Advertisement

Synthese

pp 1–21 | Cite as

Historiographic narratives and empirical evidence: a case study

  • Efraim WallachEmail author
Article

Abstract

Several scholars observed that narratives about the human past are evaluated comparatively. Few attempts have been made, however, to explore how such evaluations are actually done. Here I look at a lengthy “contest” among several historiographic narratives, all constructed to make sense of another one—the biblical story of the conquest of Canaan. I conclude that the preference of such narratives can be construed as a rational choice. In particular, an easily comprehensible and emotionally evocative narrative will give way to a complex and mundane one, when the latter provides a more coherent account of the consensually accepted body of evidence. This points to a fundamental difference between historiographic narratives and fiction, contrary to some influential opinions in the philosophy of historiography. Such historiographic narratives have similarities with hypotheses and narrative explanations in natural science.

Keywords

Historiography Historiographic narratives Archaeology Narrative explanations Case study 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I am grateful to Yemima Ben-Menahem, Arnon Levi and two anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments on earlier versions of this manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Albright, W. F. (1934). The Kyle memorial excavation in Bethel. Bulletin of the American schools of Oriental research, 56, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Albright, W. F. (1939). The Israelite conquest of Canaan in the light of archaeology. Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research, 74, 11–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Albright, W. F. (1940). From the Stone Age to Christianity, Monotheism and the Historical Process. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
  4. Albright, W. F. (1956). Albrecht Alt. Journal of Biblical Literature, 75(3), 169–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Albright, W. F. (1968). Yahweh and the Gods of Canaan: A Historical Analysis of Two Contrasting Faiths. London: The University of London Press.Google Scholar
  6. Alt, A. (1925). Die Landnahme Der Israeliten in Palästina: Territorialgeschichtliche Studien. Druckerei der Werkgemeinschaft.Google Scholar
  7. Alt, A. (1929) [1953]. Der Gott der Väter. In Kleine Schriften zur Geschichte des Volkes Israel (Vol. 1, pp. 1–78). München: C.H.Beck.Google Scholar
  8. Alt, A. (1936) [1953]. Josua. In: Kleine Schriften zur Geschichte des Volkes Israel (Vol. 1, pp. 176–192). München: C.H.Beck.Google Scholar
  9. Ankersmit, F. R. (1983). Narrative logic: A semantic analysis of the historian’s language (Vol. 7). The Hague: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  10. Ankersmit, F. R. (1989). Historiography and postmodernism. History and Theory, 28(2), 137–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ankersmit, F. R. (2012). Meaning, truth, and reference in historical representation. Louvain: Leuven University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ashton, T. S. (1968). The industrial revolution: 1760–1830. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Barca, S. (2011). Energy, property, and the industrial revolution narrative. Ecological Economics, 70(7), 1309–1315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Beatty, J. (2017). Narrative possibility and narrative explanation. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 62, 31–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Berry, S. (2014). Explaining roman history: A case study. In M. I. Kaiser, O. I. Scholz, D. Plenge, & A. Hüttemann (Eds.), Explanation in the special sciences (pp. 220–237). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  16. BonJour, L. (1985). The structure of empirical knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Burian, R. M. (2001). The dilemma of case studies resolved: The virtues of using case studies in the history and philosophy of science. Perspectives on Science, 9(4), 383–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Carroll, N. (1990). Interpretation, history and narrative. The Monist, 73(2), 134–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Carroll, N. (2001). On the narrative connection. In S. Benjamin & W. van Peer (Eds.), New perspectives on narrative perspective (pp. 21–41). Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  20. Chang, H. (2004). Inventing temperature: Measurement and scientific progress. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Chang, H. (2011). Beyond case-studies: History as philosophy. In S. Mauskopf & T. Schmaltz (Eds.), Integrating history and philosophy of science (pp. 109–124). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Chapman, R., & Wylie, A. (2016). Evidential reasoning in archaeology. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
  23. Cleland, C. E. (2002). Methodological and epistemic differences between historical science and experimental science. Philosophy of Science, 69(3), 447–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Cleland, C. E. (2011). Prediction and explanation in historical natural science. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 62(3), 551–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Currie, A. (2014). Narratives, mechanisms and progress in historical science. Synthese, 191(6), 1163–1183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Currie, A. (2015a). Philosophy of Science and the Curse of the Case Study. In C. Daly (Ed.), The Palgrave Handbook of Philosophical Methods (pp. 553–572). London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Currie, A. (2015b). Marsupial lions and methodological omnivory: Function, success and reconstruction in paleobiology. Biology and Philosophy, 30(2), 187–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Currie, A. (2018). Rock, bone, and ruin: An optimist’s guide to the historical sciences. Cambridge: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Currie, A., & Sterelny, K. (2017). In defence of story-telling. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 62, 14–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Dever, W. G. (1998). Israelite origin and the ‘Nomadic Ideal’: Can archaeology separate fact from fiction? In S. Gitin, A. Mazar, & E. Stern (Eds.), Mediterranean peoples in transition: Thirteenth to early tenth centuries BCE (T. Dothan Festschrift) (pp. 220–237). Jerusalem: Israel Exploration Society.Google Scholar
