The staccato roller coaster: a simple physical model of the staccato run
- First Online:
- 159 Downloads
I present a simple model of Grünbaum’s staccato run in classical mechanics, the staccato roller coaster. It consists of a bead sliding on a frictionless wire shaped like a roller coaster track with infinitely many hills of diminishing size, each of which is a one-dimensional variant of the so-called Norton dome. The staccato roller coaster proves beyond doubt the dynamical (and hence logical) possibility of supertasks in classical mechanics if the Norton dome is a proper system of classical mechanics with metaphysical import. If not, challenges raised against the metaphysical significance of the Norton dome are shown to be challenges against various arguments for the dynamical possibility of supertasks, and the staccato roller coaster clearly shows the importance of meeting these challenges. And the staccato roller coaster can provide, as well as interesting lessons, illuminating analyses of Burke’s (Mod Schoolman 78:1–8, 2000) attempt to refute the dynamical possibility of the staccato run and Pérez Laraudogoitia’s (Synthese 148:433–441, 2006) rebuttal of it.
KeywordsSupertask Staccato run Norton dome Infinity
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Black, M. (1950–1951). Achilles and the tortoise. Analysis 11, 91–101. Reprinted in Salmon (1970).Google Scholar
- Grünbaum A. (1967) Modern science and Zeno’s paradoxes. Wesleyan University Press, Middletown, CTGoogle Scholar
- Grünbaum, A. (1970). Modern science and Zeno’s paradoxes of motion. In W. Salmon (Ed.), Zeno’s paradoxes (pp. 200–250). Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
- Korolev, A. (2007b). The Norton-type Lipschitz-indeterministic systems and elastic phenomena: Indeterminism as an artefact of infinite idealizations. PSA 2008 Contributed Papers. http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/4314. Accessed 30 April 2011.
- Norton, J. (2003). Causation as folk science. Philosopher’ s Imprint 3. http://hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.3521354.0003.004. Accessed 30 April 2011.
- Salmon W. (1970) Zeno’s paradoxes. Bobbs-Merrill, Indianapolis, INGoogle Scholar
- Thomson, J. (1954). Tasks and super-tasks. Analysis 15, 1–13. Reprinted in Salmon (1970).Google Scholar