Advertisement

Synthese

pp 1–29 | Cite as

Memory without content? Radical enactivism and (post)causal theories of memory

  • Kourken MichaelianEmail author
  • André Sant’Anna
S.I.: Radical Views on Cognition
  • 54 Downloads

Abstract

Radical enactivism, an increasingly influential approach to cognition in general, has recently been applied to memory in particular, with Hutto and Peeters (in: Michaelian and Debus (eds) New directions in the philosophy of memory, Routledge, New York, 2018) providing the first systematic discussion of the implications of the approach for mainstream philosophical theories of memory. Hutto and Peeters argue that radical enactivism, which entails a conception of memory traces as contentless, is fundamentally at odds with current causal and postcausal theories, which remain committed to a conception of traces as contentful: on their view, if radical enactivism is right, then the relevant theories are wrong. Partisans of the theories in question might respond to Hutto and Peeters’ argument in two ways. First, they might challenge radical enactivism itself. Second, they might challenge the conditional claim that, if radical enactivism is right, then their theories are wrong. In this paper, we develop the latter response, arguing that, appearances to the contrary notwithstanding, radical enactivism in fact aligns neatly with an emerging tendency in the philosophy of memory: radical enactivists and causal and postcausal theorists of memory have begun to converge, for distinct but compatible reasons, on a contentless conception of memory traces.

Keywords

Episodic memory Radical enactivism Memory traces Mental content Causal theory of memory Simulation theory of memory 

Notes

References

  1. Adams, F., & Aizawa, K. (2008). The bounds of cognition. Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
  2. Arcangeli, M. (2018). Supposition and the imaginative realm: A philosophical inquiry. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Bernecker, S. (2010). Memory: A philosophical study. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bernecker, S. (2017). A causal theory of mnemonic confabulation. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1207.Google Scholar
  5. Bernecker, S., & Grundmann, T. (forthcoming). Knowledge from forgetting. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.Google Scholar
  6. Byrne, A. (2010). Recollection, perception, imagination. Philosophical Studies, 148(1), 15–26.Google Scholar
  7. Campbell, D. (2014). Review of the book Radicalizing Enactivism by D. D. Hutto and E. Myin. Analysis, 74, 174–176.Google Scholar
  8. Cheng, S., & Werning, M. (2016). What is episodic memory if it is a natural kind? Synthese, 193(5), 1345–1385.Google Scholar
  9. Clark, A., & Chalmers, D. (1998). The extended mind. Analysis, 58(1), 7–19.Google Scholar
  10. Colombo, M. (2014). Explaining social norm compliance. A plea for neural representations. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 13(2), 217–238.Google Scholar
  11. De Brigard, F. (2014). Is memory for remembering? Recollection as a form of episodic hypothetical thinking. Synthese, 191(2), 155–185.Google Scholar
  12. Debus, D. (2008). Experiencing the past: A relational account of recollective memory. Dialectica, 62(4), 405–432.Google Scholar
  13. Debus, D. (2017). Memory causation. In S. Bernecker & K. Michaelian (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of philosophy of memory (pp. 63–75). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Dokic, J. (2014). Feeling the past: A two-tiered account of episodic memory. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 5(3), 413–426.Google Scholar
  15. Dokic, J., & Arcangeli, M. (2018). Affective memory: A little help from our imagination. In K. Michaelian, D. Debus, & D. Perrin (Eds.), New directions in the philosophy of memory (pp. 139–157). Abingdon-on-Thames: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Fernández, J. (2016). Epistemic generation in memory. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 92(3), 620–644.Google Scholar
  17. Fernández, J. (2018). The functional character of memory. In K. Michaelian, D. Debus, & D. Perrin (Eds.), New directions in the philosophy of memory (pp. 52–72). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Fivush, R. (2011). The development of autobiographical memory. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 559–582.Google Scholar
  19. Fivush, R., & Nelson, K. (2004). Culture and language in the emergence of autobiographical memory. Psychological Science, 15(9), 573–577.Google Scholar
  20. Frise, M. (2017). Preservationism in the epistemology of memory. The Philosophical Quarterly, 67(268), 486–507.Google Scholar
  21. Genone, J. (2014). Appearance and illusion. Mind, 123(490), 339–376.Google Scholar
  22. Gładziejewski, P. (2015). Explaining cognitive phenomena with internal representations: A mechanistic perspective. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric, 40(1), 63–90.Google Scholar
  23. Goldman, A. (2006). Simulating minds: The philosophy, psychology, and neuroscience of mindreading. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Hoerl, C. (2007). Episodic memory, autobiographical memory, narrative: On three key notions in current approaches to memory development. Philosophical Psychology, 20(5), 621–640.Google Scholar
  25. Hurley, S. (1998). Consciousness in action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Hutto, D. D. (2017). Memory and narrativity. In S. Bernecker & K. Michaelian (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of philosophy of memory (pp. 192–204). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Hutto, D. D., & Myin, E. (2013). Radicalizing enactivism: Basic minds without content. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  28. Hutto, D. D., & Myin, E. (2017). Evolving enactivism: Basic minds meet content. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  29. Hutto, D. D., & Peeters, A. (2018). The roots of remembering: Radically enactive recollecting. In K. Michaelian, D. Debus, & D. Perrin (Eds.), New directions in the philosophy of memory (pp. 97–118). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Intraub, H., Bender, R. S., & Mangels, J. A. (1992). Looking at pictures but remembering scenes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18(1), 180–191.Google Scholar
  31. Irish, M. (2016). Semantic memory as the essential scaffold for future-oriented mental time travel. In K. Michaelian, S. B. Klein, & K. K. Szpunar (Eds.), Seeing the future: Theoretical perspectives on future-oriented mental time travel (pp. 389–408). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  32. James, S. (2017). Epistemic and non-epistemic theories of remembering. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 98, 109–127.Google Scholar
  33. Klein, S. B. (2015). What memory is. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 6(1), 1–38.Google Scholar
  34. Klein, S. B., Loftus, J., & Kihlstrom, J. F. (2002). Memory and temporal experience: The effects of episodic memory loss on an amnesic patient’s ability to remember the past and imagine the future. Social Cognition, 20(5), 353–379.Google Scholar
  35. Lackey, J. (2005). Memory as a generative epistemic source. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 70(3), 636–658.Google Scholar
  36. Loader, P. (2013). Is my memory an extended notebook? Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 4(1), 167–184.Google Scholar
  37. Mahr, J. B., & Csibra, G. (2018). Why do we remember? The communicative function of episodic memory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 41, e1.Google Scholar
  38. Martin, C. B., & Deutscher, M. (1966). Remembering. The Philosophical Review, 75(2), 161–196.Google Scholar
  39. Michaelian, K. (2011). Generative memory. Philosophical Psychology, 24(3), 323–342.Google Scholar
  40. Michaelian, K. (2012). Is external memory memory? Biological memory and extended mind. Consciousness and Cognition, 21(3), 1154–1165.Google Scholar
  41. Michaelian, K. (2015). Opening the doors of memory: Is declarative memory a natural kind? Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 6(6), 475–482.Google Scholar
  42. Michaelian, K. (2016). Confabulating, misremembering, relearning: The simulation theory of memory and unsuccessful remembering. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1857.Google Scholar
  43. Michaelian, K. (2016). Mental time travel: Episodic memory and our knowledge of the personal past. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  44. Michaelian, K. (2018). Episodic and semantic memory and imagination: The need for definitions. American Journal of Psychology, 131(1), 99–103. Review essay on M. S. Humphreys and K. A. Chalmers, Thinking about Human Memory.Google Scholar
  45. Michaelian, K. (forthcoming). Confabulating as unreliable imagining: In defence of the simulationist account of unsuccessful remembering. Topoi.Google Scholar
  46. Michaelian, K., Perrin, D., & Sant’Anna, A. (forthcoming). Continuities and discontinuities between imagination and memory: The view from philosophy. In A. Abraham, (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of imagination. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Michaelian, K., & Robins, S. K. (2018). Beyond the causal theory? Fifty years after Martin and Deutscher. In K. Michaelian, D. Debus, & D. Perrin (Eds.), New directions in the philosophy of memory (pp. 13–32). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  48. Myin, E., & Hutto, D. D. (2015). REC: Just radical enough. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric, 41(1), 61–71.Google Scholar
  49. Nelson, K., & Fivush, R. (2004). The emergence of autobiographical memory: A social cultural developmental theory. Psychological Review, 111(2), 486.Google Scholar
  50. Noë, A. (2004). Action in perception. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  51. O’Brien, G. J. (1991). Is connectionism commonsense? Philosophical Psychology, 4(2), 165–178.Google Scholar
  52. O’Regan, J. K., & Noë, A. (2001). A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(5), 939–973.Google Scholar
  53. Perrin, D. (2016). Asymmetries in subjective time. In K. Michaelian, S. B. Klein, & K. K. Szpunar (Eds.), Seeing the future: theoretical perspectives on future-oriented mental time travel (pp. 39–61). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Perrin, D. (2018). A case for procedural causality in episodic recollection. In K. Michaelian, D. Debus, & D. Perrin (Eds.), New directions in the philosophy of memory (pp. 33–51). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  55. Perrin, D., & Michaelian, K. (2017). Memory as mental time travel. In S. Bernecker & K. Michaelian (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of philosophy of memory (pp. 228–239). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  56. Ramsey, W., Stich, S., & Garan, J. (1990). Connectionism, eliminativism, and the future of folk psychology. In D. J. Cole, J. H. Fetzer, & T. L. Rankin (Eds.), Philosophy, mind, and cognitive inquiry: Resources for understanding mental processes (pp. 117–144). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  57. Roberts, T. (2013). Review of Radicalizing enactivism by D. D. Hutto and E. Myin. Notre Dame philosophical reviews. http://ndpr.nd.edu/news/40035-radicalizing-enactivism-basicminds-without-content/. Accessed: 04/06/2018.
  58. Robins, S. (2016). Misremembering. Philosophical Psychology, 29(3), 432–447.Google Scholar
  59. Robins, S. (2016). Representing the past: Memory traces and the causal theory of memory. Philosophical Studies, 173(11), 2993–3013.Google Scholar
  60. Robins, S. (2017). Memory traces. In S. Bernecker & K. Michaelian (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of philosophy of memory (pp. 76–887). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  61. Robins, S. (forthcoming a). Confabulation and constructive memory. Synthese.Google Scholar
  62. Robins, S. K. (forthcoming b). Mnemonic confabulation. Topoi.Google Scholar
  63. Sant’Anna, A. (2018). Mental time travel and the philosophy of memory. Unisinos Journal of Philosophy, 19(1), 52–62.Google Scholar
  64. Sant’Anna, A., & Michaelian, K. (forthcoming). Thinking about events: A pragmatist account of the objects of episodic hypothetical thought. Review of Philosophy and Psychology.Google Scholar
  65. Senor, T. D. (2007). Preserving preservationism: A reply to Lackey. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 74(1), 199–208.Google Scholar
  66. Shanton, K., & Goldman, A. (2010). Simulation theory. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 1(4), 527–538.Google Scholar
  67. Shapiro, L. (2014). Review of Radicalizing Enactivism by D. D. Hutto and E. Myin. Mind, 123, 213–220.Google Scholar
  68. Sutton, J. (1998). Philosophy and memory traces: Descartes to connectionism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  69. Sutton, J. (2010). Exograms and interdisciplinarity: History, the extended mind, and the civilizing process. In R. Menary (Ed.), The extended mind (pp. 189–225). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  70. Sutton, J., & Williamson, K. (2014). Embodied remembering. In L. Shapiro (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of embodied cognition (pp. 315–325). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  71. Szpunar, K. K., Spreng, R. N., & Schacter, D. L. (2016). Toward a taxonomy of future thinking. In K. Michaelian, S. B. Klein, K. K. Szpunar (Eds.), Seeing the Future: Theoretical Perspectives on Future-Oriented Mental Time Travel, pages 21–35. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  72. Thompson, E. (2007). Mind in life: Biology, phenomenology, and the sciences of mind. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  73. Travis, C. (2004). The silence of the senses. Mind, 113(449), 57–94.Google Scholar
  74. Tulving, E. (1972). Episodic and semantic memory. In E. Tulving & W. Donaldson (Eds.), Organization of memory (pp. 381–402). Cambridge: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  75. Tulving, E. (2005). Episodic memory and autonoesis: Uniquely human? In H. S. Terrace & J. Metcalfe (Eds.), The missing link in cognition: Origins of self-reflective consciousness (pp. 3–56). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  76. Tulving, E. (2007). Are there 256 different kinds of memory? In J. S. Nairne (Ed.), The foundations of remembering: Essays in Honor of Henry L. Roediger III (pp. 39–52). Abingdon on Thames: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  77. Varela, F., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  78. Vosgerau, G. (2010). Memory and content. Consciousness and Cognition, 19(3), 838–846.Google Scholar
  79. Werning, M., & Cheng, S. (2017). Taxonomy and unity of memory. In S. Bernecker & K. Michaelian (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Memory (pp. 7–20). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Philosophy of MemoryUniversité Grenoble AlpesGrenobleFrance

Personalised recommendations