Belief, credence, and evidence
- 224 Downloads
I explore how rational belief and rational credence relate to evidence. I begin by looking at three cases where rational belief and credence seem to respond differently to evidence: cases of naked statistical evidence, lotteries, and hedged assertions. I consider an explanation for these cases, namely, that one ought not form beliefs on the basis of statistical evidence alone, and raise worries for this view. Then, I suggest another view that explains how belief and credence relate to evidence. My view focuses on the possibilities that the evidence makes salient. I argue that this makes better sense of the difference between rational credence and rational belief than other accounts.
KeywordsBelief Credence Evidence Rationality Lottery paradox Statistical evidence Salience
- Adler, J. (2002). Belief’s own ethics. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Backes, M. (Forthcoming). Normalcy, justification, and the easy-defeat problem. Philosophical Studies. Available at: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11098-018-1155-y. Accessed 28 Sept 2018.
- Bloom-Tillman, M. (2015). Sensitivity, causality, and statistical evidence in courts of law. Thought, 4, 2.Google Scholar
- Bloom-Tillman, M. (2017). ‘More likely than not’—knowledge first and the role of statistical evidence in courts of law. In A. Carter, E. Gordon, & B. Jarvis (Eds.), Knowledge first. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Bolinger, R. J. (Forthcoming). The rational impermissibility of accepting (some) racial generalizations. Synthese. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-018-1809-5. Accessed 28 Sept 2018.
- Clarke, R. (2013). Belief is credence one (in context). Philosopher’s Imprint, 13, 1–18.Google Scholar
- Cohen, J. (2010). Rationality. In J. Dancy, E. Sosa, & M. Steup (Eds.), A companion to epistemology. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Collins, J. (2006). Lotteries and the close shave principle. In S. Hetherington (Ed.), Aspects of knowing. New York: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
- de Finetti, B. (1990). Theory of probability (Vol. I) (first edition 1974). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Di Bello, M. (Forthcoming). Trial by statistics: Is a high probability of guilt enough to convict? Mind. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzy026.
- Enoch, D., & Fisher, T. (2015). Sense and sensitivity: Epistemic and instrumental approaches to statistical evidence. Stanford Law Review, 67, 557–611.Google Scholar
- Fantl, J., & McGrath, M. (2010). Knowledge in an uncertain world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Feldman, R. (1988). Having evidence. In D. F. Austin (Ed.), Philosophical analysis. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
- Foley, R. (1993). Working without a net. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Hajek, A., & Eriksson, L. (2007). What are degrees of belief? Studia Logica, 86, 2.Google Scholar
- Holton, R. (2014). Intention as a model for belief. In M. Vargas & G. Yaffe (Eds.), Rational and social agency: Essays on the philosophy of Michael Bratman. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Jackson, E. (Forthcominga). Belief and credence: Why the attitude-type matters. Philosophical Studies. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-018-1136-1. Accessed 28 Sept 2018.
- Jackson, E. (Forthcomingb). Belief, credence, and faith. Religious Studies. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0034412518000446. Accessed 28 Sept 2018.
- Jeffrey, R. (1965). The logic of decision. (Second edition 1983). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.Google Scholar
- Kyburg, H. E. (1961). Probability and the logic of rational belief. Middletown: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar
- Lewis, D. (1996). Elusive knowledge. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 74, 4.Google Scholar
- Ramsey, F. (1926). Truth and probability. Reprinted in The foundations of mathematics and other logical essays, ed. R. B. Braithwaite. (1950). London: The Humanities Press.Google Scholar
- Roorda, J. (1995). Revenge of Wolfman: A probabilistic explication of full belief. Available at: https://www.princeton.edu/~bayesway/pu/Wolfman.pdf. Accessed 28 Sept 2018.
- Schauer, F. (2003). Profiles, probabilities, and stereotypes. Cambridge: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
- Schwitzgebel, E. (2015). Belief. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Available at: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/belief/. Accessed 28 Sept 2018.
- Smith, M. (Forthcoming). When does evidence suffice for conviction?. Mind. Available at: https://academic.oup.com/mind/advance-article/doi/10.1093/mind/fzx026/4555414. Accessed 28 Sept 2018.
- Staffel, J. (2017). Accuracy for believers. In Episteme, book symposium on Pettigrew’s accuracy and the laws of credence (Vol. 14(1), pp. 39–48).Google Scholar
- Staffel, J. (Forthcominga). How do beliefs simplify reasoning? Nous. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/nous.12254. Accessed 28 Sept 2018.
- Staffel, J. (Forthcomingb). Attitudes in active reasoning. In M. B. Jackson & B. B. Jackson (Eds.), Reasoning: New essays on theoretical and practical thinking. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Wedgwood, R. (Forthcoming). A probabilistic epistemology of perceptual belief. Philosophical Issues. Available at: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/phis.12130. Accessed 28 Sept 2018.
- Weisberg, J. (Forthcoming). Belief in psyontology. Philosopher’s Imprint. Available at: http://jonathanweisberg.org/pdf/Psyontology.pdf. Accessed 28 Sept 2018.
- Williamson, T. (2000). Knowledge and its limits. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar