, Volume 196, Issue 12, pp 5137–5152 | Cite as

The essence of grounding

  • Justin ZylstraEmail author


I develop a reduction of grounding to essence. My approach is to think about the relation between grounding and essence on the model of a certain concept of existential dependence. I extend this concept of existential dependence in a couple of ways and argue that these extensions provide a reduction of grounding to essence if we use sorted variables that range over facts and take it that for a fact to obtain is for it to exist. I then use the account to resolve various issues surrounding the concept of grounding and its connection with essence; apply the account to paradigm cases and to the impure logic of grounding; and respond to objections.


Metaphysics Grounding Essence Reduction 



Thanks to Louis deRosset, Kit Fine, Kathrin Koslicki, Donnchadh O’Conaill, Mike Raven, Riin Sirkel, Tuomas Tahko, and to two anonymous referees for helpful comments.


  1. Carnino, P. (2015). On the reduction of grounding to essence. Studia Philosophica Estonica, 7(2), 56–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Correia, F. (2006). Generic essence, objectual essence, and modality. Nous, 40(4), 753–767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Correia, F. (2008). Ontological dependence. Philosophy Compass, 3(1013), 1032.Google Scholar
  4. Correia, F. (2012). On the reduction of necessity to essence. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 84(3), 639–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Correia, F. (2013). Metaphysical grounds and essence. In M. Hoeltje, B. Schnieder, & A. Steinberg (Eds.), Varieties of dependence, basic philosophical concepts series (pp. 271–96). Mnchen: Philosophia.Google Scholar
  6. Correia, F., & Schnieder, B. (2012). Metaphysical grounding: understanding the structure of reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Correia, F., & Skiles, A. (2017). Grounding, essence, and identity. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research,. Scholar
  8. Dasgupta, S. (2016). Metaphysical rationalism. Nous, 50(1), 1–40. Scholar
  9. deRosset, L. (2013). Grounding explanations. Philosophers’ Imprint, 13(7), 1.Google Scholar
  10. deRosset, L. (2014). On weak ground. Review of Symbolic Logic, 7(4), 713–744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fine, K. (1994a). Essence and modality. In J. Tomberlin (Ed.), Philosophical perspectives 8: logic and language (pp. 1–16). Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview.Google Scholar
  12. Fine, K. (1994b). Ontological dependence. Proceedings of the aristotelian society, 95, 269–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fine, K. (1995a). Senses of essence. In Walter Sinnott-Armstrong (Ed.), Modality, morality, and belief (Vol. 5373). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Fine, K. (1995b). The logic of essence. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 24, 241–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fine, K. (2001). The question of realism. Philosophers’ Imprint, 1(1), 1–25.Google Scholar
  16. Fine, K. (Ed.) (2005). Necessity and non-existence’. In Modality and tense. Philosophical papers, Chapter 9 (pp. 321–354). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Fine, K. (2012a). A guide to ground. In F. Correia & B. Schnieder (Eds.), Metaphysical grounding: Understanding the structure of reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Fine, K. (2012b). The pure logic of ground. Review of Symbolic Logic, 5(1), 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fine, K. (2015). Unified foundations for essence and ground. Journal of the American Philosophical Association, 1(2), 296–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Glazier, M. (2017). Essentialist explanation. Philosophical Studies, Philosophical Studies, 174, 2871–2889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Koslicki, K. (2012). Varieties of ontological dependence. In F. Correia & B. Schnieder (Eds.), Metaphysical grounding: Understanding the structure of reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Koslicki, K. (2015). The coarse-grainedness of grounding. Oxford Studies in Metaphysics, 9, 304–344.Google Scholar
  23. Leuenberger, S. (2014). Grounding and necessity. Inquiry, 57, 151–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lowe, E. J., Tahko, T. (2015). Ontological dependence. In Zalta, E. N. (ed.) Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. (2015).
  25. Prior, A. N. (1971). Platonism and quantification. In P. T. Geach, & A. J. P. Kenny (Eds.), Objects of thought (pp. 31–47). Oxford: Oxford, University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Raven, M. (2015). Ground. Philosophy. Compass, 10(5), 322–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rosen, G. (2010). Metaphysical dependence: Grounding and reduction. In R. Hale & A. Hoffman (Eds.), Modality: Metaphysics, logic, and epistemology (pp. 109–136). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rosen, G. (2015). Real definition. Analytic Philosophy, 56(3), 189–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Schaffer, J. (2009). On what grounds what. In D. Chalmers, D. Manley, & R. Wasserman (Eds.), Metametaphysics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Schaffer, J. (2016). Grounding in the image of causation. Philosophical Studies, 173(1), 49–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Schnieder, B. (2017). Grounding and dependence. Synthese.
  32. Skiles, A. (2015). Against grounding necessitarianism. Erkenntnis, 80(4), 717–751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Teitel, T. (2017). Contingent existence and the reduction of modality to essence. Mind,. Scholar
  34. Thompson, N. (2016). Metaphysical interdependence. In Mark Jago (Ed.), Reality making (pp. 38–56). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Williamson, T. (2013). Modal logic as metaphysics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wilson, A. (2017). Metaphysical causation. Nous. Scholar
  37. Wilson, J. (2014). No work for a theory of grounding. Inquiry, 57(5–6), 535579.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of VermontBurlingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations