa of marine fishes of New England, with descriptions of several new species. Part II. Report of the United States Commissioner of Fisheries (1887), Washington D.C., 15, 718–899.Google Scholar
  9. Neifar, L., Euzet, L., & Ben Hassine, O. K. (2002). Anthobothrium altavelae sp. n. (Cestoda: Tetraphyllidea) from the spiny butterfly ray Gymnura altavela (Elasmobranchii: Gymnuridae) in Tunisia. Folia Parasitologica, 49, 295–298.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Olson, P. D., & Caira, J. N. (1999). Evolution of the major lineages of tapeworms (Platyhelminthes: Cestoidea) inferred from 18S ribosomal DNA and elongation factor-1alpha. Journal of Parasitology, 85, 1134–1159.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Riser, N. W. (1955). Studies on cestode parasites of sharks and skates. Journal of the Tennessee Academy of Science, 30, 265–311.Google Scholar
  12. Suriano, D. M. (2002). Anthobothrium galeorhini n. sp. (Eucestoda: Tetraphyllidea) a parasite of Galeorhinus galeus (Triakidae) from the Argentine coast. Parasite, 9, 121–125.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Stossich, M. (1895). Notizie Elmintologiche. Bolletino della Societa Adriatica di Scienze Naturali Trieste, 16, 33–46.Google Scholar
  14. van Beneden, P. J. (1850). Recherches sur la faune littorale de Belgique. Les vers cestoides, considérés sous le rapport physiologique, embryogénique et zooclassique. Mémoires de l’Academie Royale des Sciences, des Lettres et des Beaux-Arts de Belgique 25, 1–199, 201–204 (Supplement).Google Scholar
  15. Williams, H. H., Burt, M. D. B., & Caira, J. N. (2004). Anthobothrium lesteri n. sp. (Cestoda: Tetraphyllidea) in Carcharhinus melanopterus from Heron Island, Australia, with comments on its site, mode of attachment, reproductive strategy and membership of the genus. Systematic Parasitology, 59, 211–221.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Yamaguti, S. (1952). Studies on the helminth fauna of Japan. Part 49. Cestodes of fishes, II. Acta Medicinae Okayama, 8, 1–76.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of BiologyWest Virginia State UniversityInstituteUSA
  2. 2.Department of Ecology and Evolutionary BiologyThe University of ConnecticutStorrsUSA

Personalised recommendations