  31. Dever, W. G. (2003). Who Were the Early Israelites, and Where Did They Come From?. Grand Rapids, Michigan: William. B. Eerdmans Publishing.Google Scholar
  32. Dever, W. G. (2011). Recent archaeological discoveries and biblical research. Seattle and London: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
  33. Dray, W. (1954). Explanatory narrative in history. The Philosophical Quarterly, 4(14), 15–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Dray, W. H. (1971). On the nature and role of narrative in historiography. History and theory, 10(2), 153–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Faust, A. (2006). Israel’s Ethnogenesis: Settlement, Interaction, Expansion and Resistance. London and Oakville: Equinox Publishing.Google Scholar
  36. Finkelstein, I. (1988a). The archaeology of the Israelite settlement. Jerusalem: Israel Exploration Society.Google Scholar
  37. Finkelstein, I. (1988b). The Rise of Early Israel: Archaeology and Long-Term History. In S. Ahituv & E. D. Oren (Eds.), The Origin of Early Israel-Current Debate: Biblical, Historical and Archaeological Perspectives (pp. 7–39). Beer-Sheva: Ben-Gurion University of the Negev Press.Google Scholar
  38. Finkelstein, I. (1995). The Great Transformation: The ‘Conquest’ of the Highlands Frontiers and the Rise of the Territorial States. In T. E. Levy (Ed.), The archaeology of society in the Holy Land (pp. 349–365). New York: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
  39. Finkelstein, I., & Na’aman, N. (Eds.). (1994). From nomadism to monarchy: Archaeological and historical aspects of early Israel. Jerusalem: Yad Izhak Ben-Zvi.Google Scholar
  40. Forber, P., & Griffith, E. (2011). Historical reconstruction: Gaining epistemic access to the deep past. Philosophy and Theory in Biology, 3, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Fritz, V. (1987). Conquest or Settlement? The Early Iron Age in Palestine. The Biblical Archaeologist, 50(2), 84–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Glennan, S. (2010). Ephemeral mechanisms and historical explanation. Erkenntnis, 72(2), 251–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Glennan, S. (2014). Aspects of human historiographic explanation: A view from the philosophy of science. In M. I. Kaiser, O. I. Scholz, D. Plenge, & A. Hüttemann (Eds.), Explanation in the special sciences (pp. 273–291). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Golding, W. (1955). The inheritors. San Diego: Harcourt Inc.Google Scholar
  45. Gottwald, N. K. (1979). Tribes of Yahweh: A sociology of the religion of liberated Israel, 1250–1050 BCE. New York: Orbis Books.Google Scholar
  46. Gottwald, N. K. (1984). The Israelite settlement as a social revolutionary movement. In Biblical archaeology today: Proceedings of the international congress on biblical archaeology (pp. 34–36). Jerusalem: Israel Exploration Society.Google Scholar
  47. Griffioen, S. (2016). Modernity and the problem of its Christian past: The Geistgeschichten of Blumberg, Berger, and Gauschet. History and Theory, 55, 185–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Hempel, C. G. (1965). Aspects of scientific explanation. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  49. Hull, D. L. (1975). Central subjects and historical narratives. History and theory, 14(3), 253–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Jeffares, B. (2010). Guessing the future of the past. Biology and Philosophy, 25(1), 125–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Jenkins, K. (2008). Rethinking History. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  52. Kenyon, K. M. (1954). Excavation in Jericho. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland, 84(1/2), 103–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Kinzel, K. (2016). Pluralism in historiography: A case study of case studies. In T. Sauer & R. Scholl (Eds.), The philosophy of historical case studies (pp. 123–149). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  54. Kosso, P. (2001). Knowing the past: Philosophical issues of history and archaeology. New York: Humanity Books.Google Scholar
  55. Kosso, P. (2009). Philosophy of historiography. In A. Tucker (Ed.), A Companion to the Philosophy of History and Historiography (pp 7-25). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  56. Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  57. Kuukkanen, J.-M. (2012). The missing narrativist turn in the historiography of science. History and Theory, 51(3), 340–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Kuukkanen, J.-M. (2015). Postnarrativist philosophy of historiography. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Kuukkanen, J.-M. (Forthcoming). Is narrativism empirically plausible? What we can learn from the case study approach for the philosophy of historiography. To be published in ITINERA.Google Scholar
  60. Lipton, P. (2001). Is explanation a guide to inference? A reply to Wesley C. Salmon. In G. Hon & S. R. Rakover (Eds.), Explanation: Theoretical approaches and applications (pp. 7–25). Dordrecht: Springer.‏Google Scholar
  61. Little, D. (2017). Philosophy of history. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2017/entries/history.
  62. Marquet-Krause, J. (1949). Les Fouilles de ‘Ay (Et-Tell), 1933–1935. Paris: Geuther.Google Scholar
