Synthese

, Volume 169, Issue 2, pp 351–369 | Cite as

Determining the environment: a modal logic for closed interaction

  • Jan Broersen
  • Rosja Mastop
  • John-Jules Meyer
  • Paolo Turrini
Article
  • 58 Downloads

Abstract

The aim of the work is to provide a language to reason about Closed Interactions, i.e. all those situations in which the outcomes of an interaction can be determined by the agents themselves and in which the environment cannot interfere with they are able to determine. We will see that two different interpretations can be given of this restriction, both stemming from Pauly Representation Theorem. We will identify such restrictions and axiomatize their logic. We will apply the formal tools to reason about games and their regulation.

Keywords

Cooperative Game Theory Logic Closed Interaction 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abdou, J., & Keiding, H. (1991). Effectivity functions in social choice. In Theory and decision library C (Vol. 8). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  2. Alur R., Henzinger T.A., Kupferman O. (2002) Alternating-time temporal logic. Journal of the ACM 49(5): 672–713CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blackburn, P., de Rijke, M., & Venema, Y. (2001). Modal logic. Cambridge Tracts in Theoretical Computer Science (Vol. 53). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Borgo, S. (2007). Coalitions in action logic. Proceedings of IJCAI 2007 (pp. 1822–1827). Hyderabad, India.Google Scholar
  5. Broersen, J., Meyer. J. J. Ch., Mastop, R., & Turrini P. (2008). A deontic logic for socially optimal norms. In Proceedings of ninth international workshop on deontic logic in computer science, Berlin: Spriger.Google Scholar
  6. Chellas B. (1980) Modal logic: An introduction. Cambridge University Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  7. Coleman, K. G. (2004). Computing and moral responsibility. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.Google Scholar
  8. Conte, R., & Paolucci, M. (2004) Responsibility for societies of agents. JASSS, http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/7/4/3.html.
  9. Grossi D., Royakkers L., Dignum F. (2007) Organizational structure and responsibility. Artificial Intelligence and Law 12(3): 223–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hansen, H. H. (2003). Monotonic modal logics. Master Thesis, Universiteit van Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  11. Hansen, H. H., & Pauly, M. (2002). Axiomatising nash-consistent coalition logic. In Proceedings of JELIA 2002, pp. 394–406.Google Scholar
  12. Harel D. (1984) Dynamic logic. In: Gabbay D., Guenther F. (eds) Handbook of philosophical logic volume II—extensions of classical logic. D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  13. Horty J. (2001) Deontic logic and agency. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Liu, F. (2008). Changing for the better: Preference dynamics and agent diversity. PhD Thesis, ILLC Dissertation Series.Google Scholar
  15. Osborne M., Rubinstein A. (1994) A course in game theory. The MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  16. Parikh, R. (1985). The logic of games and its applications. In Selected papers of the international conference on “foundations of computation theory” on Topics in the theory of computation (pp. 111–139). Sweden: Borgholm.Google Scholar
  17. Pauly, M. (2001). Logic for social software. PhD thesis, ILLC Dissertation Series.Google Scholar
  18. Pauly M, Parikh R. (2003) Game logic—an overview. Studia Logica 75(2): 165–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. van Ditmarsch, H., van der Hoek, W., & Kooi, B. (2007). Dynamic epistemic logic. In Synthese library (Vol. 337). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  20. von Wright G.H. (1972) The logic of preference reconsidered. Theory and Decision 3: 140–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. von Wright G.H. (1980) Freedom and determination. North Amsterdam, Holland Publishing CoGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jan Broersen
    • 1
  • Rosja Mastop
    • 1
  • John-Jules Meyer
    • 1
  • Paolo Turrini
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Information and Computing SciencesUniversiteit UtrechtUtrechtThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations