I use recent work on Kant and diagrammatic reasoning to develop a reconsideration of central aspects of Kant’s philosophy of geometry and its relation to spatial intuition. In particular, I reconsider in this light the relations between geometrical concepts and their schemata, and the relationship between pure and empirical intuition. I argue that diagrammatic interpretations of Kant’s theory of geometrical intuition can, at best, capture only part of what Kant’s conception involves and that, for example, they cannot explain why Kant takes geometrical constructions in the style of Euclid to provide us with an a priori framework for physical space. I attempt, along the way, to shed new light on the relationship between Kant’s theory of space and the debate between Newton and Leibniz to which he was reacting, and also on the role of geometry and spatial intuition in the transcendental deduction of the categories.
KeywordsGeometry Diagrammatic reasoning Space Intuition Schematism Transcendental deduction
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Allison H. E. (1973) The Kant-Eberhard controversy. John Hopkins University Press, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
- Allison H. E. (1983) Kant’s transcendental idealism. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
- Carson E. (1997) Kant on intuition in geometry. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 27: 489–512Google Scholar
- De Pierris G. (2001) Geometry in the metaphysical exposition. In: Gerhardt V., Horstmann R.-P., Schumacher R. (eds) Kant und die Berliner Aufklärung, Band 2. de Gruyter, Berlin, pp 197–204Google Scholar
- Friedman M. (1992) Kant and the exact sciences. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Friedman M. (2005) Kant on science and experience. In: Mercer C., O’Neill E. (eds) Early modern philosophy: Mind, matter, and metaphysics. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 262–275Google Scholar
- Friedman M. (2009) Newton and Kant on absolute apace: From theology to transcendental philosophy. In: Bitbol M., Kerszberg P., Petitot J. (eds) Constituting objectivity: Transcendental perspectives on modern physics. Springer, Berlin, pp 35–50Google Scholar
- Kant, I. (1902-). Kant’s gesammelte Schriften. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
- Newton I. (2004). Isaac Newton: Philosophical writings. In Janiak A. (Ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Shabel L. (2003) Mathematics in Kant’s critical philosophy: Reflections on mathematical practice. New York and London, RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
- Sutherland D. (2004) The role of magnitude in Kant’s critical philosophy. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 34: 411–442Google Scholar
- Tarski A. (1959) What is elementary geometry?. In: Henkin L., Suppes P., Tarski A. (eds) The Axiomatic method, with special reference to geometry and physics. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 16–29Google Scholar