On Reflective Knowledge: replies to Battaly and Reed
This article is a reply to Baron Reed and Heather Battaly, two critics in a book symposium on my Reflective Knowledge. The reply to Reed concerns the main content and structure of Descartes’s epistemology. The reply to Battaly concerns how best to deal with epistemic circularity.
KeywordsDescartes Epistemic circularity Reflective knowledge The Cartesian Circle
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Descartes, R. (1984). The philosophical writings of Descartes (Vol. II) (J. Cottingham, R. Stoothoff, & D. Murdoch, Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Sosa, E. (2011a). Descartes and virtue epistemology. In K. Clark & M. Rea (Eds.), Science, religion, and metaphysics. Oxford: Oxford University Press (forthcoming).Google Scholar
- Sosa, E. (2011b). Descartes’s epistemology. In D. Dodd, C. Wright, & E. Zardini (Eds.), Contemporary perspectives on perceptual justification and skepticism. Oxford: Oxford University Press (forthcoming).Google Scholar