Synthese

, Volume 191, Issue 14, pp 3447–3467 | Cite as

Information is intrinsically semantic but alethically neutral

Article

Abstract

In this paper I argue that, according to a particular physicalist conception of information, information is both alethically neutral or non-alethic, and is intrinsically semantic. The conception of information presented is physicalist and reductionist, and is contrary to most current pluralist and non-reductionist philosophical opinion about the nature of information. The ontology assumed for this conception of information is based upon physicalist non-eliminative ontic structural realism. However, the argument of primary interest is that information so construed is intrinsically semantic on a reductionist and non-alethic basis where semantic content is constituted by indication along causal pathways. Similar arguments have been presented by philosophers with respect to representation. I suggest the conception of information that I present is correct by the lights of the best applied mathematical and scientific theories of information. If so, there is no need for any separate theory of semantic information. Thus I present a theory of intrinsically semantic information which also constitutes an informational theory of truth where truth reduces to information. In the last section I discuss weakly and strongly semantic information, and reject them in favour of alethically neutral intrinsically semantic information.

Keywords

Information The philosophy of information Information theory Informational semantics Semantics Metaphysics Shannon Floridi Kolmogorov Semantic theories of information Weakly semantic information  Strongly semantic information 

References

  1. Adriaans, P. (2010). A critical analysis of Floridi’s theory of semantic information. Knowledge, Technology & Policy, 23, 41–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Carnap, R. (1936). Testability and meaning. Philosophy of Science, 3, 419–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Carnap, R. (1945). Two concepts of probability: The problem of probability. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 5, 513–532.Google Scholar
  4. Carnap, R. (1950). Empiricism, semantics and ontology. Revue Internationale de Philosophie, 4, 20–40. Retrieved from http://www.ditext.oom/carnap/carnap.html.
  5. Carnap, R., & Bar-Hillel, Y. (1952). An outline of a theory of semantic information. Technical Report, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
  6. Carnap, R., & Bar-Hillel, Y. (1953). Semantic information. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 4(14), 147–157.Google Scholar
  7. Chalmers, D. J. (1996). The conscious mind: A search for a fundamental theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Devlin, K. (1995). Logic and information. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Di Vincenzo, D. P., & Loss, D. (1998). Quantum information is physical. Superlattices and Microstructures, 23, 419–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dretske, F. I. (1981). Knowledge and the flow of information. London: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  11. Dretske, F. I. (1988). Explaining behaviour: Reasons in a world of causes. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press/Bradford Books.Google Scholar
  12. Dretske, F. I. (1993). Misrepresentation. In A. I. Goldman (Ed.), Readings in philosophy and cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press. (Original paper 1986).Google Scholar
  13. Dretske, F. I. (2008). Epistemology and information. In P. Adriaans & J. V. Benthem (Eds.), The philosophy of information. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  14. Floridi, L. (2004a). Information. In L. Floridi (Ed.), The Blackwell guide to the philosophy of computing and information (pp. 40–61). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  15. Floridi, L. (2004b). Outline of a theory of strongly semantic information. Mind and Machines, 14(2), 197–221.Google Scholar
  16. Floridi, L. (2005). Is semantic information meaningful data? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 70(2), 351–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Floridi, L. (2008). A defence of informational structural realism. Synthese, 161(2), 219–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Floridi, L. (2010). Semantic information and the correctness theory of truth. Erkenntnis, 74, 147–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Floridi, L. (2011). The philosophy of information. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. French, S., & Ladyman, J. (2003). The dissolution of objects: Between platonism and phenomenalism. Synthese, 136(1), 73–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gray, R. M. (2013). Entropy and information theory (1st ed., 1990). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  22. Grice, H. P. (1957). The philosophical review, vol. 66 (pp. 377–388). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  23. Godfrey-Smith, P. (1989). Misinformation. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 19(4), 533–550.Google Scholar
  24. Godfrey-Smith, P. (1992). Indication and adaptation. Synthese, 92(2), 283–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jackson, F. (1998). From metaphysics to ethics: A defence of conceptual analysis. Oxford: Oxford Scholarship, Online, 2003.Google Scholar
  26. Kåhre, J. (2002). The mathematical theory of information. Massachusetts: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  27. Ladyman, J., & Ross, D. (2003). Remodelling structural realism: Quantum physics and the metaphysics of structure. Synthese, 136(1), 31–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Landauer, R. (1996). The physical nature of information. Physics Letters A, 92(2), 188–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Landauer, R. (1999). Information is a physical entity. Physica, 92(2), 63–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Long, B. R. (2013). Physicalist-reductionist ontic structural realism about information with applications. PhD Thesis - submitting 2013–2014.Google Scholar
  31. Quine, W. V. (1948). On what there is. Review of Metaphysics, II(5), 217–234.Google Scholar
  32. Sarkar, S. (2005). How genes encode information for phenotypic traits. In S. Sarkar (Ed.), Molecular models of life: Philosophical papers on molecular biology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  33. Shannon, C. E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. Reprinted with corrections from The Bell System Technical Journal. Technical Report, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (50th anniversary release of 1948 paper) Retrieved on line from Bell Labs.Google Scholar
  34. Shea, N. (2007). Representation in the genome and in other inheritance systems. Biology and Philosophy, 22, 313–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Stampe, D. (1986). Verificationism and a causal account of meaning. Synthese, 69, 113–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Taylor, K. A. (1987). Belief, information, and semantic content: A naturalist’s lament. Synthese, 71, 97–124.Google Scholar
  37. Weaver, W. (1949) Recent contributions to the mathematical theory of communication. Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 1998 reprint.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Department of PhilosophyThe University of SydneySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations