Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

On Hans Reichenbach’s inductivism

  • 198 Accesses

  • 4 Citations


One of the first to criticize the verifiability theory of meaning embraced by logical empiricists, Reichenbach ties the significance of scientific statements to their predictive character, which offers the condition for their testability. While identifying prediction as the task of scientific knowledge, Reichenbach assigns induction a pivotal role, and regards the theory of knowledge as a theory of prediction based on induction. Reichenbach’s inductivism is grounded on the frequency notion of probability, of which he prompts a more flexible version than that of Richard von Mises. Unlike von Mises, Reichenbach attempts to account for single case probabilities, and entertains a restricted notion of randomness, more suitable for practical purposes. Moreover, Reichenbach developed a theory of induction, absent from von Mises’s perspective, and argued for the justification of induction. This article outlines the main traits of Reichenbach’s inductivism, with special reference to his book Experience and prediction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. Carnap, R. (1936–1937). Testability and meaning. Philosophy of Science, 3, 419–471; 4, 1–40.

  2. Carnap R. (1946) Remarks on induction and truth. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 6: 590–602

  3. Dawid P., Galavotti M. C. (2009) De Finetti’s subjectivism, objective probability, and the empirical validation of probability assessments. In: Galavotti M. C. (eds) Bruno de Finetti, radical probabilist. College Publications, London, pp 97–114

  4. Eberhardt, F., & Glymour, C. (in press). Hans Reichenbach’s probability logic. In D. Gabbay, S. Hartmann, & J. Woods (Eds.), Handbook of the history of logic X: Inductive logic. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

  5. Feigl, H. (1950). De principiis non disputandum ...? On the meaning and the limits of justification. In M. Black (Ed.), Philosophical analysis (pp. 119–56). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press (Reprinted in H. Feigl, Inquiries and provocations: selected writings 1929–1974, pp. 237–68, by R. S. Cohen, Ed., 1980, Dordrecht: Reidel).

  6. Galavotti M. C. (2001) Subjectivism, objectivism and objectivity in Bruno de Finetti’s Bayesianism. In: Corfield D., Williamson J. (eds) Foundations of Bayesianism. Kluwer, Dordrecht, Boston, London, pp 173–186

  7. Galavotti M. C. (2003) Kinds of probabilism. In: Parrini P., Salmon W. C., Salmon M. H. (eds) Logical empiricism. Historical and contemporary perspectives. University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, pp 281–303

  8. Galavotti M. C. (2005) Philosophical introduction to probability. CSLI, Stanford

  9. Hacking . (1968) One problem about induction. In: Lakatos I. (eds) The problem of inductive logic. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 44–59

  10. Reichenbach, H. (1933, 1949). Die logischen Grundlagen des Wahrscheinlichkeitsbegriffs, Erkenntnis, 3, 401–425. (English edition with modifications of The logical foundations of the concept of probability. In H. Feigl & W. Sellars (Eds.), 1949, Readings in philosophical analysis (pp. 305–323). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts).

  11. Reichenbach, H. (1933, 1978). Carnap’s logical structure of the world. Kantstudien, 38, 199–201 (Reprinted in English in Reichenbach 1978, Vol. I, pp. 405–408).

  12. Reichenbach H. (1935) Wahrscheinlichkeitslehre. Sijthoff, Leyden

  13. Reichenbach H. (1936) Logicist empiricism in Germany and the present state of its problems. Journal of Philosophy 6: 141–160

  14. Reichenbach, H. (1937). La philosophie scientifique: une esquisse de ses traits principaux. In Travaux du IX Congrès International de Philosophie (pp. 86–91). Paris: Hermann.

  15. Reichenbach H. (1938) Experience and prediction. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

  16. Reichenbach, H. (1949). The theory of probability. Berkeley-Los Angeles: University of California Press. (Second edition 1971. English translation of Reichenbach 1935 with modifications).

  17. Reichenbach H. (1951) The verifiability theory of meaning. Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 53: 46–60

  18. Reichenbach, H. (1978). Selected writings, 1909–1953. In M. Reichenbach & R. S. Cohen (Eds.), (Vols. I–II). Dordrecht, Boston: Reidel.

  19. Salmon W. C. (1953) The uniformity of nature. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 14: 39–48

  20. Salmon W. C. (1963) On vindicating induction. Philosophy of Science 30: 252–261

  21. Salmon W. C. (1979) The philosophy of Hans Reichenbach. In: Salmon W. C. (eds) Hans Reichenbach: Logical empiricist. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp 1–84

  22. Salmon W. C. (1991) Hans Reichenbach’s vindication of induction. Erkenntnis 35: 99–122

  23. Salmon W. C. (1994) Carnap, Hempel, and Reichenbach on scientific realism. In: Salmon W. C., Wolters G. (eds) Logic, language, and the structure of scientific theories. University of Pittsburgh Press and Konstanz: Universitätsverlag, Pittsburgh, pp 237–254

  24. Salmon W. C. (1998) Causality and explanation. Oxford University Press, Oxford

  25. Salmon W.C. et al (1999) Ornithology in a cubical world: Reichenbach on scientific realism. In: Greenberger D. (eds) Epistemological and experimental perspectives on quantum physics. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 303–315

  26. Schickore, J., Steinle, F. (eds) (2006) Revisiting discovery and justification. Dordrecht, Springer

  27. Van Fraassen B. (1882) Rational belief and the common cause principle. In: McLaughlin R. (eds) What? Where? When? Why? Reidel, Dordrecht, pp 193–210

  28. von Mises, R. (1939). Probability, statistics and truth. London, New York: Allen and Unwin (Reprinted New York: Dover, 1957. English revised edition of Wahrscheinlichkeit, Statistik und Wahrheit. Vienna: Springer, 1928).

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Maria Carla Galavotti.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Galavotti, M.C. On Hans Reichenbach’s inductivism. Synthese 181, 95–111 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-009-9589-6

Download citation


  • Probability
  • Induction
  • Epistemology