Advertisement

Synthese

pp 1–13 | Cite as

In what sense is understanding an intellectual virtue?

  • Xingming HuEmail author
Article
  • 76 Downloads

Abstract

In this paper, I distinguish between two senses of “understanding”: understanding as an epistemic good and understanding as a character trait or a distinctive power of the mind. I argue that understanding as a character trait or a distinctive power of the mind is an intellectual virtue while understanding as an epistemic good is not. Finally, I show how the distinction can help us better appreciate Aristotle’s account of intellectual virtue.

Keywords

Understanding Grasp Intellectual virtue Epistemic value 

Notes

Acknowledgements

For comments on earlier drafts or conversations on related topics, I would like to thank Shuyi Feng, Stephen Grimm, Siyi Hu, Xuya Ma, Yue Wang, Ru Ye, and two anonymous reviewers. My work on this paper was supported by two programs of the National Social Science Fund of China: the Young Scholars Program [16CZX046] and the Major Program [18ZDA031].

References

  1. Ahlstrom-Vij, K., & Grimm, S. R. (2013). Getting it right. Philosophical Studies, 166(2), 329–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baehr, J. (2011). The structure of open-mindedness. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 41(2), 191–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baehr, J. (2017). Intellectual virtues and truth, understanding, and wisdom. In N. E. Snow (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of virtue. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Battaly, H. (2008). Virtue epistemology. Philosophy Compass, 3(4), 639–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Burnyeat, M. (1981). Aristotle on understanding knowledge. In E. Berti (Ed.), Aristotle on science: The Posterior analytics. Editrice Antenoire: Padua.Google Scholar
  6. Carter, J. A., & Gordon, E. C. (2014). Openmindedness and truth. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 44(2), 207–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Collingwood, R. G. (1946/1994). The idea of history. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Elgin, C. (2007). Understanding and the facts. Philosophical Studies, 132(1), 33–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Elgin, C. (2017). Understanding. In E. Craig (Ed.), The Routledge encyclopedia of philosophy. New York: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  10. Goldman, A. (2001). The unity of the epistemic virtues. In A. Fairweather & L. Zagzebski (Eds.), Virtue epistemology: Essays on epistemic value and responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Goldman, A. (2006). Simulating minds: The philosophy, psychology, and neuroscience of mindreading. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gordon, R. (2000). Simulation and the explanation of action. In H. Kogler & K. Stueber (Eds.), Empathy and agency: The problem of understanding in the human sciences. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  13. Greco, J. (2002). Virtues in epistemology. In P. K. Moser (Ed.), Oxford handbook of epistemology. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Greco, J. (2003). Virtue and luck, epistemic and otherwise. Metaphilosophy, 34(3), 353–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Grimm, S. R. (2006). Is understanding a species of knowledge? The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 57(3), 515–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Grimm, S. R. (2011). Understanding. In D. Pritchard & S. Berneker (Eds.), The Routledge companion to epistemology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Grimm, S. R. (2016a). How understanding people differs from understanding the natural world. Philosophical Issues, 26(1), 209–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Grimm, S. R. (2016b). Understanding and transparency. In R. Stephen, C. Baumberger, & S. Ammon (Eds.), Explaining Understanding: New Perspectives From Epistemology and Philosophy of Science. Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Grimm, S. (2019). Understanding as an intellectual virtue. In H. Battaly (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of virtue epistemology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Grimm, S. (forthcoming). Transmitting understanding and know-how. In S. Hetherington (Ed.), What the ancients offer to contemporary epistemology. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Hills, A. (2015). Understanding why. Noûs, 49(2), 661–688.Google Scholar
  22. Hu, X. (2019a). Two kinds of understanding (Liang Zhong Li Jie). Journal of Dialectics of Nature, 41(5), 26–32.Google Scholar
  23. Hu, X. (2019b). Is knowledge of causes sufficient for understanding? Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 49(3), 291–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hughes, G. J. (2013). The Routledge guidebook to Aristotle’s Nicomachean ethics. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Khalifa, K. (2013). Is understanding explanatory or objectual? Synthese, 190(6), 1153–1171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kosman, A. (2014). Understanding, explanation, and insight in Aristotle’s posterior analytics. In Virtues of thought: Essays on Plato and Aristotle. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Kotsonis, A. (forthcoming). The Platonic conception of intellectual virtues: its significance for virtue epistemology. Synthese 1–16.Google Scholar
  28. Kvanvig, J. (2003). The value of knowledge and the pursuit of understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kvanvig, J. (2009). The value of understanding. In D. Pritchard, A. Haddock, & A. Millar (Eds.), Epistemic value (pp. 95–112). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Montmarquet, J. A. (1993). Epistemic virtue and doxastic responsibility. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  31. Moss, J. (2014). Right reason in Plato and Aristotle: On the meaning of logos. Phronesis, 59(3), 181–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pritchard, D. (2010). The value of knowledge: Understanding. In A. Haddock, A. Millar, & D. Pritchard (Eds.), the nature and value of knowledge: Three investigations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Riggs, W. D. (2003). Understanding virtue and the virtue of understanding. In M. DePaul & L. Zagzebski (Eds.), Intellectual virtue: Perspectives from ethics and epistemology (pp. 203–227). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Riggs, W. (2010). Open-mindedness. Metaphilosophy, 41(1–2), 172–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Roberts, R. C., & Wood, W. J. (2007). Intellectual virtues: An essay in regulative epistemology. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Schafer, K. (2019). Kant: constitutivism as capacities-first philosophy. Philosophical Explorations, 22(2), 177–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Schafer, K. (forthcoming a). A Kantian virtue epistemology: Rational capacities and transcendental arguments. Synthese 1–24.Google Scholar
  38. Schafer, K. (forthcoming b). Kant’s conception of cognition and our knowledge of things-in-themselves. Manuscript.Google Scholar
  39. Schwab, W. (2015). Explanation in the epistemology of the Meno. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 48, 1–36.Google Scholar
  40. Sosa, E. (1991). Knowledge in perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Turri, J., Alfano, M., & Greco, J. (2018). Virtue Epistemology. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Summer 2018 Edition). retrieved November 2, 2018 from https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2018/entries/epistemology-virtue/.
  42. Woodward, J. (2003). Making things happen. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Zagzebski, L. (1996). Virtues of the mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Zagzebski, L. (2001). Recovering understanding. In M. Steup (Ed.), Knowledge, truth, and duty: Essays on epistemic justification, responsibility, and virtue. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Philosophy DepartmentNanjing UniversityNanjingChina

Personalised recommendations