Synthese

, Volume 173, Issue 1, pp 1–8 | Cite as

Introduction to knowability and beyond

Article

References

  1. Beall Jc. (2000) Fitch’s proof, verificationism, and the knower paradox. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 78: 241–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beall Jc. (2009) Knowability and possible epistemic oddities. In: Salerno J. (eds) New essays on the knowability paradox. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  3. Bigelow J. (2005) Omnificence. Analysis 65: 187–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brogaard B., Salerno J. (2006) Knowability and a modal closure principle. American Philosophical Quarterly 43: 261–270Google Scholar
  5. Dummett M. (2009) Fitch’s paradox of knowability. In: Salerno J. (eds) New essays on the knowability paradox. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  6. Edgington D. (1985) The paradox of knowability. Mind 94: 557–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fitch, F. (1963). A logical analysis of some value concepts. The Journal of Symbolic Logic, 28, 135–142. (Reprinted in Salerno (Ed.), 2009.)Google Scholar
  8. Fox, J. Fitch–Humberstone arguments. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  9. Hart W. D. (1979) The epistemology of abstract objects: Access and inference II. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 53(Suppl.): 153–165Google Scholar
  10. Hart W. D., McGinn C. (1976) Knowledge and necessity. Journal of Philosophical Logic 5: 205–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Humerstone I. (1985) The formalities of collective omniscience. Philosophical Studies 48: 401–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Mackie J. (1980) Truth and knowability. Analysis 40: 90–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Priest G. (2009) Beyond the limits of knowledge. In: Salerno J. (eds) New essays on the knowability paradox. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  14. Rescher N. (2005) Epistemic logic. University of Pittsburgh Press, PittsburghGoogle Scholar
  15. Rosenkranz S. (2004) Fitch back in action again?. Analysis 64: 67–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Routley, R. (1981). Necessary limits of knowledge: Unknowable truths. In M. Edgar, N. Otto, & Z. Gerhard (Eds.), Essays in scientific philosophy. Dedicated to Paul Weingartner/Philosophie als Wissenschaft. Paul Weingartner gewidmet (pp. 93–115). Bad Reichenhall: Comes Verlag. (Reprinted, this volume.)Google Scholar
  17. Salerno, J. (eds) (2009) New essays on the knowability paradox. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  18. Tennant N. (1997) The taming of the true. Clarendon, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  19. Tennant N. (2001) Is every truth knowable? Reply to Williamson. Ratio 14: 263–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Williamson T. (2000a) Knowledge and its limits. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  21. Williamson T. (2000b) Tennant on knowable truth. Ratio 13: 99–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Williamson T. (2009) Tennant’s troubles. In: Salerno J. (eds) New essays on the knowability paradox. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophySaint Louis UniversitySaint LouisUSA
  2. 2.Australian National UniversityCanberraAustralia

Personalised recommendations