Reversing 30 years of discussion: why causal decision theorists should one-box
- First Online:
- Cite this article as:
- Spohn, W. Synthese (2012) 187: 95. doi:10.1007/s11229-011-0023-5
The paper will show how one may rationalize one-boxing in Newcomb’s problem and drinking the toxin in the Toxin puzzle within the confines of causal decision theory by ascending to so-called reflexive decision models which reflect how actions are caused by decision situations (beliefs, desires, and intentions) represented by ordinary unreflexive decision models.
KeywordsCausal decision theory Evidential decision theory Newcomb’s problem Toxin puzzle Reflexive decision theory
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.