Advertisement

Synthese

, Volume 177, Issue 3, pp 471–492 | Cite as

Leading with ethics, aiming for policy: new opportunities for philosophy of science

  • Nancy TuanaEmail author
Article

Abstract

The goal of this paper is to articulate and advocate for an enhanced role for philosophers of science in the domain of science policy as well as within the science curriculum. I argue that philosophy of science as a field can learn from the successes as well as the mistakes of bioethics and begin to develop a new model that includes robust contributions to the science classroom, research collaborations with scientists, and a role for public philosophy through involvement in science policy development. Through an analysis of two case studies, I illustrate how philosophers of science can make effective and productive contributions to science education as well as to interdisciplinary scientific research, and argue for the essential role of philosophers of science in the realm of science policy.

Keywords

Science policy Research ethics Science education Climate change Bioethics 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adger W. N. (2004) The right to keep cold. Environment and Planning 36: 1711–1715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alcamo, J., Shaw, R., Hordijk, L. (eds) (1990) The RAINS model of acidification: Science and strategies in Europe. Kluwer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  3. Benatar S., Fleischer T. (2006) Bioethics with blinders. Hastings Center Report 36(6): 4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bernstein, L., Bosch, P., Canziani, O., Chen, Z., Christ, R., Davidson, O., et al. (Eds.). (2008). IPCC, 2007: Climate change 2007: Synthesis report. Contribution of working groups I, II and III to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Geneva, Switzerland: IPCC.Google Scholar
  5. Broecker W. S. (1991) The great ocean conveyor. Oceanography 4: 79–89Google Scholar
  6. Broome J. (1991) Weighing goods: Equality, uncertainty and time. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  7. Broome J. (1992) Counting the cost of global warming. White Horse Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  8. Broome J. (1999) Ethics out of economics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USACrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Broome J. (2004) Weighing lives. Oxford University Press, Oxford; New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Caney S. (2006) Global justice, rights, and climate change. Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 18(2): 255–278Google Scholar
  11. Cass D. (1965) Optimum growth in an aggregative model of capital accumulation. Review of Economic Studies 32(3): 233–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cranor C. F. (1993) Regulating toxic substances: A philosophy of science and the law. Oxford University Press, Oxford; New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Daniels N. (2006) Equity and population health: Toward a broader bioethics agenda. Hastings Center Report 36(4): 22–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ehrlich P.R. (2003) Bioethics: Are our priorities right?. Bioscience 53(12): 1207–1216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Farmer P. (2004) Pathologies of power: Health, human rights, and the new war on the poor. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  16. Farmer P., Campos N. G. (2004) Rethinking medical ethics: A view from below. Developing World Bioethics 4(1): 17–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fletcher J. C. (1995) Clinical bioethics at the NIH: History and a new vision. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 5(4): 355–364Google Scholar
  18. Fuller S. (1993) Philosophy of science and its discontents. Guilford Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Gardiner S. M. (2006) A perfect moral storm: Climate change, intergenerational ethics and the problem of moral corruption. Environmental Values 15(3): 397–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Goes, M., Keller, K., & Tuana, N. (forthcoming). The economics (or lack thereof) of aerosol geoengineering. Climatic Change.Google Scholar
  21. IPCC. (2007). Summary for policymakers. In: S. Solomon, D. Qin, M. Manning, Z. Chen, M. Marquis, K.B. Averyt, et al. (Eds.), Climate change 2007: The physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Knorr Cetina K. D. (1999) Epistemic cultures. How the sciences make knowledge. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  23. Koopmans T. C. (1965) On the concept of optimal economic growth. Academiae Scientiarum Scripta Varia 28(1): 225–300Google Scholar
  24. Leary N., Conde C., Kulkarni J., Nyong A., Pulhin J. (2008) Climate change and vulnerability. Earthscan Publications, London; Sterling, VAGoogle Scholar
  25. Louis M. E. S., Hess J. J. (2008) Climate change impacts on and implications for global health. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 35: 527–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lowey E.H., Springer Lowey R. (2005) Use and abuse of bioethics: Integrity and professional standing. Health Care Analysis 13(1): 73–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mastrandrea M. D., Schneider S. H. (2004) Probabilistic integrated assessment of “dangerous” climate change. Science 304(5670): 571–575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. McInerney D., Keller K. (2008) Economically optimal risk reduction strategies in the face of uncertain climate thresholds. Climatic Change 91(1–2): 29–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Meehl G. A. et al (2007) Global Climate Projections. In: Solomon S., Qin D., Manning M., Chen Z., Marquis M., Averyt K. B., Tignor M., Miller H. L. (eds) Climate change 2007: The physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USAGoogle Scholar
