Synthese

, Volume 188, Issue 3, pp 423–448 | Cite as

The logic of obligation and the obligations of the logician

Article
  • 191 Downloads

Keywords

Obligation Deontic logic modal logic Hintikka’s rule 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bennett J. (1955) Iterated modalities. The Philosophical Quarterly 5(18): 45–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bocheński I., (1948). On the categorical syllogism. Dominican Studies, I, 35–57.Google Scholar
  3. Bocheński, I. (1949). Précis de Logique Mathématique. Bussum, Netherlands: F.G. Kroonder.Google Scholar
  4. Church A. (1940) Review: M. Lazerowitz, self-contradictory propositions. Journal of Symbolic Logic 5: 81–82Google Scholar
  5. Feys R. (1950) Les systèmes formalisés des modalités aristotéliciennes. Revue Philosophique de Louvain 48: 478–509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Henle P. (1937) Review: Morris Lazerowitz, tautologies and the matrix method. Journal of Symbolic Logic 2: 141–142Google Scholar
  7. Lejewski C. (1954) Logic and existence. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 5: 104–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Łukasiewicz J. (1948) The shortest axiom of the implicational calculus of propositions. Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy 52 A: 25–33Google Scholar
  9. Łukasiewicz J. (1951) Aristotle’s syllogistic from the standpoint of modern formal logic. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  10. Łukasiewicz, J. (1951b). On variable functions of propositional arguments. Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy, Section A: Mathematical and Physical Sciences, Vol. 54, (1951/1952), pp. 25–35.Google Scholar
  11. Łukasiewicz, J. (1953a). The principle of individuation. Aristotelian Society Supplementary, 27, 77 ff.Google Scholar
  12. Łukasiewicz J. (1953b) A system of modal logic. Journal of Computing Systems 1: 111–149Google Scholar
  13. Melville H. (1851) Moby Dick. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  14. Meredith C. (1951) On an extended system of propositional calculus. Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy 54: 37–47Google Scholar
  15. Nagel E. (1944) Review: Alice Ambrose, self-contradictory suppositions. Journal of Symbolic Logic 9: 46–47Google Scholar
  16. Peirce, C. (1933). In C. Hartshorne & P. Weiss (Eds.), Collected Papers (Vol. 4). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Prior A. (1955a) English and ontology. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 6: 64–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Prior A. (1955b) Formal logic. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  19. Prior A. (1956) Modality and quantification in S5. The Journal of Symbolic Logic 21: 60–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Prior A. (1962) Formal logic (2nd ed.). Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  21. Sobociński B. (1949a) ‘L’Analyse de l’Antinomie Russellienne par Leśniewski’. Methodos 1: 99–104Google Scholar
  22. Sobociński B. (1949b) ‘L’Analyse de l’Antinomie Russellienne par Leśniewski’. Methodos 1: 220–228Google Scholar
  23. Sobociński B. (1949c) ‘L’Analyse de l’Antinomie Russellienne par Leśniewski’. Methodos 1: 308–316Google Scholar
  24. Sobociński B. (1950) ‘L’Analyse de l’Antinomie Russellienne par Leśniewski’. Methodos 2: 237–257Google Scholar
  25. Sobociński B. (1953) On a modal system of Feys-von Wright. Journal of Computing Systems 1: 171–178Google Scholar
  26. Suszko R. (1948) Review: Jerzy Slupecki, Uwagi o Sylogistyce Arystotelesa (Les Remarques sur la Syllogistique d’Aristote). Journal of Symbolic Logic 13: 166Google Scholar
  27. Thomas I. (1951) Farrago Logica. Dominican Studies 4: 69–79Google Scholar
  28. von Wright G. (1951) An essay in modal logic. North-Holland Publishing Company, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Prior Project, c/o Peter Øhrstrøm, Aalborg UniversityAalborg EastDenmark

Personalised recommendations