Advertisement

Synthese

, Volume 193, Issue 8, pp 2659–2684 | Cite as

Why implicit attitudes are (probably) not beliefs

  • Alex Madva
Article

Abstract

Should we understand implicit attitudes on the model of belief? I argue that implicit attitudes are (probably) members of a different psychological kind altogether, because they seem to be insensitive to the logical form of an agent’s thoughts and perceptions. A state is sensitive to logical form only if it is sensitive to the logical constituents of the content of other states (e.g., operators like negation and conditional). I explain sensitivity to logical form and argue that it is a necessary condition for belief. I appeal to two areas of research that seem to show that implicit attitudes fail spectacularly to satisfy this condition—although persistent gaps in the empirical literature leave matters inconclusive. I sketch an alternative account, according to which implicit attitudes are sensitive merely to spatiotemporal relations in thought and perception, i.e., the spatial and temporal orders in which people think, see, or hear things.

Keywords

Logical Form Implementation Intention Implicit Attitude Implicit Bias Explicit Attitude 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This essay was revised during my Mellon Postdoctoral Fellowship at the University of California, Berkeley, and subsequently with institutional support from Vassar College. For insightful comments on earlier drafts or lively debates about the ideas in this paper, I am indebted to Alejandro Arango, Charles Michael Brent, Michael Brownstein, Taylor Carman, Guillermo del Pinal, Andrew Franklin-Hall, Katie Gasdaglis, Bertram Gawronski, Tamar Szabó Gendler, Lydia Goehr, Brian Kim, Patricia Kitcher, Felix Koch, Chloe Layman, Eric Mandelbaum, Christia Mercer, Nate Meyvis, John Morrison, Matthew Moss, Marco Nathan, Andreja Novakovic, Christiana Olfert, Katherine Rickus, David Rosenthal, Michael Seifried, Beau Shaw, Susanna Siegel, Virginia Valian, Anubav Vasudevan, Sebastian Watzl, and several anonymous referees. Thanks also to audiences at Columbia University and the Eastern Division meeting of the American Philosophical Association in Atlanta, December 2012.

References

  1. Agerström, J., & Rooth, D. O. (2011). The role of automatic obesity stereotypes in real hiring discrimination. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(4), 790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Asch, S. E. (1946). Forming impressions of personality. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 41, 259–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baddeley, A. (2007). Working memory, thought, and action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bermúdez, J. L. (2006). Animal reasoning and proto-logic. In S. Hurley & M. Nudds (Eds.), Rational animals? (pp. 127–137). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Briñol, P., Petty, R. E., & McCaslin, M. (2009). Changing attitudes on implicit versus explicit measures: What is the difference (pp. 285–326). Attitudes: Insights from the new implicit measures.Google Scholar
  6. Brownstein, M. (2015). Implicit bias. In: Edward N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2015/entries/implicit-bias/.
  7. Brownstein, M., & Madva, A. (2012a). Ethical automaticity. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 42(1), 67–97.Google Scholar
  8. Brownstein, M., & Madva, A. (2012b). The normativity of automaticity. Mind and Language, 27(4), 410–434.Google Scholar
  9. Calanchini, J., Gonsalkorale, K., Sherman, J. W., & Klauer, K. C. (2013). Counter-prejudicial training reduces activation of biased associations and enhances response monitoring. European Journal of Social Psychology, 43(5), 321–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chapman, J., & Armitage, C. J. (2010). Evidence that boosters augment the long-term impact of implementation intentions on fruit and vegetable intake. Psychology and Health, 25(3), 365–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. De Dreu, C. K., Greer, L. L., Van Kleef, G. A., Shalvi, S., & Handgraaf, M. J. (2011). Oxytocin promotes human ethnocentrism. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108(4), 1262–1266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. De Houwer, J. (2011). Evaluative conditioning: A review of procedure knowledge and mental process theories. In T. R. Schachtman & S. S. Reilly (Eds.), Associative learning and conditioning theory: Human and non-human applications (pp. 399–416). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. De Houwer, J. (2014). A propositional model of implicit evaluations. Social and Personality Compass, 8(7), 342–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Deutsch, R., & Strack, F. (2010). Building blocks of social behavior: Reflective and impulsive processes. In B. Gawronski & B. K. Payne (Eds.), Handbook of implicit social cognition: Measurement, theory, and applications (pp. 62–79). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  15. Devine, P. G., Forscher, P. S., Austin, A. J., & Cox, W. T. (2012). Long-term reduction in implicit race bias: A prejudice habit-breaking intervention. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(6), 1267–1278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Eberl, C., Wiers, R. W., Pawelczack, S., Rinck, M., Becker, E. S., & Lindenmeyer, J. (2013). Approach bias modification in alcohol dependence: Do clinical effects replicate and for whom does it work best? Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 4, 38–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fodor, J. A. (1990). A theory of content and other essays. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  18. Forbes, C. E., & Schmader, T. (2010). Retraining attitudes and stereotypes to affect motivation and cognitive capacity under stereotype threat. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(5), 740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Frankish, K. (Forthcoming). Implicit bias, dual process, and metacognitive motivation. In Brownstein & Saul (Eds.), Implicit Bias & Philosophy: Volume I, Metaphysics and Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Gawronski, B., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2006). Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: An integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change. Psychological Bulletin, 132(5), 692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gawronski, B., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2011). The associative-propositional evaluation model: Theory, evidence, and open questions. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gawronski, B., Deutsch, R., Mbirkou, S., Seibt, B., & Strack, F. (2008). When “Just Say No” is not enough: Affirmation versus negation training and the reduction of automatic stereotype activation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 370–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gendler, T. S. (2008a). Alief and belief. The Journal of Philosophy, 105(10), 634–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gendler, T. S. (2008b). Alief in action (and reaction). Mind and Language, 23(5), 552–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gertler, B. (2011). Self-knowledge and the transparency of belief. In A. Hatzimoysis (Ed.), Self-knowledge. Oxford: Oxford.Google Scholar
  26. Glaser, J., & Knowles, E. (2008). Implicit motivation to control prejudice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 164–172.Google Scholar
  27. Gollwitzer, P. M., & Sheeran, P. (2006). Implementation intentions and goal achievement: A meta-analysis of effects and processes. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 69–119). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  28. Govorun, O., & Payne, B. K. (2006). Ego-depletion and prejudice: Separating automatic and controlled components. Social Cognition, 24(2), 111–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Han, H. A., Czellar, S., Olson, M. A., & Fazio, R. H. (2010). Malleability of attitudes or malleability of the IAT? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(2), 286–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Harman, G. (1970). Deep structure as logical form. Synthese, 21(3–4), 275–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Henley, N. M., Miller, M., & Beazley, J. A. (1995). Syntax, semantics, and sexual violence agency and the passive voice. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 14(1–2), 60–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Horcajo, J., Briñol, P., & Petty, R. E. (2010). Consumer persuasion: Indirect change and implicit balance. Psychology & Marketing, 27(10), 938–963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Huebner, B. (2009). Trouble with stereotypes for Spinozan minds. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 39, 63–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Huebner, B. (Forthcoming). Implicit bias, reinforcement learning, and scaffolded moral cognition. In Brownstein & Saul (Eds.), Implicit bias & philosophy: Volume I, metaphysics and epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Hunter, D. (2011). Alienated belief. Dialectica, 65(2), 221–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Karg, B., & Young, J. K. (2009). 101 secrets of the Freemason: The truth behind the world’s most secret society. Avon, MA: Adams Media.Google Scholar