  30. Mervis J. (2001) NSF scores low on using own criteria. Science 291(5513): 2533–2535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mitcham C., Frodeman R. (2004) New directions in the philosophy of science: Toward a philosophy of science policy. Philosophy Today 48: 3–15Google Scholar
  32. National Science Foundation. (1997). GPRA Strategic Plan, FY 1997-FY 2003. http://www.nsf.gov/od/gpraplan/gpraplan.htm
  33. National Science Foundation. (2002). Important Notice No. 127, Implementation of new Grant Proposal Guide Requirements Related to the Broader Impacts Criterion.Google Scholar
  34. Nordhaus W. D. (1992) An optimal transition path for controlling greenhouse gases. Science 258(5086): 1315–1319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nordhaus W.D. (2007) A review of the stern review on the economics of climate change. Journal of Economic Literature 45(3): 686–702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Paavola J., Adger W. N. (2006) Fair adaptation to climate change. Ecological Economics 56(4): 594–609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Parks B., Roberts T. (2006) Globalization, vulnerability to climate change, and perceived injustice. Society and National Resources 19(4): 337–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ramsey F. (1928) A mathematical theory of saving. Economic Journal 38(152): 543–559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sachs W. (2006) Climate change and human rights; Interactions between global change and human health. Scripta Varia 106 Pontifical Academy of Sciences, Vatican CityGoogle Scholar
  40. Sagoff M. (2004) Price, principle, and the environment. Cambridge University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Schienke E.W., Tuana N., Brown D.A., Davis K.J., Keller K., Shortle J.S. et al (2009) The role of the NSF Broader Impacts Criterion in enhancing research ethics pedagogy. Social Epistemology 23(3–4): 317–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Schienke, E. W., Baum, S., Tuana, N., Davis, K. J., & Keller, K. (2010). Intrinsic ethics regarding integrated assessment models for climate management. Science and Engineering Ethics doi: 10.1007/s11948-010-9209-3.
  43. Schneider S. H. (2001) What is ‘dangerous’ climate change?. Nature 411: 17–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Schneider S. H., Semenov S., Patwardhan A., Burton I., Magadza C. H. D., Oppenheimer M. et al (2007) Assessing key vulnerabilities and the risk from climate change. In: Parry M. L., Canziani O. F., Palutikof J. P., Linden P. J. v. d., Hanson C. E. (eds) Climate change 2007: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 779–810Google Scholar
  45. Sen A. (2000) The discipline of cost-benefit analysis. Journal of Legal Studies 29(2): 931–952CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Shrader-Frechette K. S. (1993) Burying uncertainty: Risk and the case against geological disposal of nuclear waste. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  47. Shrader-Frechette K. S. (2007) Taking action, saving lives: Our duty to protect the environmental and public health. Oxford University Press, Oxford; New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Shue H. (2003) Climate. In: Jamison D. (eds) A companion to environmental philosophy. Wiley-Blackwell, New York, pp 449–459Google Scholar
  49. Solomon M. (2007) The social epistemology of NIH Consensus Conferences. In: Kincaid H., McKitrick J. (eds) Establishing medical reality: Methodological and metaphysical issues in philosophy of medicine. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp 167–177Google Scholar
  50. Stern N. (2007) The economics of climate change: The Stern review. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  51. Traweek S. (1988) Beamtimes and lifetimes: The world of high energy physicists. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  52. United Nations. (1992). United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, Article 2. FCCC/INFORMAL/84 GE.05-62220 (E) 200705.Google Scholar
  53. United States Congress. (2007). American Creating Opportunities to Meaningfully Promote Excellence in Technology, Education, and Science Act (America COMPETES Act).Google Scholar
  54. Urban N. M., Keller K. (2009) Complementary observational constraints on climate sensitivity. Geophysical Research Letters 36: L04708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Vanderheiden S. J. (2008) Atmospheric justice: A political theory of climate change. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  56. Weitzman M. L. (2007) A review of The Stern Review of the Economics of Climate Change. Journal of Economic Literature 43(3): 703–724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Weitzman M. L. (2009) On modeling and interpreting the economics of catastrophic climate change. Review of Economics and Statistics 91(1): 1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyPenn State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations