, Volume 192, Issue 7, pp 2053–2076 | Cite as

Formal statement of the special principle of relativity

  • Márton Gömöri
  • László E. SzabóEmail author


While there is a longstanding discussion about the interpretation of the extended, general principle of relativity, there seems to be a consensus that the special principle of relativity is absolutely clear and unproblematic. However, a closer look at the literature on relativistic physics reveals a more confusing picture. There is a huge variety of, sometimes metaphoric, formulations of the relativity principle, and there are different, sometimes controversial, views on its actual content. The aim of this paper is to develop a precise language in order to provide a precise formulation of the principle. In view of the fact that the special relativity principle is considered as a universal meta-law, which must be valid for all physical laws in all situations, we try to keep the formalism as general as possible. The benefit of the formal reconstruction is that it makes explicit all the necessary conceptual components of the principle; it brings out many subtle details and the related conceptual problems.


The special relativity principle Operationalism Covariance 



The research was partly supported by the OTKA Foundation, No. K100715.


  1. Bell, J. S. (1987). How to teach special relativity. Speakable and unspeakable in quantum mechanics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bohm, D. (1996). Special theory of relativity. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Brading, K., & Brown, H. R. (2004). Are gauge symmetry transformations observable? British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 55, 645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brading, K., & Castellani, E. (2008). Symmetry and symmetry breaking. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2008 Edition).
  5. Brown, H. R. (2005). Physical relativity—space–time structure from a dynamical perspective. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Comstock, D. F. (1909). The principle of relativity. Science, 31, 767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dieks, D. (2006). Another look at general covariance and the equivalence of reference frames. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 37, 174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Earman, J. (2004). Laws, symmetry, and symmetry breaking: Invariance, conservation principles, and objectivity. Philosophy of Science, 71, 1227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Einstein, A., et al. (1905). On the electrodynamics of moving bodies. In H. A. Lorentz (Ed.), The principle of relativity: A collection of original memoirs on the special and general theory of relativity. London: Methuen and Company. 1923.Google Scholar
  10. Einstein, A., et al. (1916). The foundations of the general theory of relativity. In H. A. Lorentz (Ed.), The principle of relativity: A collection of original memoirs on the special and general theory of relativity. London: Methuen and Company. 1923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Einstein, A. (1940). The fundaments of theoretical physics. Ideas and opinions (pp. 323–335). New York: Bonanza.Google Scholar
  12. Fock, V. (1964). The theory of space, time and gravitation (2nd Revised Edition). Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  13. Friedman, M. (1983). Foundations of space-time theories. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Georgiou, A. (1969). Special relativity and thermodynamics. Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 66, 423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gömöri, M., & Szabó, L. E. (2011). How to move an electromagnetic field?
  16. Gömöri, M., & Szabó, L. E. (2013). Operational understanding of the covariance of classical electrodynamics. Physics Essays, 26, 361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Grøn, Ø., & Vøyenli, K. (1999). On the foundation of the principle of relativity. Foundations of Physics, 29, 1695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Houtappel, R. M. F., Van Dam, H., & Wigner, E. P. (1965). The conceptual basis and use of the geometric invariance principles. Reviews of Modern Physics, 37, 595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jackson, J. D. (1999). Classical Electrodynamics (3rd ed.). Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
  20. Jánossy, L. (1971). Theory of relativity based on physical reality. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
  21. Madarász, J. X. (2002). Logic and relativity (in the light of definability theory). PhD thesis, Eötvös University, Budapest.
  22. Møller, C. (1955). The theory of relativity. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  23. Norton, J. D. (1988). Coordinates and covariance: Einstein’s view of spacetime and the modern view. Foundations of Physics, 19, 1215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Norton, J. D. (1993). General covariance and the foundations of general relativity: Eight decades of dispute. Reports on Progress in Physics, 56, 791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Norton, J. D. (2013). Special theory of relativity: The principles.
  26. Poincaré, H. (1956). The principles of mathematical physics. The Scientific Monthly, 82, 165.Google Scholar
  27. Rindler, W. (2006). Relativity: special, general, and cosmological (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Rovelli, C. (2004). Quantum gravity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Sections 2.2-2.3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sardesai, P. L. (2004). A primer of special relativity. New Delhi: New Age International.Google Scholar
  30. Schlick, M. (1920). Space and time in contemporary physics: An introduction to the theory of relativity and gravitation. New York: Oxford University Press. (republished: Mineola, Dower Publications, Inc., 2005).Google Scholar
  31. Sewell, G. L. (2008). On the question of temperature transformations under Lorentz and Galilei boosts. Journal of Physics A, 41, 382003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Szabó, L. E. (2004). On the meaning of Lorentz covariance. Foundations of Physics Letters, 17, 479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tolman, R. C. (1917). The theory of relativity of motion. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  34. Tolman, R. C. (1949). Relativity, thermodynamics and cosmology. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  35. Westman, H., & Sonego, S. (2009). Coordinates, observables and symmetry in relativity. Annals of Physics, 324, 1585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Zimmerman Jones, A., & Robbins, D. (2009). String Theory For Dummies. Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Logic, Institute of PhilosophyEötvös UniversityBudapest Hungary

Personalised recommendations