Is structural underdetermination possible?
- 184 Downloads
Structural realism is sometimes said to undermine the theory underdetermination (TUD) argument against realism, since, in usual TUD scenarios, the supposed underdetermination concerns the object-like theoretical content but not the structural content. The paper explores the possibility of structural TUD by considering some special cases from modern physics, but also questions the validity of the TUD argument itself. The upshot is that cases of structural TUD cannot be excluded, but that TUD is perhaps not such a terribly serious anti-realistic argument.
KeywordsTheory underdetermination Structural realism Missing physics examples Mathematical overdetermination
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Glymour, C. (1977). Indistinguishable Space-Times and the Fundamental Group. In J. Earman, C. Glymour, & J. Stachel (Eds.), Foundations of space-time theories (Vol. 8), Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
- Ladyman, J., & Ross, D. (with D. Spurrett and J. Collier) (2007). Every thing must go: Metaphysics naturalised. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Lyre H. (2004a) Lokale Symmetrien und Wirklichkeit. Mentis, PaderbornGoogle Scholar
- Lyre, H. (2009). Structural realism and abductive-transcendental arguments. InM. Bitbol, P. Kerszberg, & J. Petitot, Constituting objectivity. Transcendental perspectives on modern physics. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
- Malament, D. (1977). Observationally indistinguishable space-times. In J. Earman, C. Glymour, & J. Stachel (Eds.), Foundations of space-time theories (Vol. 8), Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
- Quine W. V. (1990) Three indeterminacies. In: Barrett R. B., Gibson R. F. (eds) Perspectives on quine. Blackwell, Oxford, p.13Google Scholar
- Scheibe, E. (1994). On the mathematical overdetermination of physics. In E. Rudolph, I.-O. Stamatescu (Eds.), Philosophy, mathematics and modern physics (pp. 186–199). Berlin: Springer. (Reprinted from Between rationalism and empiricism: Selected papers in the philosophy of physics, No. VIII.38 by E. Scheibe, Ed., 2001, Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
- Shapiro S. (2000) Thinking about Mathematics. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar