Synthese

, Volume 190, Issue 17, pp 3751–3775 | Cite as

Why reliabilism does not permit easy knowledge

Article

Abstract

Reliabilism furnishes an account of basic knowledge that circumvents the problem of the given. However, reliabilism and other epistemological theories that countenance basic knowledge have been criticized for permitting all-too-easy higher-level knowledge. In this paper, I describe the problem of easy knowledge, look briefly at proposed solutions, and then develop my own. I argue that the easy knowledge problem, as it applies to reliabilism, hinges on a false and too crude understanding of ‘reliable’. With a more plausible conception of ‘reliable’, a simple and elegant solution emerges.

Keywords

Basic knowledge Bootstrapping Easy knowledge problem Higher-order knowledge Reliabilism 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Altschul, J. (2011). Entitlement, justification, and the bootstrapping problem. Acta Analytica, online first, doi: 10.1007/s12136-011-0136-y
  2. Armstrong D. (1973) Belief, truth and knowledge. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Becker K. (2008) Epistemic luck and the generality problem. Philosophical Studies 139(3): 353–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Becker K. (2012) Basic knowledge and easy understanding. Acta Analytica 27(2): 145–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baumann P. (2012) Nozick’s defense of closure. In: Becker K., Black T. (eds) The sensitivity principle in epistemology.. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 11–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Black T. (2008) Solving the problem of easy knowledge. The Philosophical Quarterly 58(233): 597–617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cohen S. (2002) Basic knowledge and the problem of easy knowledge. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research LXV(2): 309–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cohen S. (2005) Why basic knowledge is easy knowledge. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research LXX(2): 417–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Douven, I., & Kelp, C. (2012). Proper bootstrapping, Synthese, online first, doi: 10.1007/s11229-012-0115-x
  10. Dretske F. (1971) Conclusive reasons. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 49(1): 1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Feldman R. (1985) Reliability and justification. The Monist 68: 159–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Goldman A. (1976) Discrimination and perceptual knowledge. Journal of Philosophy 73(20): 771–791CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Goldman A. (1979) What is justified belief?. In: Pappas G. (eds) Justification and knowledge.. D. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp 1–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Greco J. (2000) Putting skeptics in their place. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kornblith H. (2009) A reliabilist solution to the problem of promiscuous bootstrapping. Analysis 69(2): 263–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Markie P. (2005) Easy knowledge. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research LXX(2): 406–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Neta R. (2005) A contextualist solution to the problem of easy knowledge. Grazer Philosophische Studien 69: 183–205Google Scholar
  18. Nozick R. (1981) Philosophical explanations. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  19. Plantinga A. (1993) Warrant and proper function. Oxford University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pritchard D. (2012) Anti-luck virtue epistemology. Journal of Philosophy CIX(3): 247–279Google Scholar
  21. Titelbaum M. (2010) Tell me you love me: Bootstrapping, externalism, and no-lose epistemology. Philosophical Studies 149(1): 119–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Vogel J. (2000) Reliabilism leveled. The Journal of Philosophy 97(11): 602–623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Weisberg J. (2010) Bootstrapping in general. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 81(3): 525–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Williamson T. (2000) Knowledge and its limits. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Philosophy1 University of New MexicoAlbuquerqueUSA

Personalised recommendations