Formal statement of the special principle of relativity
- 193 Downloads
While there is a longstanding discussion about the interpretation of the extended, general principle of relativity, there seems to be a consensus that the special principle of relativity is absolutely clear and unproblematic. However, a closer look at the literature on relativistic physics reveals a more confusing picture. There is a huge variety of, sometimes metaphoric, formulations of the relativity principle, and there are different, sometimes controversial, views on its actual content. The aim of this paper is to develop a precise language in order to provide a precise formulation of the principle. In view of the fact that the special relativity principle is considered as a universal meta-law, which must be valid for all physical laws in all situations, we try to keep the formalism as general as possible. The benefit of the formal reconstruction is that it makes explicit all the necessary conceptual components of the principle; it brings out many subtle details and the related conceptual problems.
KeywordsThe special relativity principle Operationalism Covariance
The research was partly supported by the OTKA Foundation, No. K100715.
- Bell, J. S. (1987). How to teach special relativity. Speakable and unspeakable in quantum mechanics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Bohm, D. (1996). Special theory of relativity. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Brading, K., & Castellani, E. (2008). Symmetry and symmetry breaking. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2008 Edition). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2008/entries/symmetry-breaking.
- Einstein, A., et al. (1905). On the electrodynamics of moving bodies. In H. A. Lorentz (Ed.), The principle of relativity: A collection of original memoirs on the special and general theory of relativity. London: Methuen and Company. 1923.Google Scholar
- Einstein, A. (1940). The fundaments of theoretical physics. Ideas and opinions (pp. 323–335). New York: Bonanza.Google Scholar
- Fock, V. (1964). The theory of space, time and gravitation (2nd Revised Edition). Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
- Friedman, M. (1983). Foundations of space-time theories. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Gömöri, M., & Szabó, L. E. (2011). How to move an electromagnetic field? http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/8784.
- Jackson, J. D. (1999). Classical Electrodynamics (3rd ed.). Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Jánossy, L. (1971). Theory of relativity based on physical reality. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
- Madarász, J. X. (2002). Logic and relativity (in the light of definability theory). PhD thesis, Eötvös University, Budapest. http://www.math-inst.hu/pub/algebraic-logic/Contents.html.
- Møller, C. (1955). The theory of relativity. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
- Norton, J. D. (2013). Special theory of relativity: The principles. http://www.pitt.edu/~jdnorton/teaching/HPS_0410/chapters/Special_relativity_principles.
- Poincaré, H. (1956). The principles of mathematical physics. The Scientific Monthly, 82, 165.Google Scholar
- Rindler, W. (2006). Relativity: special, general, and cosmological (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Sardesai, P. L. (2004). A primer of special relativity. New Delhi: New Age International.Google Scholar
- Schlick, M. (1920). Space and time in contemporary physics: An introduction to the theory of relativity and gravitation. New York: Oxford University Press. (republished: Mineola, Dower Publications, Inc., 2005).Google Scholar
- Tolman, R. C. (1917). The theory of relativity of motion. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Tolman, R. C. (1949). Relativity, thermodynamics and cosmology. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
- Zimmerman Jones, A., & Robbins, D. (2009). String Theory For Dummies. Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar