Causality, emergence, computation and unreasonable expectations
- 156 Downloads
I argue that much of current concern with the role of causality and strong emergence in natural processes is based upon an unreasonable expectation placed on our ability to formalize scientific knowledge. In most disciplines our formalization ability is an expectation rather than a scientific result. This calls for an empirical approach to the study of causation and emergence. Finally, I suggest that for advances in complexity research to occur, attention needs to be paid to understanding what role computation plays in this experimental approach.
KeywordsCausation Emergence Computation Numerical modelling
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Boschetti F., Gray R. (2007) Emergence and computability. Emergence: Complexity and Organization 9: 120–130Google Scholar
- Boschetti F., Gray R. (2007) A Turing test for Emergence. In: Prokopenko M. (Ed.), Advances in applied self-organizing systems. Springer-Verlag, London, pp 349–364Google Scholar
- Chaitin G. (1997) The limits of mathematics: A course on information theory & limits of formal reasoning. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Pattee H. (1997) Causation, control, and the evolution of complexity. In: Andersen P. B., Emmeche C., Finnemann N. O., Christiansen P. V. (Eds.), Downward causation. University of Århus Press, Århus, pp 322–348Google Scholar
- Pearl J. (2003) Statistics and causal inference: A review. Test Journal 12(281): 345Google Scholar
- Rosen, R. (2001). Life itself: A comprehensive inquiry into the nature, origin, and fabrication of life. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
- Shalizi C. (2001) Causal architecture, complexity and self-organization in time series and cellular automata. Santa Fe Institute, Santa FeGoogle Scholar