, Volume 186, Issue 1, pp 55–102

The twofold role of diagrams in Euclid’s plane geometry


DOI: 10.1007/s11229-012-0074-2

Cite this article as:
Panza, M. Synthese (2012) 186: 55. doi:10.1007/s11229-012-0074-2


Proposition I.1 is, by far, the most popular example used to justify the thesis that many of Euclid’s geometric arguments are diagram-based. Many scholars have recently articulated this thesis in different ways and argued for it. My purpose is to reformulate it in a quite general way, by describing what I take to be the twofold role that diagrams play in Euclid’s plane geometry (EPG). Euclid’s arguments are object-dependent. They are about geometric objects. Hence, they cannot be diagram-based unless diagrams are supposed to have an appropriate relation with these objects. I take this relation to be a quite peculiar sort of representation. Its peculiarity depends on the two following claims that I shall argue for: (i) The identity conditions of EPG objects are provided by the identity conditions of the diagrams that represent them; (ii) EPG objects inherit some properties and relations from these diagrams.


Euclid Plane geometry Diagrams 

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CNRS, IHPST (UMR 8590 of CNRS, University of Paris 1, and ENS Paris)ParisFrance

Personalised recommendations