Is the quantum state part of the furniture of the world? Einstein found such a position indigestible, but here I present a different understanding of the wavefunction that is easy to stomach. First, I develop the idea that the wavefunction is nomological in nature, showing how the quantum It or Bit debate gets subsumed by the corresponding It or Bit debate about laws of nature. Second, I motivate the nomological view by casting quantum mechanics in a “classical” formalism (Hamilton–Jacobi theory) and classical mechanics in a “quantum” formalism (Koopman–von Neumann theory) and then comparing and contrasting classical and quantum wave functions. I argue that Humeans about laws can treat classical and quantum wave functions on a par and that doing so yields many benefits.
KeywordsQuantum mechanics Hamilton–Jacobi Koopman Humean Nomological Law of nature Classical wavefunction
- Brumer, P., & Gong, J. (2006). Born rule in quantum and classical mechanics. Physical Review A, 73(5).Google Scholar
- Callender, C., & Weingard, R. (1994). A Bohmian model of quantum cosmology. Philosophy of Science, 1, S228–S237.Google Scholar
- Callender, C., & Weingard, R. (1997). Trouble in paradise? Problems for Bohm’s theory. The monist, 80(1), 24–43.Google Scholar
- Carroll, J. (2012). Laws of nature. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Spring 2012 edition). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2012/entries/laws-of-nature/.
- Dowker, F., & Henson, J. 2004. Spontaneous collapse models on a lattice. Journal of Statistical Physics, 115, 1327–1339.Google Scholar
- Dürr, D., Goldstein, S., & Zanghì, N. (1997). Bohmian mechanics and the meaning of the wave function. In R. S. Cohen, M. Horne, & J. Stachel (Eds.), Experimental metaphysics—quantum mechanical studies for Abner Shimony; Boston studies in the philosophy of science 193 (pp. 25–38). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
- Esfeld, M., Lazarovici, D., Hubert, M., & Dürr, D. (2013). The ontology of Bohmian mechanics. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.Google Scholar
- Goldstein, S., & Teufel, S. (2001). Quantum spacetime without observers: Ontological clarity and the conceptual foundations of quantum gravity. In C. Callender & S. Teufel (Eds.), Physics meets philosophy at the Planck scale (pp. 275–289). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hall, N. Humean reductionism about laws of nature. Unpublished MS. http://philpapers.org/rec/HALHRA.
- Hardy, L. (2012). Are quantum states real? arxiv.org/pdf/1205.1439.
- Howard, D. (1990). ‘Nicht Sein Kann Was Nicht Sein Darf’, or the prehistory of EPR, 1909–1935: Einstein’s early worries about the quantum mechanics of composite systems. In A. I. Miller (Ed.), Sixty-two years of uncertainty. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
- Jauslin, H. R., & Sugny, D. (2009). Dynamics of mixed classical-quantum systems, geometric quantization and coherent states (Review Vol.). Lecture Note Series. IMS, NUS, Singapore.Google Scholar
- Leifer, M. (2011) Can the quantum state be interpreted statistically? Web log post. http://mattleifer.info/2011/11/20/can-the-quantum-state-be-interpreted-statistically/.
- Lewis, P. (2007b). How Bohm’s theory solves the measurement problem. Philosophy of Science, 74, 749–760.Google Scholar
- Mauro, D. (2002). Topics in Koopman–von Neumann theory. PhD thesis, Università degli Studi di Trieste. arXiv:quant-ph/0301172 [quant-ph].
- Miller, E. (2013). Quantum entanglement, bohmian mechanics, and humean supervenience. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 92, 1–17.Google Scholar
- Poirier, W. (2010). Bohmian mechanics without pilot waves. In B. Poirier (Eds.), Dynamics of molecular systems, from quantum to classical dynamics. Chemical Physics, 370(1–3), 4–14.Google Scholar
- Smolin, L. (2013). Time reborn. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar
- Squires, E. (1994). Some comments on the de Broglie–Bohm picture by an admiring spectator. In A. van der Merwe & A. Garuccio (Eds.), Waves and particles in light and matter. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
- Valentini, A. (2012). De Broglie–Bohm pilot-wave theory: Many worlds in denial? In S. W. Saunders, et al. (Eds.), Many worlds? Everett, quantum theory and reality (pp. 476–509). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Wallace, D. (2008). Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics. In D. Rickles (Ed.), The Ashgate companion to contemporary philosophy of physics. Aldershot: Ashgate Press.Google Scholar