, Volume 181, Issue 1, pp 3–21 | Cite as

Reichenbach’s cubical universe and the problem of the external world

  • Elliott SoberEmail author


This paper is a sympathetic critique of the argument that Reichenbach develops in Chap. 2 of Experience and Prediction for the thesis that sense experience justifies belief in the existence of an external world. After discussing his attack on the positivist theory of meaning, I describe the probability ideas that Reichenbach presents. I argue that Reichenbach begins with an argument grounded in the Law of Likelihood but that he then endorses a different argument that involves prior probabilities. I try to show how this second step in Reichenbach’s approach can be strengthened by using ideas that have been developed recently for understanding causation in terms of the idea of intervention.


Common cause Correlation External world Likelihood Realism Reichenbach Solipsism 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Carnap R. (1953) Meaning and synonymy in natural languages. Philosophical Studies 6: 33–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Carnap, R. (1956). Empiricism, semantics, and ontology. In Meaning and necessity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  3. Edwards A. (1972) Likelihood. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  4. Fine, A. (1984). The natural ontological attitude. In J. Leplin (Ed.), Scientific realism (pp. 83–107). Berkeley: University of California Press. (Reprinted in The shaky game, pp. 112–135. Chicago: University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
  5. Glymour C. (1977) Reichenbach’s entanglements. Synthese 34: 219–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hacking I. (1965) The logic of statistical inference. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  7. Hacking I. (1985) Do we see through the microscope? In: Churchland P., Hooker C. (eds) Images of science: Essays on realism and empiricism. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  8. Hausman D. (1998) Causal asymmetries. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Howard-Snyder, D. (Ed.). (1996). The evidential argument from evil. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  10. McGurk H., McDonald J. (1976) Hearing lips and seeing voices. Nature 264: 746–748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Putnam H. (1975) Mind, language, and reality. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Reichenbach, H. (1925). Die Kausalstruktur der Welt und der Unterschied von Vergangenheit und Zukunft. In Sitzungsberichte der Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaft, November, pp. 133–175. (Translated as The causal structure of the world and the difference between past and future. In R. Cohen & M. Reichenbach (Eds.), Hans Reichenbach—Selected Writings, 1909–1953 (1978, pp. 81–119)). Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
  13. Reichenbach, H. (1935). The theory of probability—an inquiry into the logical and mathematical foundations of the calculus of probability, 2nd edn. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1948.Google Scholar
  14. Reichenbach, H. (1938). Experience and prediction—an analysis of the foundations and structure of knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Reissued 2006 by University of Notre Dame Press with an introduction by A. Richardson).Google Scholar
  15. Reichenbach H. (1956) The direction of time. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  16. Royall R. (1997) Statistical evidence—a likelihood paradigm. Chapman and Hall, Boca Raton, FLGoogle Scholar
  17. Salmon W. (1984) Scientific explanation and the causal structure of the world. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  18. Salmon W. (1999) Ornithology in a cubical world: Reichenbach on scientific realism. In: Greenberger D., Reiter W., Zeilinger A. (eds) Epistemological and experimental perspectives on quantum physics. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 303–315Google Scholar
  19. Skyrms B. (1984) Pragmatics and empiricism. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  20. Sober, E. (1988). The principle of the common cause. In J. Fetzer (Ed.) Probability and causation: Essays in honor of Wesley Salmon (pp. 211–228). Dordrecht: Reidel. (Reprinted in E. Sober, From a biological point of view. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994).Google Scholar
  21. Sober, E. (2000). Quine’s two dogmas. In Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Vol. 74, pp. 237–280.Google Scholar
  22. Sober E. (2001) Venetian sea levels, British bread prices, and the principle of the common cause. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 52: 1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sober E. (2007) Empiricism. In: Psillos S., Curd M. (eds) The Routledge companion to the philosophy of science. Routledge, London, pp 129–138Google Scholar
  24. Sober E. (2008) Evidence and evolution—the logic behind the science. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  25. Spirtes P., Glymour C., Scheines R. (2001) Causality, prediction, and search. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  26. Woodward J. (2003) Making things happen: A theory of causal explanation. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  27. Yule G. U. (1926) Why do we sometimes get nonsensical relations between time series? A study of sampling and the nature of time series. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 89: 1–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of Wisconsin-MadisonMadisonUSA

Personalised recommendations