Structural realism is sometimes said to undermine the theory underdetermination (TUD) argument against realism, since, in usual TUD scenarios, the supposed underdetermination concerns the object-like theoretical content but not the structural content. The paper explores the possibility of structural TUD by considering some special cases from modern physics, but also questions the validity of the TUD argument itself. The upshot is that cases of structural TUD cannot be excluded, but that TUD is perhaps not such a terribly serious anti-realistic argument.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Earman J. (1993) Underdetermination, realism, and reason. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 18: 19–38
Esfeld M. (2004) Quantum entanglement and a metaphysics of relations. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 35(4): 601–617
French S. (2006) Structure as a weapon of the realist. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 106: 167–185
Glymour, C. (1977). Indistinguishable Space-Times and the Fundamental Group. In J. Earman, C. Glymour, & J. Stachel (Eds.), Foundations of space-time theories (Vol. 8), Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Hayashi K., Shirafuji T. (1979) New general relativity. Physical Review D 19(12): 3524–3553
Hoefer C., Rosenberg A. (1994) Empirical equivalence, underdetermination, and systems of the world. Philosophy of Science 61: 592–607
Laudan L., Leplin J. (1991) Empirical equivalence and underdetermination. Journal of Philosophy 88: 449–472
Ladyman, J., & Ross, D. (with D. Spurrett and J. Collier) (2007). Every thing must go: Metaphysics naturalised. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lyre H., Eynck T. O. (2003) Curve it, gauge it, or leave it? underdetermination in gravitational theories. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 34(2): 277–303
Lyre H. (2004a) Lokale Symmetrien und Wirklichkeit. Mentis, Paderborn
Lyre H. (2004b) Holism and structuralism in U(1) gauge theory. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 35(4): 643–670
Lyre, H. (2009). Structural realism and abductive-transcendental arguments. InM. Bitbol, P. Kerszberg, & J. Petitot, Constituting objectivity. Transcendental perspectives on modern physics. Berlin: Springer.
Malament, D. (1977). Observationally indistinguishable space-times. In J. Earman, C. Glymour, & J. Stachel (Eds.), Foundations of space-time theories (Vol. 8), Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Nester J.M. (1988) Is there really a problem with the teleparallel theory?. Classical and Quantum Gravity 5: 1003–1010
Quine W. V. (1975) On empirically equivalent systems of the world. Erkenntnis 9: 313–328
Quine W. V. (1990) Three indeterminacies. In: Barrett R. B., Gibson R. F. (eds) Perspectives on quine. Blackwell, Oxford, p.13
Redhead M. (2002) The interpretation of gauge symmetry. In: Kuhlmann M., Lyre H., Wayne A. (eds) Ontological aspects of quantum field theory. World Scientific, Singapore, pp 281–301
Scheibe, E. (1994). On the mathematical overdetermination of physics. In E. Rudolph, I.-O. Stamatescu (Eds.), Philosophy, mathematics and modern physics (pp. 186–199). Berlin: Springer. (Reprinted from Between rationalism and empiricism: Selected papers in the philosophy of physics, No. VIII.38 by E. Scheibe, Ed., 2001, Berlin: Springer.
Shapiro S. (2000) Thinking about Mathematics. Oxford University Press, Oxford
van Fraassen B. C. (1980) The scientific image. Clarendon Press, Oxford, p. 46
About this article
Cite this article
Lyre, H. Is structural underdetermination possible?. Synthese 180, 235–247 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-009-9603-z
- Theory underdetermination
- Structural realism
- Missing physics examples
- Mathematical overdetermination