Advertisement

Synthese

pp 1–27 | Cite as

Heritability, causal influence and locality

  • Pierrick BourratEmail author
Article
  • 29 Downloads

Abstract

Heritability is routinely interpreted causally. Yet, what such an interpretation amounts to is often unclear. Here, I provide a causal interpretation of this concept in terms of range of causal influence, one of several causal dimensions proposed within the interventionist account of causation. An information-theoretic measure of range of causal influence has recently been put forward in the literature. Starting from this formalization and relying upon Woodward’s analysis, I show that an important problem associated with interpreting heritability causally, namely the locality problem, amounts, at least partly, to a low invariance and low stability between the genotype/environment and the phenotype of individuals. In light of this, I plead for a causal interpretation of heritability that takes the notions of Woodward’s invariance and stability into consideration. In doing so, I defuse naive causal interpretations of heritability.

Keywords

Heritability Causality Causal specificity Causal influence Locality Invariance Stability 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I am thankful to the Theory and Method in Biosciences group at the University of Sydney for feedback on a previous version of the manuscript. I thank in particular Arnaud Pocheville for discussion and insightful comments, and Stefan Gawronski who proofread the final manuscript. This research was supported by a Macquarie University Research Fellowship and a Large Grant from the John Templeton Foundation (Grant ID 60811).

References

  1. Alicke, M. D. (1992). Culpable causation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(3), 368–378.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.63.3.368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Begg, C. B., Orlow, I., Hummer, A. J., Armstrong, B. K., Kricker, A., Marrett, L. D., et al. (2005). Lifetime risk of melanoma in CDKN2A mutation carriers in a population-based sample. JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 97(20), 1507–1515.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/dji312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bell, A. E. (1977). Heritability in retrospect. Journal of Heredity, 68(5), 297–300.  https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a108840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bourrat, P. (2015). How to read ‘heritability’ in the recipe approach to natural selection. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 66(4), 883–903.  https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axu015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bourrat, P. (2019). Evolution is About Populations, But Its Causes are About Individuals. Biological Theory, 14(4), 254–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bourrat, P. (2019a). On Calcott’s permissive and instructive cause distinction. Biology & Philosophy, 34(1), 1.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-018-9654-y. 00001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bourrat, P. (2019b). Variation of information as a measure of one-to-one causal specificity. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 9(1), 11.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-018-0224-6. 00001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bourrat, P. (accepted) Causation and SNP Heritability’. Philosophy of Science.Google Scholar
  9. Bourrat, P., & Lu, Q. (2017). Dissolving the missing heritability problem. Philosophy of Science, 84(5), 1055–1067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Caspi, A., McClay, J., Moffitt, T. E., Mill, J., Martin, J., Craig, I. W., et al. (2002). Role of genotype in the cycle of violence in maltreated children. Science, 297(5582), 851–854.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1072290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Downes. S. M. (2009). Heritability. Stanford Encyclopeadia of Philosophy.Google Scholar
  12. Falconer, D. S., & Mackay, T. F. (1996). Introduction to quantitative genetics (4th ed.). Essex: Longman.Google Scholar
  13. Fisher, R. A. (1918). The correlation between relatives on the supposition of Mendelian inheritance. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 52(02), 399–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gandini, S., Sera, F., Cattaruzza, M. S., Pasquini, P., Picconi, O., Boyle, P., et al. (2005a). Meta-analysis of risk factors for cutaneous melanoma: II. Sun exposure. European Journal of Cancer, 41(1), 45–60.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2004.10.016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gandini, S., Sera, F., Cattaruzza, M. S., Pasquini, P., Zanetti, R., Masini, C., et al. (2005b). Meta-analysis of risk factors for cutaneous melanoma: III. Family history, actinic damage and phenotypic factors. European Journal of Cancer, 41(14), 2040–2059.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2005.03.034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Garner, W. R., & McGill, W. J. (1956). The relation between information and variance analyses. Psychometrika, 21(3), 219–228.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Godfrey-Smith, P. (2009). Darwinian populations and natural selection. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Griffiths, P. E., & Neumann-Held, E. M. (1999). The many faces of the gene. Bioscience, 49, 656–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Griffiths, P. E., Pocheville, A., Calcott, B., Stotz, K., Kim, H., & Knight, R. (2015). Measuring causal specificity. Philosophy of Science, 82(4), 529–555.  https://doi.org/10.1086/682914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Griffiths, P. E., & Stotz, K. (2013). Genetics and philosophy: An introduction. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hayward, N. K. (2003). Genetics of melanoma predisposition. Oncogene, 22(20), 3053–3062.  https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1206445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jacquard, A. (1983). Heritability: One word, three concepts. Biometrics, 39, 465–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Korb, K. B., Nyberg, E. P., & Hope, L. (2011). A new causal power theory. In F. Russo, J. Williamson, & P. M. Illari (Eds.), Causality in the sciences (pp. 628–652). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lewis, D. (2000). Causation as influence. The Journal of Philosophy, 97(4), 182–197.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2678389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lewontin, R. C. (1974). Annotation: The analysis of variance and the analysis of causes. American Journal of Human Genetics, 26(3), 400–411.Google Scholar
  26. Lu, Q., & Bourrat, P. (2018). The evolutionary gene and the extended evolutionary synthesis. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 69(3), 775–800.  https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axw035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lynch, K. E. (2017). Heritability and causal reasoning. Biology & Philosophy, 32(1), 25–49.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-016-9535-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lynch, K. E., & Bourrat, P. (2017). Interpreting heritability causally. Philosophy of Science, 84(1), 14–34.  https://doi.org/10.1086/688933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lynch, M., & Walsh, B. (1998). Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits (Vol. 1). Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.Google Scholar
  30. Moffitt, T. E., Caspi, A., & Rutter, M. (2005). Strategy for investigating interactions between measured genes and measured environments. Archives of General Psychiatry, 62(5), 473–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Northcott, R. (2006). Causal efficacy and the analysis of variance. Biology and Philosophy, 21(2), 253–276.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-005-8304-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Northcott, R. (2008). Can ANOVA measure causal strength? The Quarterly Review of Biology, 83(1), 47–55.  https://doi.org/10.1086/529562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Oftedal, G. (2005). Heritability and genetic causation. Philosophy of Science, 72(5), 699–709.  https://doi.org/10.1086/508126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. OSC (Open Science Collaboration). (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science349(6251):aac4716.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716.
  35. Pearl, J. (2009). Causality: Models, reasoning, and inference (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pocheville, A., Griffiths, P. E., & Stotz, K. (2017). Comparing causes—an information-theoretic approach to specificity, proportionality and stability. In H. Leitgeb., I. Niiniluoto., E. Sober., & P. Seppälä (Eds.), Proceedings of the 15th congress of logic, methodology and philosophy of science. London: College Publications.Google Scholar
  37. Polderman, T. J. C., Benyamin, B., de Leeuw, C. A., Sullivan, P. F., van Bochoven, A., Visscher, P. M., et al. (2015). Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies. Nature Genetics, 47(7), 702–709.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.3285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sarkar, S. (1998). Genetics and reductionism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sesardic, N. (2005). Making sense of heritability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sterelny, K., & Griffiths, P. E. (1999). Sex and death: An introduction to philosophy of biology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Stevens, S. S. (1946). On the theory of scales of measurement. Science, 103(2684), 677–680.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.103.2684.677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Stewart, B. W. K. P., & Wild, C. P. (2014). World cancer report 2014. Geneva: WHO.Google Scholar
  43. Stone, J. V. (2015). Information theory: A tutorial introduction. Sheffield: Sebtel Press.Google Scholar
  44. Tabery, J. (2014). Beyond versus: The struggle to define the interaction of nature and nurture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Tal, O. (2009). From heritability to probability. Biology & Philosophy, 24(1), 81–105.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-008-9129-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Tal, O. (2012). The impact of gene-environment interaction and correlation on the interpretation of heritability. Acta Biotheoretica, 60(3), 225–237.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10441-011-9139-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Taylor, P. (2006). Commentary: The analysis of variance is an analysis of causes (of a very circumscribed kind). International Journal of Epidemiology, 35, 527–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Taylor, P. (2009). Perspectives from plant breeding on Tal’s argument about the weight of genetic versus environmental causes for individuals. Biology & Philosophy, 24(5), 735–738.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-009-9162-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Taylor, P. (2010). Three puzzles and eight gaps: What heritability studies and critical commentaries have not paid enough attention to. Biology & Philosophy, 25(1), 1–31.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-009-9174-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Taylor, P. J. (2012). A gene-free formulation of classical quantitative genetics used to examine results and interpretations under three standard assumptions. Acta Biotheoretica, 60(4), 357–378.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10441-012-9164-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Turkheimer, E. (1998). Heritability and biological explanation. Psychological Review, 105(4), 782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Turkheimer, E. (2000). Three laws of behavior genetics and what they mean. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9(5), 160–164.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00084.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Visscher, P. M., & Goddard, M. E. (2019). From R.A. Fisher’s 1918 paper to GWAS a century later. Genetics, 211(4), 1125–1130.  https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.118.301594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Visscher, P. M., Hill, W. G., & Wray, N. R. (2008). Heritability in the genomics era—concepts and misconceptions. Nature Reviews Genetics, 9(4), 255–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Waters, C. K. (2007). Causes that make a difference. The Journal of Philosophy, 104, 551–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Weber, M. (2006). The central dogma as a thesis of causal specificity. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 28, 595–609.Google Scholar
  57. Woodward, J. (2000). Explanation and invariance in the special sciences. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 51(2), 197–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Woodward, J. (2003). Making things happen: A theory of causal explanation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  59. Woodward, J. (2010). Causation in biology: Stability, specificity, and the choice of levels of explanation. Biology & Philosophy, 25(3), 287–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Woodward, J. (2013). Causation and manipulability. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Moscow: Winter.Google Scholar
  61. Woodward, J., & Hitchcock, C. (2003). Explanatory generalizations, part I: A counterfactual account. Noûs, 37(1), 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. World Health Organization. (2002). Global solar UV index: A practical guide. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, oCLC: 51304373.Google Scholar
  63. Wright, S. (1920). The relative importance of heredity and environment in determining the piebald pattern of guinea-pigs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 6(6), 320–332.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.6.6.320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Yablo, S. (1992). Mental causation. The Philosophical Review, 101(2), 245–280.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2185535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Yang, J., Benyamin, B., McEvoy, B. P., Gordon, S., Henders, A. K., Nyholt, D. R., et al. (2010). Common SNPs explain a large proportion of the heritability for human height. Nature genetics, 42(7), 565–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyMacquarie UniversityNorth RydeAustralia
  2. 2.Department of Philosophy and Charles Perkins CentreThe University of SydneyCamperdownAustralia

Personalised recommendations