  63. Mazar, A. (1990). Archaeology of the land of the Bible. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  64. McAllister, J. W. (2017). Using history as evidence in philosophy of science: A methodological critique. Journal of the Philosophy of History, 12(2), 239–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Mendenhall, G. E. (1962). The Hebrew Conquest of Palestine. The Biblical Archaeologist, 25(3), 66–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Mendenhall, G. E. (1974). The Tenth Generation: The Origins of the Biblical Tradition. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  67. Mink, L. O. (1978). Narrative form as a cognitive instrument. In R. H. Canary & H. Kozicki (Eds.), The writing of history: Literary form and historical understanding (pp. 129–149). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  68. Moorey, P. R. S. (1991). A century of biblical archaeology. Westminster: John Knox Press.Google Scholar
  69. Morgan, M. S. (2017). Narrative ordering and explanation. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 62, 86–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Noth, M. (1938). Grundsätzliches zur geschichtlichen Deutung archäologischer Befunde auf dem Boden Palästinas. Palästina Jahrbuch des deutschen evangelischen Instituts für Altertumwissenschaft des Heiligen Landes in Jerusalem., 37, 129–149.Google Scholar
  71. Noth, M. (1958). Geschichte Israels. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
  72. Pietsch, W. (2016). Two modes of reasoning with case studies. In T. Sauer & R. Scholl (Eds.), The philosophy of historical case studies (pp. 49–67). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  73. Pitt, J. C. (2001). The dilemma of case studies: Toward a Heraclitian philosophy of science. Perspectives on Science, 9(4), 373–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Quine, W. V. O., & Ullian, J. S. (1978). The web of beliefs. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  75. Rosales, A. (2017). Theories that narrate the world: Ronald A. Fisher’s mass selection and Sewall Wright’s shifting balance. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 62, 22–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Roth, P. A. (1989). How narratives explain. Social Research, 56(2), 449–478.Google Scholar
  77. Roth, P. A. (2017). Essentially narrative explanations. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 62, 42–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Sauer, T., & Scholl, R. (Eds.) (2016). The philosophy of historical case studies. In Boston studies in the philosophy and history of science (Vol. 319). Berlin: Springer.‏Google Scholar
  79. Schickore, J. (2011). More thoughts on HPS: Another 20 years later. Perspectives on Science, 19(4), 453–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Scholl, R., & Räz, T. (2016). Towards a methodology for integrated history and philosophy of science. In T. Sauer & R. Scholl (Eds.), The philosophy of historical case studies (pp. 69–91). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  81. Silberman, N. A. (1993). A prophet from amongst you: The life of Yigael Yadin: Soldier, scholar, and mythmaker of modern Israel. Boston: Addison-Wesley Longman.Google Scholar
  82. Tucker, A. (2004). Our knowledge of the past: A philosophy of historiography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Tucker, A. (Ed.). (2009). A companion to the philosophy of history and historiography (Blackwell Companions to Philosophy). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  84. Tucker, A. (2011). Historical science, over-and underdetermined: A study of Darwin’s inference of origins. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 62(4), 805–829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Tufnell, O. (1958). Lachish IV (the Bronze Age). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  86. Turner, D. D. (2007). Making prehistory: Historical science and the scientific realism debate. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Velleman, J. (2003). Narrative explanation. The philosophical review, 112(1), 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Wallach, E. (2018). Bayesian representation of a prolonged archaeological debate. Synthese, 195(1), 401–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. White, M. (1965). Foundation of historical knowledge. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  90. White, H. (1973). Metahistory: The Historical Imagination in Nineteenth-century Europe. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  91. White, H. (1980). The value of narrativity in the representation of reality. Critical Inquiry, 7(1), 5–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. White, H. (1984). The question of narrative in contemporary historical theory. History and Theory, 23(1), 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. White, H. (2009). The content of the form: Narrative discourse and historical representation. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  94. Wise, M. N. (2011). Science as (historical) narrative. Erkenntnis, 75(3), 349–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Wright, G. E. (1946). The literary and historical problem of Joshua 10 and Judges 1. Journal of Near Eastern Studies, 5(2), 105–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Yadin, Y. (1965). Military and archaeological aspects of the conquest of canaan in the book of Joshua. The Jewish Education Committee of New York in cooperation with the World Jewish Bible Society.Google Scholar
  97. Yadin, Y. (1982). Is the Biblical Account of the Israelite Conquest of Canaan Historically Reliable? Biblical Archaeology Review, 8(2), 16–23.Google Scholar
  98. Yadin, Y. (1984). Biblical archaeology today: The archaeological aspect. In Biblical archaeology today; proceedings of the international congress on biblical archaeology, Jerusalem (pp. 69–91). Jerusalem: Israel Exploration Society.Google Scholar
  99. Yadin, Y., Aharoni, Y., Dunayevski, E., Dotan, T., Amiran, R., & Perrot, J. (1960). Hazor II: An Account of the Second Season of Excavations, 1956. Jerusalem: Israel Exploration Society.Google Scholar
  100. Yeivin, S. (1937). The exodus and the conquest (current status of the problems). In N. H. Torczyner (Ed.), Klausner Festschrift (pp. 67–86). Tel-Aviv: Amanut. (Hebrew).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyThe Hebrew University of JerusalemJerusalemIsrael

Personalised recommendations