Quantity evaluations in Yudja: judgements, language and cultural practice
- 70 Downloads
In this paper we explore the interpretation of quantity expressions in Yudja, an indigenous language spoken in the Amazonian basin, showing that while the language allows reference to exact cardinalities, it does not generally allow reference to exact measure values. It does, however, allow non-exact comparison along continuous dimensions. We use this data to argue that the grammar of exact measurement is distinct from a grammar allowing the expression of exact cardinalities, and that the grammar of counting and the grammar of measurement may use numerals with different, though related interpretations. As Yudja shows, the language of measurement is not automatically acquired along with the knowledge of exact numeral expressions. We show that the ‘gap’ between prelinguistic intuitions about quantity in terms of numerosity and counting, which is bridged by the learning of language expressing exact cardinality, is paralleled by a similar gap between prelinguistic intuitions about quantity on a continuous dimension and measuring: this gap too must be bridged by language which expresses exact measure values. Our results suggest that the enculturation process by which we develop skills to perform abstract operations in the domain of measurement is (1) language dependent and (2) distinct from the process by which we learn to perform abstract calculations in the cardinal domain.
KeywordsMathematical cognition and enculturation Number Quantity judgements Language Mass/count nouns Cardinality Counting Semantics of measurement
First we would like to thank the Yudja people who generously contributed their time and knowledge to this documentation project. We would like to thank two anonymous reviewers for very helpful comments on the first version of this paper, and to Markus Pantsar and Catarina Dutilh Novaes for advice and encouragement in making the revisions. Early versions of this material were presented at the 7th Cambridge conference on Language Endangerment (Cambridge UK, July 2017), at the Workshop on Language and Literacy Development in Multilingual and Multidialectal Contexts (Bar-Ilan University, March 2018) and at the Multilingualism and Multiculturalism Workshop (Bar Ilan University June 2018) We thank the participants at all these events for their helpful comments. We would like to acknowledge the financial support of the American Philosophical Society, and of dissertation grants to Suzi Lima from the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior and the National Science Foundation.
Funding was provided by Capes/Fulbright and NSF Dissertation Grant (Grant No. BCS-1226449).
- Boolos, G. (1990). The standard equality of numbers. In G. Boolos (Ed.), Meaning and method: Essays in Honor of Hilary Putnam (pp. 261–277). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Reprinted in Logic, logic and logic, pp. 202–219, by R. Jeffrey, Ed., 1998, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.).Google Scholar
- Bunt, H. C. (1985). Mass terms and model-theoretic semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Cantlon, J. F., & Brannon, E. M. (2007). How much does number matter to a monkey (Macaca mulatta)? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 33(1), 32.Google Scholar
- Cheng, L. L.-S., & Sybesma, R. (1998). Yi-wan Tang, yi-ge Tang: Classifiers and massifiers. Tsing Hua Journal of Chinese Studies, New Series, 28(3), 385–412.Google Scholar
- Doetjes, J. S. (1997). Quantifiers and selection: On the distribution of quantifying expressions in French, Dutch and English. The Hague: HAG.Google Scholar
- Doetjes, J. S. (2012). Count/mass distinctions across languages. In C. Maienborn, K. von Heusinger, & P. Portner (Eds.), Semantics: An international handbook of natural language meaning, part III (pp. 2559–2580). Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
- Fargetti, C. (2001). Estudo fonológico e morfossintático da língua juruna. PhD dissertation, UNICAMP.Google Scholar
- Gil, D. (2013). Numeral Classifiers. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (Eds.), The World Atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.Google Scholar
- Gillon, C. (2010). The mass/count distinction in Innu-aimun: Implications for the meaning of plurality. In WSCLA 15: The fifteenth workshop on structure and constituency in languages of the Americas (pp. 12–29).Google Scholar
- Heck, R. (2011). Frege’s theorem. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Khrizman, K., Landman, F., Lima, S., Rothstein, S., & Schvarcz, B. (2015). Portion readings are count readings not measure readings. In T. Brochhagen, F. Roelofsen & N. Theiler (Eds.), Proceedings of the 20th Amsterdam colloquium (pp. 197–206). http://semanticsarchive.net/Archive/mVkOTk2N/AC2015-proceedings.pdf. Accessed 21 Nov 2018.
- Krifka, M. (1989). Nominal reference, temporal constitution and quantification in event semantics. In R. Bartsch, J. van Benthem, & P. von Emde Boas (Eds.), Semantics and contextual expression. Dordrecht: Foris Publication.Google Scholar
- Krifka, M. (1992). Thematic relations as links between nominal reference and temporal constitution. In I. A. Sag & A. Szabolcsi (Eds.), Lexical matters. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information.Google Scholar
- Landman, F. (2016). Iceberg semantics for count nouns and mass nouns: The evidence from portions. In The Baltic international yearbook of cognition, logic and communication (Vol. 11). https://doi.org/10.4148/1944-3676.1107.
- Li, X. P. (2011). On the semantics of classifiers in Chinese. Ph.D. dissertation, Bar-Ilan University.Google Scholar
- Li, X. P., & Rothstein, S. (2012). Measure readings of Mandarin classifier phrases and the particle de. Language and Linguistics, 13(4), 693–741.Google Scholar
- Lima, S. (2014). The grammar of individuation and counting. PhD dissertation, UMass Amherst.Google Scholar
- Lima, S. (2016). Container constructions in Yudja: Locatives, individuation and measure. In Baltic international yearbook of cognition, logic and communication (Vol. 11). https://doi.org/10.4148/1944-3676.1109.
- Lima, S. (2018a). Quantity judgment studies in Yudja (Tupi): Acquisition and interpretation of nouns. Glossa. Special volume: The acquisition of mass-count distinction across languages and populations.Google Scholar
- Lima, S. (2018b). New perspectives on the count-mass distinction: Understudied languages and psycholinguistics. Language and Linguistics Compass. Google Scholar
- Lima, S., Li, P., & Snedeker, J. (2016). Counting on a count list: what Yudja tells us about number word acquisition. Poster at the 41st CUNY University conference on language development. Boston, Nov 4–6, 2016.Google Scholar
- Lima, S., & Rothstein, S. (2017). Borrowing of Brazilian Portuguese measure words in Yudja. Talk presented at Cambridge conference on language endangerment.Google Scholar
- Lima, S., & Snedeker, J. (2015). On the acquisition and interpretation of container phrases in English. In 28th Annual CUNY conference on human sentence processing, USC.Google Scholar
- Linnebo, Ø. (2009). The individuation of the natural numbers. In O. Bueno & Ø. Linnebo (Eds.), New waves in philosophy of mathematics. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Mathieu, E. (2012). On the mass/count distinction in Ojibwe. In D. Massam (Ed.), Count and mass across languages. Oxford: Oxford Press.Google Scholar
- Mendonça, P. (2017). Corpo preparado, alma protegida: jeitos de cuidar e modos de aprender no crescimento da criança Yudja. MA thesis, University of São Paulo.Google Scholar
- Parsons, C. (1995). Frege’s theory of number. In W. Demopolous (Ed.), Frege’s philosophy of mathematics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Rothstein, S. (2013). A fregean semantics for number words. In M. Aloni, M. Franke & F. Roelofsen (Eds.), Proceedings of the 19th Amsterdam Colloquium (pp. 179–186). https://www.events.illc.uva.nl/AC/AC2013/uploaded_files/inlineitem/23_Rothstein.pdf. Accessed 21 Nov 2018.
- Rothstein, S. (2016). Counting and Measuring: A theoretical and crosslinguistic account. In The Baltic international yearbook of cognition, logic and communication (Vol. 11). http://dx.doi.org/10.4148/1944-3676.1106.
- Rothstein, S. (to appear). Count nouns vs. mass nouns. In L. Matthewson, C. Meier, H. Rullman & T. E. Zimmerman (Eds.), Wiley’s companion to semantics (SemCom). Downloadable from https://www.academia.edu/34700872/Count_nouns_vs._Mass_nouns. Accessed 21 Nov 2018.
- Sawatzki, C. (2015). Context counts: The potential of realistic problems to expose and extend social and mathematical understandings. In M. Marshman, V. Geiger & A. Bennison (Eds.), Mathematics education in the margins (Proceedings of the 38th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia) (pp. 555–562). Sunshine Coast: MERGA.Google Scholar
- Scontras, G. (2014). The semantics of measurment. Ph.D. dissertation, Harvard University.Google Scholar
- Wiltschko, M. (2012). Decomposing the mass/count distinction: Evidence from languages that lack it. In Count and mass across languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar