Synthese

, Volume 187, Issue 3, pp 957–971

From constants to consequence, and back

Article

Abstract

Bolzano’s definition of consequence in effect associates with each set X of symbols (in a given interpreted language) a consequence relation \({\Rightarrow_X}\) . We present this in a precise and abstract form, in particular studying minimal sets of symbols generating \({\Rightarrow_X}\) . Then we present a method for going in the other direction: extracting from an arbitrary consequence relation \({\Rightarrow}\) its associated set \({C_\Rightarrow}\) of constants. We show that this returns the expected logical constants from familiar consequence relations, and that, restricting attention to sets of symbols satisfying a strong minimality condition, there is an isomorphism between the set of strongly minimal sets of symbols and the set of corresponding consequence relations (both ordered under inclusion).

Keywords

Logical constants Consequence relations Bolzano consequence 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aczel P. (1990) Replacement systems and the axiomatization of situation theory. In: Cooper R., Mukai K., Perry J. (eds) Situation theory and its applications. CLSI Publications, Stanford, pp 3–33Google Scholar
  2. Bonnay, D., & Westerståhl, D. (2010). In M. Aloni, & K. Schulz (Eds.), Amsterdam Colloquium 2009, LNAI 6042 (pp. 193–202). Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  3. Dunn M., Belnap N. Jr. (1968) The substitution interpretation of the quantifiers. Noûs 4: 177–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. MacFarlane, J. (2009). Logical constants. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2009 ed.).Google Scholar
  5. Peters S., Westerståhl D. (2006) Quantifiers in language and logic. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  6. van Benthem J. (2003) Is there still logic in Bolzano’s key?. In: Morscher (Ed.) E. (eds) Bernard Bolzanos Leistungen in Logik, Mathematik und Physik Bd. 16. Academia Verlag, Sankt Augustin, pp 11–34Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Philosophy, Linguistics and Theory of ScienceUniversity of GothenburgGothenburgSweden

Personalised recommendations