Advertisement

Synthese

pp 1–30 | Cite as

Joint actions, commitments and the need to belong

  • Víctor Fernández CastroEmail author
  • Elisabeth Pacherie
Article

Abstract

This paper concerns the credibility problem for commitments. Commitments play an important role in cooperative human interactions and can dramatically improve the performance of joint actions by stabilizing expectations, reducing the uncertainty of the interaction, providing reasons to cooperate or improving action coordination. However, commitments can only serve these functions if they are credible in the first place. What is it then that insures the credibility of commitments? To answer this question, we need to provide an account of what motivates us to abide by our commitments. We first discuss two conceptions of the nature of the commitments present in joint action and of the norms that govern them. We contend that while normative considerations may have some motivational force, there are reasons to doubt that they, by themselves, could provide a sufficient motivational basis to fully explain why agents abide by their commitments and thus why their commitments are credible. In the next two sections, we discuss two proposals regarding further sources of motivation, reputation management and social emotions. We argue that while reputation management and social emotions certainly play a role in motivating us to act as committed, there are both theoretical and empirical reasons to think that neither captures the most basic motivational force at work in sustaining commitments. We propose instead that the need to belong, i.e., the need to affiliate with others and form long-lasting bonds with them, is what primarily motivates us to interact and engage with those around us and act so as to preserve and reinforce the bonds we have forged with them. We argue that the need to belong is a more basic proximate motivation for conforming to commitments, in the sense both that affiliative behaviors are evidenced much earlier in human development than either reputation management or social emotions and that the need to belong is at least part of an explanation of why we care for our reputation and why we care about others’ assessments of our behavior.

Keywords

Joint action Commitment Credibility Practical rationality Social normativity Reputation Social emotions Need to belong 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank John Michael and two anonymous referees for their valuable comments and suggestions on earlier drafts of this paper. We would also like to thank the participants to the workshop “Layers of Collective Intentionality” held in Vienna in August 2018, the participants to the workshop “Human–Robot Joint Action: Refining the understanding of joint action through an interdisciplinary perspective” held in Paris in September 2018 and the members of the Philosophy Department at the University of Granada. This research was supported by the Agence Nationale de la Recherche [Grant Number ANR-16-CE33-0017] and by the EUR Frontiers in Cognition [Grant Number ANR-17-EURE-0017].

