Synthese

pp 1–25 | Cite as

On propositions and fineness of grain (again!)

S.I.: Unity of Structured Propositions

Keywords

Truth Condition English Speaker Terminal Node Lexical Item Propositional Attitude 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Caplan, B., & Tillman, C. (2013). Benacerraf’s revenge. Philosophical Studies, 166(1), 111–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chomsky, N. (1996). The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  3. Hanks, P. (2015). Propositional content. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Heim, I., & Kratzer, A. (1998). Semantics in generative grammar. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  5. Kayne, R. (1994). The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  6. Keller, L. J. (2013). The metaphysics of propositional constituency. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 43(5–6), 655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. King, J. C. (1995). Structured propositions and complex predicates. NOUS, 29(4), 516–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. King, J. C. (2007). The nature and structure of content. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. King, J. C. (2009). Questions of unity. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society CIX, 3, 257–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. King, J. C. (2013a). On fineness of grain. Philosophical Studies, 163(3), 763–781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. King, J. C. (2013b). Propositional unity: What’s the problem, who has it and who solves it? Philosophical Studies, 165(1), 71–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. King, J. C., Soames, S., & Speaks, J. (2014). New thinking about propositions. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Merricks, T. (2015). Propositions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Stalnaker, R. (1984). Inquiry. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  15. Stalnaker, R. (2012). Mere possibilities. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyRutgers, The State University of New JerseyNew BrunswickUSA

Personalised recommendations