In “Epistemic Permissiveness”, Roger White presents several arguments against Extreme Permissivism, the view that there are possible cases where, given one’s total evidence, it would be rational to either believe P, or to believe ∼P. In this paper, we carefully reconstruct White’s arguments and then argue that they do not succeed.
KeywordsEpistemology Rationality Permissiveness Uniqueness Roger White
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- BonJour L. (1985) The structure of empirical knowledge. MA: Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Harman, G. (1999). Tought. In Reasoning, meaning, and mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- White R. (2005) Epistemic permissiveness. Philosophical Issues 15: 445–459Google Scholar