This paper examines how coherence of the contents of evidence affects the transmission of probabilistic support from the evidence to the hypothesis. It is argued that coherence of the contents in the sense of the ratio of the positive intersection reduces the transmission of probabilistic support, though this negative impact of coherence may be offset by other aspects of the relations among the contents. It is argued further that there is no broader conception of coherence whose impact on the transmission of probabilistic support is never offset by other aspects of the relations among the contents. The paper also examines reasons for the contrary impression that coherence of the contents increases the transmission of probabilistic support, especially in the special case where the hypothesis to evaluate is the conjunction of the contents of evidence.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Akiba K. (2000) Shogenji’s probabilistic measure of coherence is incoherent. Analysis 60: 356–359
Bovens L., Hartmann S. (2003) Bayesian epistemology. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Bovens L., Hartmann S. (2005) Why there cannot be a single probabilistic measure of coherence. Erkenntnis 63: 361–374
Crupi V., Tentori K., Gonzalez M. (2007) On Bayesian measures of evidential support: Theoretical and empirical issues. Philosophy of Science 74: 229–252
Douven I., Meijs W. (2007) Measuring coherence. Synthese 156: 405–425
Fitelson B. (1999) The plurality of Bayesian measures of confirmation and the problem of measure sensitivity. Philosophy of Science 66: S362–S378
Fitelson B. (2003) A probabilistic theory of coherence. Analysis 63: 194–199
Huemer, M. (2006). Review of against coherence: Truth, probability, and justification by Erik Olsson. Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews.
McGrew T. (2003) Confirmation, heuristics, and explanatory reasoning. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 54: 553–567
Myrvold W. (1996) Bayesianism and diverse evidence: A reply to Andrew Wayne. Philosophy of Science 63: 661–665
Okasha S. (2004) Wright on the transmission of support: A Bayesian analysis. Analysis 64: 139–146
Olsson E. (2001) Why coherence is not truth conducive. Analysis 61: 236–241
Olsson E. (2002) What is the problem of coherence and truth?. Journal of Philosophy 94: 246–272
Olsson E. (2005) Against coherence: Truth, probability, and justification. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Schupbach J. (2008) On the alleged impossibility of Bayesian coherentism. Philosophical Studies 141: 323–331
Schupbach J. (2011) New hope for Shogenji’s coherence measure. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 62: 125–142
Shogenji T. (1999) Is coherence truth conducive?. Analysis 59: 338–345
Shogenji T. (2003) A condition for transitivity in probabilistic support. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 54: 613–616
Shogenji T. (2005) The role of coherence of evidence in non-dynamic model of coherence. Erkenntnis 63: 317–333
Shogenji T. (2006) Review of Bayesian epistemology by L. Bovens and S. Hartmann. Theoria 72: 166–171
Shogenji T. (2008) Review of against coherence: truth, probability, and justification by Erik Olsson. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 77: 292–296
White R. (2006) Problems for dogmatism. Philosophical Studies 131: 525–557
About this article
Cite this article
Shogenji, T. Coherence of the contents and the transmission of probabilistic support. Synthese 190, 2525–2545 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-011-0003-9
- Content of evidence
- Diversity of evidence
- Probabilistic support
- Impossibility result
- Ceteris paribus conditions
- Weak Bayesian coherentism