  37. Kawakami, K., Dovidio, J. F., Moll, J., Hermsen, S., & Russin, A. (2000). Just say no (to stereotyping): Effects of training in the negation of stereotypic associations on stereotype activation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 871–888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kawakami, K., Dovidio, J. F., & van Kamp, S. (2007a). The impact of counterstereotypic training and related correction processes on the application of stereotypes. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 10(2), 139–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kawakami, K., Phills, C. E., Steele, J. R., & Dovidio, J. F. (2007b). (Close) distance makes the heart grow fonder: Improving implicit racial attitudes and interracial interactions through approach behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(6), 957–971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kolodny, N. (2005). Why be rational? Mind, 114, 509–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kwong, J. M. C. (2012). Resisting aliefs: Gendler on alief-discordant behaviors. Philosophical Psychology, 25(1), 77–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lepore, E., & Ludwig, K. (2002). What is logical form? Logical Form and Language, 54, 90.Google Scholar
  43. Leslie, S. (Forthcoming). The original sin of cognition: Fear, prejudice, and generalization. The Journal of Philosophy.Google Scholar
  44. Levy, N. (2014a). Consciousness, implicit attitudes, and moral responsibility. Noûs, 48(1), 21–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Levy, N. (2014b). Neither fish nor fowl: Implicit attitudes as patchy endorsements. Noûs. doi: 10.1111/nous.12074.
  46. Lowery, B. S., Hardin, C. D., & Sinclair, S. (2001). Social influence effects on automatic racial prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(5), 842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Madva, A. (2012). The hidden mechanisms of prejudice: Implicit bias and interpersonal fluency. PhD dissertation, Columbia University.Google Scholar
  48. Madva, A. (Forthcoming). Virtue, social Knowledge, and implicit bias. In Brownstein & Saul (Eds.), Implicit Bias & Philosophy: Volume I, Metaphysics and Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Madva, A., & Brownstein, M. (under review). The blurry boundary between stereotyping and evaluation in implicit cognition.Google Scholar
  50. Mandelbaum, E. (2013). Against alief. Philosophical Studies, 165(1), 197–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Mandelbaum, E. (2014). Attitude. Inference, association: On the propositional structure of implicit bias. Noûs. doi: 10.1111/nous.12089.
  52. Mendoza, S. A., Gollwitzer, P. M., & Amodio, D. M. (2010). Reducing the expression of implicit stereotypes: Reflexive control through implementation intentions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(4), 512–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Mitchell, C. J., De Houwer, J., & Lovibond, P. F. (2009). The propositional nature of human associative learning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32(02), 183–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Moran, T., & Bar-Anan, Y. (2013). The effect of object–valence relations on automatic evaluation. Cognition & Emotion, 27(4), 743–752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Pearson, A. R., Dovidio, J. F., & Gaertner, S. L. (2009). The nature of contemporary prejudice: Insights from aversive racism. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 3, 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Rooth, D. O. (2010). Automatic associations and discrimination in hiring: Real world evidence. Labour Economics, 17(3), 523–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Rowbottom, D. P. (2007). ‘In-between believing’ and degrees of belief. Teorema, 26, 131–137.Google Scholar
  58. Rydell, R. J., McConnell, A. R., Mackie, D. M., & Strain, L. M. (2006). Of two minds: Forming and changing valence-inconsistent implicit and explicit attitudes. Psychological Science, 17(11), 954–958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Rydell, R. J., McConnell, A. R., Strain, L. M., Claypool, H. M., & Hugenberg, K. (2007). Implicit and explicit attitudes respond differently to increasing amounts of counterattitudinal information. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37(5), 867–878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Schwitzgebel, E. (2010). Acting contrary to our professed beliefs, or the gulf between occurrent judgment and dispositional belief. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 91, 531–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Sherman, S. J., Rose, J. S., Koch, K., Presson, C. C., & Chassin, L. (2003). Implicit and explicit attitudes toward cigarette smoking: The effects of context and motivation. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 22(1), 13–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Smith, C. T., & De Houwer, J. (2014). The impact of persuasive messages on IAT performance is moderated by source attractiveness and likeability. Social Psychology, 45(6), 437–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Sommers, F. (2009). Dissonant beliefs. Analysis, 69(2), 267–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Stanley, J. (2000). Context and logical form. Linguistics and Philosophy, 23(4), 391–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Terbeck, S., Kahane, G., McTavish, S., Savulescu, J., Cowen, P. J., & Hewstone, M. (2012). Propranolol reduces implicit negative racial bias. Psychopharmacology, 222(3), 419–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Walther, E., Weil, R., & Düsing, J. (2011). The role of evaluative conditioning in attitude formation. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(3), 192–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Webb, T. L., & Sheeran, P. (2008). Mechanisms of implementation intention effects: The role of goal intentions, self-efficacy, and accessibility of plan components. British Journal of Social Psychology, 47, 373–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Webb, T. L., Sheeran, P., & Pepper, J. (2012). Gaining control over responses to implicit attitude tests: Implementation intentions engender fast responses on attitude-incongruent trials. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51(1), 13–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Webber, J. (Forthcoming). Habituation and first-person authority. In R. Altshuler & M. Sigrist (Eds.), Time and the philosophy of action. Routledge.Google Scholar
  70. Wiers, R. W., Eberl, C., Rinck, M., Becker, E. S., & Lindenmeyer, J. (2011). Retraining automatic action tendencies changes alcoholic patients’ approach bias for alcohol and improves treatment outcome. Psychological Science, 22(4), 490–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Zanon, R., De Houwer, J., Gast, A., & Smith, C. T. (2014). When does relational information influence evaluative conditioning? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67(11), 2105–2122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Zimmerman, A. (2007). The nature of belief. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 14(11), 61–82.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Vassar CollegePoughkeepsieUSA

Personalised recommendations