The standard view in philosophy treats pains as phenomenally conscious mental states. This view has a number of corollaries, including that it is generally taken to rule out the existence of unfelt pains. The primary argument in support of the standard view is that it supposedly corresponds with the commonsense conception of pain. In this paper, we challenge this doctrine about the commonsense conception of pain, and with it the support offered for the standard view, by presenting the results of a series of new empirical studies that indicate that lay people not only tend to believe that unfelt pains are possible, but actually, quite common.
KeywordsPain Unfelt pain Experimental philosophy Conscious mental states Commonsense conception of pain
This work was supported in part by a FHSS JRC Small Grant from Victoria University of Wellington. We would like to thank the audiences at Ruhr University Bochum, University of Glasgow, University of Bern, Victoria University of Wellington, University of Auckland, Nanzan University, as well as the Philosophy of Science Association, the International Congress of Psychology, and the Society for Philosophy and Psychology for their helpful comments.
- Aydede, M. (2006). Introduction: A critical and quasi-historical essay on theories of pain. In M. Aydede (Ed.), Pain: New papers on its nature and the methodology of its study (pp. 1–58). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Aydede, M. (2009). Pain. In E. Zalta (Ed.), The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Spring 2013 Edition). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2013/entries/pain/.
- Dennett, D. (1986). Content and consciousness (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Dretske, F. (2006). The epistemology of pain. In M. Aydede (Ed.), Pain: New papers on its nature and the methodology of its study (pp. 59–74). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Kim, H., Poth, N., Reuter, K., & Sytsma, J. (2016). Where is your pain? A cross-cultural comparison of the concept of pain in Americans and South Koreans. Studia Philosophica Estonica, 9(1), 136–169.Google Scholar
- Kripke, S. (1980). Naming and necessity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Orwell, G. (1938/1952). Homage to Catalonia. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar
- Papineau, D. (2007). Phenomenal concepts are not demonstrative. In M. McCabe & M. Textor (Eds.), Perspectives on Perception (Vol. 6). Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
- Reuter, K. (2011). Distinguishing the appearance from the reality of pain. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 18(9-10), 94–109.Google Scholar
- Reuter, K., Phillips, D., & Sytsma, J. (2014). Hallucinating pain. In J. Sytsma (Ed.), Advances in experimental philosophy of mind. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
- Sytsma, J. (2010). Dennett’s theory of the folk theory of consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 17(3–4), 107–130.Google Scholar
- Sytsma, J. (2014a). Advances in experimental philosophy of mind. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
- Sytsma, J. (2014b). The robots of the dawn of experimental philosophy of mind. In E. Machery & E. O’Neill (Eds.), Current controversies in experimental philosophy. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Sytsma, J., & Livengood, J. (2015). The theory and practice of experimental philosophy. Peterborough: Broadview Press.Google Scholar
- Tye, M. (2006). Another look at representationalism about pain. In M. Aydede (Ed.), Pain: New papers on its nature and the methodology of its study. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar