Embedding philosophers in the practices of science: bringing humanities to the sciences
The National Science Foundation (NSF) in the United States, like many other funding agencies all over the globe, has made large investments in interdisciplinary research in the sciences and engineering, arguing that interdisciplinary research is an essential resource for addressing emerging problems, resulting in important social benefits. Using NSF as a case study for problem that might be relevant in other contexts as well, I argue that the NSF itself poses a significant barrier to such research in not sufficiently appreciating the value of the humanities as significant interdisciplinary partners. This essay focuses on the practices of philosophy as a highly valuable but currently under-appreciated partner in achieving the goals of interdisciplinary research. This essay advances a proposal for developing deeper and wider interdisciplinary research in the sciences through coupled ethical-epistemological research. I argue that this more robust model of interdisciplinary practice will lead to better science by providing resources for understanding the types of value decisions that are entrenched in research models and methods, offering resources for identifying the ethical implications of research decisions, and providing a lens for identifying the questions that are ignored, under-examined, and rendered invisible through scientific habit or lack of interest. In this way, we will have better science both in the traditional sense of advancing knowledge by building on and adding to our current knowledge as well as in the broader sense of science for the good of, namely, scientific research that better benefits society.
KeywordsPhilosophy Interdisciplinarity Coupled ethical-epistemic analyses Climate science NSF Broader-impacts criterion
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Collins, J. (2010). HPL-Based ethics education for life science and bioengineering students. NSF Grant 0933812 Award Abstract.Google Scholar
- Frodeman R., Mitcham C., Sacks A. B. (2001) Questioning interdisciplinarity. Science, Technology, and Society Newsletter 126–127: 1–5Google Scholar
- Graybill J. K., Dooling S., Shandas V., Withey J., Greve A., Simon G. L. (2006) A rough guide to interdisciplinarity: Graduate student perspectives. Professional Biologist 56(9): 757–763Google Scholar
- Harding S. (2002) Rethinking standpoint epistemology: What is “Strong Objectivity”?. In: Wray K. B. (eds) Knowledge and inquiry: Readings in epistemology. Broadview Press, New York, pp 352–384Google Scholar
- Klein J. T. (1990) Interdisciplinarity: History, theory and practice. Wayne State University Press, Detroit, MIGoogle Scholar
- Klein J. T. (1996) Crossing boundaries: Knowledge, disciplinarities, and interdisciplinarities. The University of Virginia Press, Charlottesville, VAGoogle Scholar
- Klein J. T. (2000) Transdisciplinarity: Joint problem solving among science, technology and society: An effective way for managing complexity. Birkhauser, BaselGoogle Scholar
- Mann M. E., Kump L. R. (2008) Dire predictions: Understanding global warming. DK Publishing, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Meehl, G. A. (2007). Global climate projections. In S. Solomon, D. Qin, M. Manning, Z. Chen, M. Marquis, K. B. Averyt, M. Tignor, & H. L. Miller (Eds.), Climate Change 2007: The physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK and New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Morgan M. G., Ricke K. (2011) Cooling the earth through solar radiation management: The need for research and an approach to its governance. International Risk Governance Council, GenevaGoogle Scholar
- National Institutes of Health. (2011). Research teams of the future. Retrieved from https://commonfund.nih.gov/researchteams.
- National Science Foundation. (2010). Decadal and regional climate prediction using earth systems models (EaSM). Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/funding/pgm_summ.jsp?pims_id=503399.
- National Science Foundation. (2011a). Fostering interdisciplinary research in education. Program Solicitation NSF 11-526. Retrieved from http://nsf.gov/funding/pgm_summ.jsp?pims_id=503479.
- National Science Foundation. (2011b). Interdisciplinary research. Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/od/oia/additional_resources/interdisciplinary_research/index.jsp.
- Proctor R., Schiebinger L. (2008) Agnotology: The making and unmaking of ignorance. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
- Ricke, K. L., Morgan, M. G., & Allen, M. R. (2010). Regional climate response to solar-radiation management. Nature Geoscience. doi:10.1038/ngeo915.
- Robock, A., Oman, L., & Stenchikov, G. L. (2008). Regional climate responses to geoengineering with tropical SO2 injections. Journal of Geophysical Research–Atmospheres, 113(D16), 15.Google Scholar
- Shepherd J., Caldeira K., Cox P., Haigh J. et al (2009) Geoengineering the climate: Science, governance and uncertainty. The Royal Society, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Svoboda T., Keller K., Goes M., Tuana N. (2011) Sulfate aerosol geoengineering: The question of justice. Public Affairs Quarterly 25(3): 157–180Google Scholar
- Urban N. M., Keller K. (2010) Probabilistic hindcasts and projections of the coupled climate, carbon cycle and Atlantic meridional overturning circulation system: A Bayesian fusion of century-scale observations with a simple model. Tellus Series A: Dynamic Meteorology and Oceanography 62(5): 737–750Google Scholar
- United States Congress. (2007). American creating opportunities to meaningfully promote excellence in technology, education, and science act. America COMPETES Act.Google Scholar
- van Hartesveldt, C., & Giordan, J. (2008). Impact on academic institutions of transformative interdisciplinary research and graduate education. National Science Foundation. http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2009/nsf0933/igert_workshop08.pdf
- Wilson G. (2009) The world has problems while universities have disciplines: Universities meeting the challenge of environment through interdisciplinary partnerships. Journal of the World Universities Forum 2(2): 57–62Google Scholar