References

  1. Alexander, R. D. (1987). The biology of moral systems. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  2. Andreoni, J., & Croson, R. (2008). Partners versus Strangers: Random rematching in public goods experiments. In C. R. Plott & V. L. Smitt (Eds.), Handbook of experimental economics results (776-783) (Vol. 1). Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
  3. Austin, J. (1962). How to do things with words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Barclay, P., & Willer, R. (2007). Partner choice creates competitive altruism in humans. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences,274, 749–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin,117, 497–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baumeister, R. F., Stillwell, A. M., & Heatherton, T. F. (1994). Guilt: An interpersonal approach. Psychological Bulletin,115, 243–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bicchieri, C. (1997). Learning to Cooperate. In C. Bicchieri, R. C. Jeffrey, & B. Skyrms (Eds.), The dynamics of norms (pp. 17–46). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Bicchieri, C. (2006). The grammar of society: The nature and dynamics of social norms. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Bratman, M. E. (1987). Intention, plans, and practical reason. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Bratman, M. E. (1992). Shared cooperative activity. The Philosophical Review,101(2), 327–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bratman, M. E. (2009). Shared agency. In C. Mantzavinos (Ed.), Philosophy of the social sciences: Philosophical theory and scientific practice (pp. 41–59). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bratman, M. E. (2014). Shared agency: A planning theory of acting together. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brooks, J., & Lewis, M. (1976). Infants’ responses to strangers: Midget, adult, and child. Child Development,47, 323–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brownell, C. A. (2011). Early developments in joint action. Review of Philosophy and Psychology,2(2), 193–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Butterfill, S. A., & Sebanz, N. (2011). Joint action: What is shared? Review of Philosophy and Psychology,2(2), 137–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Carpenter, M. (2009). Just how joint is joint action in infancy? Topics in Cognitive Science,1(2), 380–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chang, L. J., Smith, A., Dufwenberg, M., & Sanfey, A. G. (2011). Triangulating the neural, psychological, and economic bases of guilt aversion. Neuron,70(3), 560–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Chaudhuri, A. (2011). Sustaining cooperation in laboratory public goods experiments: a selective survey of the literature. Experimental Economics,14(1), 47–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cheng, Y., Lee, S. Y., Chen, H. Y., Wang, P., & Decety, J. (2012). Voice and emotion processing in the human neonatal brain. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,24, 1411–1419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Chevallier, C., Kohls, G., Troiani, V., Brodkin, E. S., & Schultz, R. T. (2012). The social motivation theory of autism. Trends in Cognitive Sciences,16(4), 231–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cialdini, R. B., Schaller, M., Houlihan, D., Arps, K., Fultz, J., & Beaman, A. L. (1987). Empathy-based helping: Is it selflessly or selfishly motivated? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,52(4), 749–758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Decety, J., & Cowell, J. M. (2018). Interpersonal harm aversion as a necessary foundation for morality: A developmental neuroscience perspective. Development and Psychopathology, 30(1), 153–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. De Haan, M., Belsky, J., Reid, V., Volein, A., & Johnson, M. H. (2004). Maternal personality and infants’ neural and visual responsivity to facial expressions of emotion. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry,45(7), 1209–1218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. De Hooge, I. E., Zeelenberg, M., & Breugelmans, S. M. (2007). Moral sentiments and cooperation: Differential influences of shame and guilt. Cognition and Emotion,21(5), 1025–1042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dreber, A., Rand, D. G., Fudenberg, D., & Nowak, M. A. (2008). Winners don’t Punish. Nature,452, 348–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Engelmann, J. M., Herrmann, E., & Tomasello, M. (2016). Preschoolers affect others’ reputations through prosocial gossip. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 34(3), 447–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Everett, J. A., Faber, N. S., & Crockett, M. (2015). Preferences and beliefs in ingroup favoritism. Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience,9, 15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Fehr, E., Bernhard, H., & Rockenbach, B. (2008). Egalitarianism in young children. Nature,454(7208), 107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Fehr, E., & Rockenbach, B. (2003). Detrimental effects of sanctions on human altruism. Nature,422, 137–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. FeldmanHall, O., Dalgleish, T., Evans, D., & Mobbs, D. (2015). Empathic concern drives costly altruism. NeuroImage,105, 347–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Frank, R. (1988). Passions within reason. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  32. Gifford-Smith, M., & Brownell, C. (2003). Childhood peer relationships: Social acceptance, friendships & peer networks. Journal of School Psychology,41, 235–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gilbert, M. (1992). On social facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Gilbert, M. (2006). Rationality in collective action. Philosophy of the Social Sciences,36(1), 3–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Gilbert, M. (2009). Shared intention and personal intentions. Philosophical Studies,144, 167–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Godman, M. (2013). Why we do things together: The social motivation for joint action. Philosophical Psychology,26(4), 588–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Godman, M., Nagatsu, M., & Salmela, M. (2014). The social motivation hypothesis for prosocial behavior. Philosophy of the Social Sciences,44(5), 563–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Gräfenhain, M., Behne, T., Carpenter, M., & Tomasello, M. (2009). Young children’s understanding of joint commitments. Developmental Psychology,45, 1430–1443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Haley, K. J., & Fessler, D. M. T. (2005). Nobody’s watching? Subtle cues affect generosity an anonymous economic game. Evolution and Human Behavior,26, 245–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hamlin, J. K. (2015). The infantile origins of our moral brains. In J. Decety & T. Wheatley (Eds.), The moral brain—Multidisciplinary perspectives (pp. 105–122). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  41. Hamlin, J. K., & Wynn, K. (2011). Young infants prefer prosocial to antisocial others. Cognitive Development,26(1), 30–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hamlin, J. K., Wynn, K., & Bloom, P. (2007). Social evaluation by preverbal infants. Nature,450, 557–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hareli, S., & Parkinson, B. (2008). What’s social about social emotions? Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour,38(2), 131–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Harris, P. L., Olthof, T., Terwogt, M. M., & Hardman, C. E. (1987). Children’s knowledge of the situations that provoke emotion. International Journal of Behavioral Development,10(3), 319–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Hay, D. F., Nash, A., & Pedersen, J. (1983). Interaction between six-month-old peers. Child Development,54, 557–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Hay, D. F., Payne, A., & Chadwick, A. (2004). Peer relations in childhood. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry,45(1), 84–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Heintz, C., Karabegovic, M., & Molnar, A. (2016). The co-evolution of honesty and strategic vigilance. Frontiers in Psychology,7, 1503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Howes, C. (1996). The earliest friendships. In W. M. Bukowski, A. F. Newcomb, & W. W. Hartup (Eds.), The company they keep: Friendship in childhood and adolescence (pp. 66–86). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Jacobson, J. L. (1981). The role of inanimate objects in early peer interaction. Child Development,52, 618–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kahneman, D., & Egan, P. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
  51. Ketelaar, T., & Au, W. T. (2003). The effects of feelings of guilt on the behaviour of uncooperative individuals in repeated social bargaining games: An affect-as information interpretation of the role of emotion in social interaction. Cognition and Emotion,17, 429–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Lakin, J. L., & Chartrand, T. L. (2003). Using nonconscious behavioral mimicry to create affiliation and rapport. Psychological Sciences,14, 334–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Leary, J. L., & Allen, A. B. (2011). Belonging motivation: Establishing, maintaining, and repairing relational value. In D. Dunning (Ed.), Social Motivation (pp. 37–56). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  54. Ledyard, J. (1995a). Public goods: A survey of experimental research. In A. Roth & J. Kagel (Eds.), Handbook of Experimental Economics (pp. 111–194). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Ledyard, O. (1995b). Public goods: some experimental results. In J. Kagel & A. Roth (Eds.), Handbook of experimental economics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Leimgruber, K. L., Shaw, A., Santos, L. R., & Olson, K. R. (2012). Young children are more generous when others are aware of their actions. PLoS ONE,7(10), e48292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Lergetporer, P., Angerer, S., Glätzle-Rützler, D., & Suttera, M. (2014). Third-party punishment increases cooperation in children through (misaligned) expectations and conditional cooperation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,111(19), 6916–6921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Lewis, M., Sullivan, M. W., Stanger, C., & Weiss, M. (1989). Self development and self-conscious emotions. Child Development,60, 146–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Lo Presti, P. (2013). Situating norms and jointness of social interaction. Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy,9(1), 225–248.Google Scholar
  60. Marchant, A. (2014). Neonates do not feel pain: A critical review of the evidence. Bioscience Horizon,7, 1–9.Google Scholar
  61. Michael, J. (2011). Shared emotions and joint action. Review of Philosophy and Psychology,2(2), 355–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Michael, J., & Pacherie, E. (2015). On commitments and other uncertainty reduction devices. Journal of Social Ontology,1(1), 89–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Michael, J., & Salice, A. (2016). The sense of commitment in human–robot interaction. International Journal of Social Robotics,9(5), 755–763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Michael, J., Sebanz, N., & Knoblich, G. (2016). The sense of commitment: a minimal approach. Frontiers in Psychology,6, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Michael, J., & Székely, M. (2018). The developmental origins of commitment. Journal of Social Philosophy,49(1), 106–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Mills, R. S. (2005). Taking stock of the developmental literature on shame. Developmental Review,25(1), 26–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Mills, R. S., Arbeau, K. A., Lall, D. I., & De Jaeger, A. E. (2010). Parenting and child characteristics in the prediction of shame in early and middle childhood. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly,46(4), 500–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Moore, G. A. (1903). Principia ethica. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  69. Nelissen, R. M. A., & Zeelenberg, M. (2009). When guilt evokes self-punishment: Evidence for the existence of a Dobby effect. Emotion,9, 118–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Newcomb, A. F., & Bagwell, C. L. (1995). Children’s friendship relations: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin,117, 306–347.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.2.306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Nielsen, M. (2006). Copying actions and copying outcomes: Social learning through the second year. Developmental Psychology,42, 555–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Nielsen, M. (2009). The imitative behavior of children and chimpanzees: A window on the transmission of cultural traditions. Revue de primatologie,1, 254.Google Scholar
  73. Nowak, M. A., & Sigmund, K. (2005). Evolution of indirect reciprocity. Nature,437, 1291–1298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Over, H. (2016). The origins of belonging: Social motivation in infants and young children. Philosophical Transaction of the Royal Society: Biology,371, 20150072.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0072.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Over, H., & Carpenter, M. (2009). Priming third-party ostracism increases affiliative imitation in children. Developmental Sciences,12, F1–F8.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00820.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Pacherie, E. (2011). Framing joint action. Review of Philosophy and Psychology,2(2), 173–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Parisette-Sparks, A., Bufferd, S. J., & Klein, D. N. (2017). Parental predictors of children’s shame and guilt at age 6 in a multimethod, longitudinal study. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology,46(5), 721–731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Piazza, J., Bering, J. M., & Ingram, G. (2011). Princess Alice is watching you: Children’s belief in an invisible person inhibits cheating. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 109(3), 311–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Rakoczy, H. (2006). Pretend play and the development of collective intentionality. Cognitive Systems Research,7, 113–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Rakoczy, H., Warneken, F., & Tomasello, M. (2008). The sources of normativity: Young children’s awareness of the normative structure of games. Developmental Psychology,44(3), 875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Rochat, P., Broesch, T., & Jayne, K. (2012). Social awareness and early self-recognition. Consciousness and Cognition,21(3), 1491–1497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Rochat, P., Querido, J. G., & Striano, T. (1999). Emerging sensitivity to the timing and structure of protoconversation in early infancy. Developmental Psychology,35, 950–957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Roth, A. S. (2004). Shared agency and contralateral commitments. The Philosophical Review,113(3), 359–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Rusch, H., & Luetge, C. (2016). Spillovers from coordination to cooperation: Evidence for the interdependence hypothesis? Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences,10(4), 284–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Sally, D. (1995). Conversation and cooperation in social dilemmas a meta-analysis of experiments from 1958 to 1992. Rationality and Society,7(1), 58–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Salmela, M., & Nagatsu, M. (2016). Collective emotions and joint action. Journal of Social Ontology,2(1), 33–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Scanlon, T. (1998). What we owe to each other. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  88. Schelling, T. C. (1960). The strategy of conflict. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  89. Sebanz, N., Bekkering, H., & Knoblich, G. (2006). Joint action: Bodies and minds moving together. Trends in Cognitive Science,10, 70–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Shaw, A., & Olson, K. (2015). Whose idea is it anyway? The importance of reputation in acknowledgement. Developmental Science,18, 502–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Silver, I. M., & Shaw, A. (2018). Pint-sized public relations: The development of reputation management. Trends in cognitive sciences,22(4), 277–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Siposova, B., Tomasello, M., & Carpenter, M. (2018). Communicative eye contact signals a commitment to cooperate for young children. Cognition,179, 192–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Skinner, A. L., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2019). Childhood experiences and intergroup biases among children. Social Issues and Policy Review,13(1), 211–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Stefani, L. H., & Camaioni, L. (1983). Effects of familiarity on peer interaction in the first year of life. Early Child Development and Care,11, 45–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Strandberg, C. (2004). In defence of the open question argument. The Journal of Ethics,8(2), 179–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Sugden, R. (2000). The motivating power of expectations. In J. Nida-Rümelin & W. Spohn (Eds.), Rationality, rules, and structure (pp. 103–129). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Székely, M., & Michael, J. (2018). Investment in commitment: Persistence in a joint action is enhance by the perception of a partner’s effort. Cognition,174, 37–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Tollefsen, D. (2005). Let’s pretend! Children and joint action. Philosophy of the Social Sciences,35(1), 75–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Tomasello, M. (2009). Why we cooperate. Cambridge: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Tomasello, M., & Carpenter, M. (2007). Shared intentionality. Developmental Sciences,10, 121–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Tomasello, M., & Rakoczy, H. (2003). What makes human cognition unique? From individual to shared to collective intentionality. Mind and Language,18(2), 121–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Trevarthen, C., & Aitken, K. J. (2001). Infant intersubjectivity: Research, theory, and clinical applications. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry,42, 3–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Trivers, R. L. (1971). The evolution of reciprocal altruism. The Quarterly Review of Biology,46(1), 35–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Vaish, A. (2018). The prosocial functions of early social emotions: The case of guilt. Current opinion in psychology,20, 25–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Vaish, A., Carpenter, M., & Tomasello, M. (2016). The early emergence of guilt-motivated prosocial behavior. Child Development,87(6), 1772–1782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Van Vugt, M., Roberts, G., & Hardy, C. (2007). Competitive altruism: Development of reputation-based cooperation in groups. In R. Dunbar & L. Barrett (Eds.), Handbook of evolutionary psychology (pp. 531–540). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  107. Vesper, C., Butterfill, S., Sebanz, N., & Knoblich, G. (2010). A minimal architecture for joint action. Neural Networks,23, 998–1003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Warneken, F., Chen, F., & Tomasello, M. (2006). Cooperative activities in young children and chimpanzees. Child Development,77(3), 640–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Warneken, F., & Tomasello, M. (2007). Helping and cooperation at 14 months of age. Infancy,11, 271–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Warneken, F., & Tomasello, M. (2008). Extrinsic rewards undermine altruistic tendencies in 20-month-olds. Developmental Psychology,44, 1785–1788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Young, G., & Lewis, M. (1979). Effects of familiarity and maternal attention on infant peer relations. Merrill Palmer Quarterly,25, 105–119.Google Scholar
  112. Zahavi, A., & Zahavi, A. (1997). The handicap principle: A missing piece of Darwin’s puzzle. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  113. Zahn-Waxler, C., Radke-Yarrow, M., & Wagner, E. (1992). Development of concern for others. Developmental Psychology,28, 126–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institut Jean Nicod, CNRS UMR 8129, Département d’Etudes Cognitives, École Normale SupérieurePSL Research UniversityParisFrance
  2. 2.LAAS-CNRSUniversité de Toulouse, CNRSToulouseFrance

Personalised recommendations