, 171:227 | Cite as

Logic of change, change of logic

  • Hans van Ditmarsch
  • Brian Hill
  • Ondrej Majer


  1. Alchourron C. E., Gärdenfors P., Makinson D. (1985) The logic of theory change: Partial meet contraction and revision functions. The Journal of Symbolic Logic 50: 510–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aumann R. J. (1976) Agreeing to disagree. The Annals of Statistics 4: 1236–1239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baltag, A., & Smets, S. (2006). Dynamic belief revision over multi-agent plausibility models. In Bonanno, G., van der Hoek, W., & Wooldridge, M. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th conference on logic and the foundations of game and decision theory (LOFT’06), pp. 11–24Google Scholar
  4. Bradley R. (2007) The kinematics of belief and desire. Synthese 56: 513–535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. de Finetti, B. (1937). La prévision: ses lois logiques, ses sources subjectives. Annales de l’Institut Henri PoincaréGoogle Scholar
  6. Debreu, G. (1959). Theory of value. An axiomatic analysis of economic equilibrium. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Gärdenfors P. (1988) Knowledge in flux: Modeling the dynamics of epistemic states. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  8. Grove A. (1988) Two modelings for theory change. Journal of Philosophical Logic 17: 157–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Grüne-Yanoff, T., & Hansson, S. O. (Eds). (2009). Preference change. Approaches from philosophy, economics and psychology, volume 42 of Theory and Decision Library A. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  10. Hansson S. O. (1999) A textbook of belief dynamics, theory change and database updating. Kluwer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  11. Hintikka J. (1962) Knowledge and belief: An introduction to the logic of the two notions. College Publications, London Nouvelle édition. 2005Google Scholar
  12. Jeffrey R.C. (1972) The logic of decision (2nd ed.). University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  13. Krantz, D. H., Luce, R. D., Suppes, P., & Tversky, A. (1971). Foundations of measurement (Vol. 1). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  14. Levi I. (1974) On indeterminate probabilities. Journal of Philosophy 71: 391–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Plaza J. (1989). Logics of public communications. In Proceedings of the 4th international symposium on methodologies for intelligent systems, pp. 201–216.Google Scholar
  16. Ramsey, F. P. (1931) Truth and probability. In The foundations of mathematics and other logical essays. Harcourt, Brace and Co., New York.Google Scholar
  17. Rott H. (1999) Coherence and conservatism in the dynamics of belief. Part I: Finding the right framework. Erkenntnis 50: 387–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Savage, L. J. (1954). The foundations of statistics (2nd ed.). New York: Dover. 1971.Google Scholar
  19. Segerberg K. (1998) Irrevocable belief revision in dynamic doxastic logic. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 39: 287–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Spohn, W. (1988). Ordinal conditional functions: A dynamic theory of epistemic states. In W. Harper & B. Skyrms (Eds.), Causation in decision, belief change, and statistics (2nd ed.). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  21. van Benthem J. (2007) Dynamic logic for belief revision. Journal of Applied Non-classical Logics 17: 129–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. van Ditmarsch, H. (2008) Comments on the logic of conditional doxastic actions. In K. Apt & R. van Rooij (Eds.), New perspectives on games and interaction, texts in logic and games (Vol. 4, pp. 33–44). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
  23. van Ditmarsch H. P. (2005). Prolegomena to dynamic logic of belief revision. Synthese 147: 229–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. von Neumann J., Morgenstern O. (1947) Theory of games and economic behavior (2nd ed.). Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hans van Ditmarsch
    • 1
    • 2
  • Brian Hill
    • 3
    • 4
  • Ondrej Majer
    • 5
  1. 1.Universidad de SevillaSevillaSpain
  2. 2.University of Otago, Computer ScienceDunedinNew Zealand
  3. 3.HEC ParisJouy-en-JosasFrance
  4. 4.IHPST (CNRS/Paris 1/ENS)ParisFrance
  5. 5.Institute of PhilosophyAcademy of Sciences of the Czech RepublicPrague 1Czech Republic

Personalised recommendations